|
Page <12345 34> |
| Author | ||||
Rex
Groupie
Joined: 06 September 2008 Country: Cyprus Location: Nicosia Status: Offline Posts: 89 |
Posted: 16 September 2011 at 16:56 |
|||
|
I voted yes a very nice combo a900+a77
. The a77 will be manly for sports & action
|
||||
![]() |
||||
| Sponsored Links | ||||
![]() |
||||
T.A.
Groupie
Joined: 28 July 2005 Country: Malaysia Status: Offline Posts: 76 |
Posted: 16 September 2011 at 17:13 |
|||
|
Getting an A77 to replace my KM 5D (severe black frame issue), A100 would be my backup.
Weird thing is, I'm not as excited upgrading as I would be if moving from film/digital 5 to 7. Sony seem to dislike external controls and that's part of what I'd look for when upgrading. What I like tho, is that the 2 things I'd hoped for (2 stops ISO and focus speed improvement) the A77 should have no problem with it. Took a long while to decide on a final setup (body/lens combo). - Decided against a FF setup due to costs & weight. - When the time is up for my A100, I might just do with 1 body. - Choice of lenses would be just 1. Sony 16-50 f2.8 SSM (To replace Sigma 10-20, KM28-75) 2. 70-200 f2.8 SSM (Sadly the range is not ideal on an APSC for me) 3. When budget permits, I might get the STF. (Wanted this for too long but it's a "luxury lens" and had to be prioritised last) Could have chosen A65 (size/weight) if it came with the kit lens as a combo. |
||||
![]() |
||||
Steve-S
Senior Member
Joined: 20 July 2006 Country: United Kingdom Location: Sonoma Co. CA Status: Offline Posts: 1863 |
Posted: 16 September 2011 at 17:14 |
|||
|
Considering it; but I still recall my dismay upon handling the a700 -- my fingers kept landing the wrong places and hitting controls I didn't mean to, when I was just trying to hold the camera for framing/shooting. I decided the a700 wasn't for me.The a77 will need to have clean "holding" areas for my hands/fingers, where I don't have to worry about changing controls accidentally. - Steve S. |
||||
|
alpha: a350, 5D, 7000;
SAL1870, MinO50/1.7, MinO75-300m Tam90/2.8, Samyang85/1.4, others unused. MC/MD: XD-11, XK+AEhead Min50/1.7, Min50/1.4, Tam70-150/3.5, Viv35/2.8, Viv2xTC |
||||
![]() |
||||
sybersitizen
Senior Member
Joined: 04 August 2006 Country: United States Location: California Status: Online Posts: 5674 |
Posted: 16 September 2011 at 17:24 |
|||
|
What happened to "Maybe, undecided until it's actually available"?
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Bahudda
Senior Member
Joined: 17 November 2009 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 518 |
Posted: 16 September 2011 at 17:35 |
|||
|
What happened to: "Just adding to current gear?"
|
||||
![]() |
||||
trainerKEN
Senior Member
Joined: 16 May 2009 Country: Canada Location: Vancouver/SoCal Status: Offline Posts: 1170 |
Posted: 16 September 2011 at 17:41 |
|||
+1 |
||||
|
a900/a77/CZ135/CZ1635/Σ85mm f1.4/Σ50mm f1.4/Σ70-200mm/Σ24-70mm f2.8/Σ10-20mm/Rokinon 24mm f1.4/F58am/F42AM
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Steve-S
Senior Member
Joined: 20 July 2006 Country: United Kingdom Location: Sonoma Co. CA Status: Offline Posts: 1863 |
Posted: 16 September 2011 at 17:53 |
|||
Consider the Sigma 50-150/2.8; it's intentionally an aps-c version of the classic 70-200. Here is a recent Dyxum thread from someone who considered, asked round, bought, then discussed. Dyxum is a GOOD place to look for this kind of info! Kudos to ilseholland and others who contributed to that thread. If the constant 2.8 isn't critical, the new Sony 55-200 is widely reviewed as having stellar optics; "far better than any lens this price has any right to be" is the way one reviewer expressed it. - Steve S. p.s. -- Here'd be a killer lightweight 2.8 set for the a77/a65: Tokina 11-16/2.8 Sony 16-50/2.8 Sigma 50-150/2.8 And if you need to go REALLY long (but "really long" + "2.8" means we have abandoned that whole "lightweight" bit...): Sigma 120-300/2.8 ... if they every actually bring it to Alphamount, as they have said they would... :( |
||||
|
alpha: a350, 5D, 7000;
SAL1870, MinO50/1.7, MinO75-300m Tam90/2.8, Samyang85/1.4, others unused. MC/MD: XD-11, XK+AEhead Min50/1.7, Min50/1.4, Tam70-150/3.5, Viv35/2.8, Viv2xTC |
||||
![]() |
||||
bobby335i
Senior Member
Joined: 22 August 2011 Status: Offline Posts: 158 |
Posted: 16 September 2011 at 18:09 |
|||
|
im upgrading from my trusty 7D
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Serdar A
Moderator Group
Joined: 29 January 2009 Country: United States Location: Gainesville, FL Status: Online Posts: 4836 |
Posted: 16 September 2011 at 18:17 |
|||
This poll will be around when the camera is released. |
||||
![]() |
||||
brian33
Alpha Eyes group
Joined: 21 October 2008 Location: France Status: Offline Posts: 3624 |
Posted: 16 September 2011 at 18:57 |
|||
We're a very decisive group here, take a stand!
In this case I would check the "yes" next to the camera you consider to be your main camera, then in your post discuss how you intend to use the a77 (alongside what camera, for what reasons, etc.)
Again, my suggestion is to choose that yes, downgrading from a900 then explain in the post your reasons for choosing, which may not be a downgrade for you. |
||||
![]() |
||||
DavidB
Senior Member
Joined: 26 March 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Posts: 2378 |
Posted: 16 September 2011 at 19:17 |
|||
Manly, yes, but women can use it too! Haven't decided yet whether to back up my a900 with the a77 or wait for the a99. Will try it out to see if I might like "less than full frame" for longer lenses again. |
||||
|
http://www.pbase.com/davidbannister
a900, a77, 7D, 9, 9xi, 9000, 16-50 2.8 SSM, 20 2.8, 24 2.8, 28-135, 50 1.7, 100 2.8M, 200 2.8G, 1.4 & 2x TC APO. |
||||
![]() |
||||
realgeek
Groupie
Joined: 04 January 2010 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 104 |
Posted: 16 September 2011 at 19:23 |
|||
|
I have pre-ordered an a77 to replace my a550.
|
||||
|
A77 & A850; Sigma 12-24, Sony 16-50, Sony 28-75, Tamron 70-200, Sony 70-300G, Tamron 200-500, Sony 50mm 1.4, Sigma 85mm 1.4, Sony 100mm macro, Tamron 180mm macro
|
||||
![]() |
||||
N. Lönngrén
Groupie
Joined: 30 September 2009 Country: Finland Location: Finland Status: Offline Posts: 85 |
Posted: 16 September 2011 at 19:29 |
|||
|
I won't buy it, I think. I'll probably wait for the next FF-bodies because I like my a850 so much.
|
||||
|
α850, α33
8FE - 28/1,8 - 50/1,4 - 85/1,4 - 90/2,8M - 135/1,8 - 500/8 Some zooms and flashes www.nestography.blogspot.com |
||||
![]() |
||||
trainerKEN
Senior Member
Joined: 16 May 2009 Country: Canada Location: Vancouver/SoCal Status: Offline Posts: 1170 |
Posted: 16 September 2011 at 19:48 |
|||
the thing is, I currently use both my a900 and a550... there are some advantages to having both FF and APS-C bodies. So, if there was a way to have multiple votes, I look at it as an UPGRADE from the a550. . |
||||
|
a900/a77/CZ135/CZ1635/Σ85mm f1.4/Σ50mm f1.4/Σ70-200mm/Σ24-70mm f2.8/Σ10-20mm/Rokinon 24mm f1.4/F58am/F42AM
|
||||
![]() |
||||
> Forum Home > Equipment forums > Camera Talk
|
Page <12345 34> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.220 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the Minolta / Alpha-mount dSLR photographer.
Feel free to contact us if needed. You can support future development by making a donation.

Dyxum website
Filter posts

Considering Purchase of the alpha77?
Topic Options

. The a77 will be manly for sports & action

I decided the a700 wasn't for me.
Peekayoh wrote:

