Comparison: Sigma 24-70 hsm/Sony 24-70 zeiss |
Page 12> |
| Author | ||
captb
Senior Member
Joined: 24 April 2011 Country: United States Location: Hawaii Status: Offline Posts: 247 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Comparison: Sigma 24-70 hsm/Sony 24-70 zeissPosted: 23 February 2012 at 09:51 |
|
|
After some support from my fellow dyxumers. here is a quick comparison between the sigma 24-70mm HSM and the sony 24-70mm zeiss. Dont scroll down right away, try to guess which was taken with which camera. results are at the bottom. all pictures were untouched other than WB in lightroom. all were taken with an a900, fine jpeg, awb, exposure +0.7, aperture priority.
Wide angle IQ Test Picture#1 ![]() DSC02011 by captb, on Flickr 1:1 view ![]() 1cropped by captb, on Flickr Picture #2 ![]() DSC02013 by captb, on Flickr 1:1 view ![]() 2cropped by captb, on Flickr Zoom IQ Test Picture#1 ![]() DSC02014 by captb, on Flickr Picture #2 ![]() DSC02012 by captb, on Flickr Bokeh/wide open test Picture set #1 f/2.8 ![]() DSC02021 by captb, on Flickr f/3.2 ![]() DSC02022 by captb, on Flickr f/3.5 ![]() DSC02023 by captb, on Flickr f/4 ![]() DSC02024 by captb, on Flickr f/4.5 ![]() DSC02025 by captb, on Flickr Picture set #2 f/2.8 ![]() DSC02026 by captb, on Flickr f/3.2 ![]() DSC02027 by captb, on Flickr f/3.5 ![]() DSC02028 by captb, on Flickr f/4 ![]() DSC02029 by captb, on Flickr f/4.5 ![]() DSC02030 by captb, on Flickr Color Test Picture #1 ![]() DSC02031 by captb, on Flickr Picture #2 ![]() DSC02032 by captb, on Flickr |
||
|
a900+vg/a700/a65/a300/24-70 cz/Sigma 70-200 hsm/Minolta 28mm 2.8/Minolta 50mm 1.7/HVL-f42am/Minolta 5400hs/Metz 58 af-2
|
||
![]() |
||
| Sponsored Links | ||
![]() |
||
captb
Senior Member
Joined: 24 April 2011 Country: United States Location: Hawaii Status: Offline Posts: 247 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 February 2012 at 09:51 |
|
|
Results:
Wide angle IQ Test: Picture #1 - Zeiss Picture #2 - Sigma Zoom IQ Test: Picture #1 - Sigma Picture #2 - Zeiss Bokeh/wide open test: Picture Set #1 - Sigma Picture Set #2 - Zeiss Color Test: Picture #1 - Zeiss Picture #2 - Sigma |
||
|
a900+vg/a700/a65/a300/24-70 cz/Sigma 70-200 hsm/Minolta 28mm 2.8/Minolta 50mm 1.7/HVL-f42am/Minolta 5400hs/Metz 58 af-2
|
||
![]() |
||
captb
Senior Member
Joined: 24 April 2011 Country: United States Location: Hawaii Status: Offline Posts: 247 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 February 2012 at 09:58 |
|
|
I have to say, you can see a bit more detail in the zeiss but not much. also, the metering with the sigma was consistently overexposed but of course you can lower that by lowering the exposure one stop. colorwise, i was surprised that the sigma seemed to be closer to reality. but that may just be how i white balanced. im particularly looking at the orange in the box. also, my monitor isnt calibrated so that may be a factor as well.
I know this test wasnt very detailed but I hope the side by side comparison can help some people decide if they want to upgrade. |
||
|
a900+vg/a700/a65/a300/24-70 cz/Sigma 70-200 hsm/Minolta 28mm 2.8/Minolta 50mm 1.7/HVL-f42am/Minolta 5400hs/Metz 58 af-2
|
||
![]() |
||
Mariani
Senior Member
Joined: 28 June 2011 Country: United States Location: Seattle, WA Status: Offline Posts: 212 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 February 2012 at 17:20 |
|
|
thank you for the test. it does appear that the Sigma seems overexposed compared to the Zeiss in the first few comparison. If they were exposed properly, the difference would be hard to tell.
as for the bokeh tests, i can't tell a difference at all. thank you again. |
||
|
Sony DSLR-A850 Sigma 12-24 / Zeiss 24-70 / Minolta 50 f1.4 / Sigma 70-200 HSM II / Sony 70-300 G A77 & A700 / 16-80 / Sigma 8-16mm / Sigma 50-150mm 2.8 |
||
![]() |
||
spada
Senior Member
Joined: 25 November 2008 Country: United States Location: Michigan Status: Offline Posts: 1263 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 February 2012 at 21:10 |
|
|
Although the differences are subtle, i was able to correctly guess each set. In the wide and zoom tests, I could tell from the better contrast and sharpness in the cheeks of the toy, and the bokeh test, I could tell the Zeiss was smoother (less outlined bokeh highlights) and in the color test, the yellow gives the Sigma away every time.
|
||
|
Ben Spada
A700|Σ18-50HSM|T28-75|35/1.8|T70-200|R85/1.4|50/2.8|Beercan| |
||
![]() |
||
captb
Senior Member
Joined: 24 April 2011 Country: United States Location: Hawaii Status: Offline Posts: 247 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 February 2012 at 21:33 |
|
np. i was surprised how similar they came out as well. |
||
|
a900+vg/a700/a65/a300/24-70 cz/Sigma 70-200 hsm/Minolta 28mm 2.8/Minolta 50mm 1.7/HVL-f42am/Minolta 5400hs/Metz 58 af-2
|
||
![]() |
||
captb
Senior Member
Joined: 24 April 2011 Country: United States Location: Hawaii Status: Offline Posts: 247 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 February 2012 at 21:42 |
|
Although IQ of both were similar it is still clear that the zeiss is the superior lens. also, I very much prefer the color of the zeiss to the sigma. if i hadnt already bought the zeiss i think i could justify keeping the sigma. Edited by captb - 23 February 2012 at 22:01 |
||
|
a900+vg/a700/a65/a300/24-70 cz/Sigma 70-200 hsm/Minolta 28mm 2.8/Minolta 50mm 1.7/HVL-f42am/Minolta 5400hs/Metz 58 af-2
|
||
![]() |
||
hylo66
Senior Member
Joined: 22 February 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 181 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 February 2012 at 08:28 |
|
Thank you for the test The results look very similar but like mentioned above, the Zeiss is a superior lens. No worries, I'm sure you will enjoy the Zeiss a lot.
|
||
![]() |
||
gqc
Newbie
Joined: 24 October 2011 Country: United States Location: Florida Status: Offline Posts: 11 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 February 2012 at 14:16 |
|
|
Thanks for the test.
|
||
|
A580,M(white)80-200mm f2.8 GHS,M RS 28-105mm f3.5-4.5,M macro 100mm f2.8,M 70-210mm f3.5-4.5,M 35-105mm f3.5-4.5(white),T 35-105mm f2.8,MAXXUM 7,SAL35F18,SAL50F18
|
||
![]() |
||
jdkeck
Senior Member
Joined: 27 June 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 904 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 February 2012 at 15:06 |
|
|
i can say that i am glad i have the cz and although the difference is slight, it is there. thanks for the comparison, i have always wondered how they compared.
|
||
|
a850,cz24-70, sony 50 f1.4, sony 30f2.8, sony 70-300g, minolta 28-135,
|
||
![]() |
||
tomiZG
Senior Member
Joined: 12 August 2008 Country: Croatia Location: Zagreb Status: Offline Posts: 918 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 February 2012 at 16:33 |
|
|
Thanks for the test indeed.
Now, does anyone have a clue how the Sigma 24-70 hsm compares to the slightly older (recently discontinued) Sigma 24-70 Macro (2.8 aswell)? I purchased the latter (original local Sigma shop/importer), as it was delivered by mistake, but I also paid only half the price than for the hsm version. |
||
|
a900+VG, a700, a230 | Dynax500 | portfolio
|
||
![]() |
||
Jeroon
Senior Member
Joined: 17 October 2011 Country: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 910 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 February 2012 at 17:49 |
|
|
@Captb: In your Color Test, picture #1 (Zeiss), I see a blue line above the Sony box. In picture 2 (Sigma) the blue is barely visible. Is it chroma, colour fringing or something else?
|
||
|
For sale on Dyxum
|
||
![]() |
||
Steve-S
Senior Member
Joined: 20 July 2006 Country: United Kingdom Location: Sonoma Co. CA Status: Offline Posts: 2095 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 February 2012 at 18:01 |
|
|
||
|
Alpha: a350+5D+7000; SAL1870, MinO50/1.7, MinO75-300, Tam90/2.8, Smyg85/1.4, others.
SR(MC/MD): XD-11, XK+AEhead Min50/1.7&1.4, Tam70-150/3.5, Viv35/2.8, Viv2xTC |
||
![]() |
||
captb
Senior Member
Joined: 24 April 2011 Country: United States Location: Hawaii Status: Offline Posts: 247 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 February 2012 at 18:51 |
|
That's correct. The Tv was on while I was taking pictures. Sorry for the confusion. |
||
|
a900+vg/a700/a65/a300/24-70 cz/Sigma 70-200 hsm/Minolta 28mm 2.8/Minolta 50mm 1.7/HVL-f42am/Minolta 5400hs/Metz 58 af-2
|
||
![]() |
||
> Forum Home > Equipment forums > Lens Talk
|
Page 12> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.219 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the Minolta / Alpha-mount dSLR photographer.
Feel free to contact us if needed. You can support future development by making a donation.

Dyxum website
Filter posts

Topic Options
Post Options





















Mariani wrote:
The results look very similar but like mentioned above, the Zeiss is a superior lens. No worries, I'm sure you will enjoy the Zeiss a lot.

