Can a Sony shooter ever go fully Pro? |
Page <1 456 |
| Author | ||
marlon127
Senior Member
Joined: 26 April 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 2201 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 July 2010 at 02:39 |
|
I rented a D3s recently and to be perfectly honest I was disappointed in the ISO performance I didn't find it to be as advanced as what I saw in reviews. I was really impressed with the jpg performance and metering. |
||
|
Commercial & Advertising
http://www.marlonrichardson.net Weddings & Events http://www.marlonrichardson.com |
||
![]() |
||
| Sponsored Links | ||
![]() |
||
Davey
Senior Member
Joined: 14 July 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 628 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 July 2010 at 02:54 |
|
|
Exactly. It's not about ego, it's about learning how to work with LIGHT.
In my opinion, the worst thing anyone can say to a photographer after you take a photo is, "what camera did you shoot that with?" Cameras don't take photos. PHOTOGRAPHERS take photos. And again, I can't emphasize this enough: lighting is far more important than any camera you will ever use. Light is the photographer's paintbrush. Learn how to use it and you can't go wrong. INVEST IN GOOD LIGHTS.
|
||
![]() |
||
wprowland
Groupie
Joined: 01 September 2009 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 68 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 July 2010 at 22:03 |
|
|
Marlon--you have some extremely nice work on your site.
Disappointed in the d3s? Really? Granted, the only reason I'd get the d3s is if I had a need for video. The d700 is basically a d3 minus a few features (but equivalent in iso performance)--I wince when I have to break out iso 2000 or greater with the a850....but not the d700. |
||
![]() |
||
WestCoast
Senior Member
Joined: 24 July 2009 Country: Canada Status: Offline Posts: 535 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 July 2010 at 23:40 |
|
I knew a guy that tried, but he got arrested and no one’s heard from him since. A reliable Internet source told me that a lot of Pros that use Sony, paint Nikon on the front of the camera, just to get past security.
|
||
|
Alpha 700 - D300 + Glass
|
||
![]() |
||
Davey
Senior Member
Joined: 14 July 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 628 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 03:56 |
|
|
I'm sorry, but that doesn't sound the slightest bit believable to me.
From my own experience, security doesn't care WHAT you shoot with -- THEY CARE ABOUT CREDENTIALS.
I've shot dozens of concerts/festivals including bands like Radiohead, Coldplay, Jay-Z, Yeah Yeah Yeahs, Sonic Youth, The Gossip, The Raveonettes, Vampire Weekend, Fleet Foxes, Kings Of Leon, etc., both on stage and in the pit, and not once has security ever looked at the make of my cameras. The only people who notice cameras brands are other photographers.
|
||
![]() |
||
WestCoast
Senior Member
Joined: 24 July 2009 Country: Canada Status: Offline Posts: 535 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 04:24 |
|
Oh OK, how about my wife left me because I swapped my Adidas for Nike?. |
||
|
Alpha 700 - D300 + Glass
|
||
![]() |
||
marlon127
Senior Member
Joined: 26 April 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 2201 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 05:17 |
|
I shoot at ISO 3200 - 6400 routinely with my A900. It's really not an issue with NR software. I find that I need to clean up noise any camera I use at 3200 or higher. I would rather have better IQ and larger image from 100-1600 then loose a bit of that punch for shots I need to shoot higher than 3200 ISO. Super ISO comparisons are like comparing who's worst shot is worst instead of who's best shot is best. |
||
|
Commercial & Advertising
http://www.marlonrichardson.net Weddings & Events http://www.marlonrichardson.com |
||
![]() |
||
800si
Senior Member
Joined: 04 September 2005 Location: Canada Status: Offline Posts: 862 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 05:25 |
|
|
A bit off topic, but who has processed A900/850 RAW files in Lightroom3? I find that does a much, much better with noise than LR2. My 7D RAW files processed in LR3 look cleaner than my 5DmkII files processed in LR2.
|
||
|
KM7D, Sony A700, 5DmkII, 1DmkIV, 7D, Leica M6 Ti. KM17-35, Sony 16-80, KM24-105, Beercan, Tamron 70-210 f2.8, Leica 35 f1.4, 17mm f4L TS-E, 24mm f1.4L, 24-70L, 70-200 f2.8L IS, 85mm f1.2, 500mm f4L IS
|
||
![]() |
||
WestCoast
Senior Member
Joined: 24 July 2009 Country: Canada Status: Offline Posts: 535 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 05:37 |
|
|
Nice stuff marlon127, I do professional architectural photography for a national leasing company.
Not as intriguing as your work. |
||
|
Alpha 700 - D300 + Glass
|
||
![]() |
||
PHCorrigan
Senior Member
Joined: 18 March 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 238 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 06:00 |
|
It does a great job on my high-ISO a100 photos. |
||
|
Patrick
A100 (2), So50_1.4, M50_1.7,Sig50_2.8, So18-70, So18-200, M35-105, M100_2.8, Beercan, Big Beercan, M75-300 new, 3600HS-D, 5600HS-D, HVL-F42AM, Sekonic L-358 |
||
![]() |
||
K.C.
Groupie
Joined: 29 September 2009 Status: Offline Posts: 63 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 July 2010 at 09:14 |
|
That's because the jokes on you for taking him seriously. Now his wife leaving him because his Nikes needed a bit of air, that I can buy.
|
||
![]() |
||
odl
Groupie
Joined: 18 March 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Posts: 44 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 August 2010 at 06:30 |
|
|
I think taking for granted the FF support and continued lens releases you will find more and more Sony professionals out there.
It must be next to impossible to convince Nikon or Canon users to sell up and buy Sony, but future photographers will make choices based on other perameters. The a850 is a very comfortable camera to use, with great image quality, as is the a900... both for an astonishing price. Give it time, focus on your work, eventually the camera you use wont matter. Ab |
||
|
a850, 100mm f2.8 sony, 50mm f1.4 sony, 50mm f2.8
sony, 12-24 sigma, 35mm f2, 135mm f2.8 |
||
![]() |
||
> Forum Home > Equipment forums > Other Photographic Equipment
|
Page <1 456 |
|
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.250 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the Minolta / Alpha-mount dSLR photographer.
Feel free to contact us if needed. You can support future development by making a donation.

Dyxum website
Filter posts

Topic Options
Post Options


wprowland wrote:

