difficult choice: keep my sony/minolta collection? |
Page 123> |
| Author | |
peetjeg
Newbie
Joined: 18 April 2011 Location: NL Status: Offline Posts: 9 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: difficult choice: keep my sony/minolta collection?Posted: 18 January 2012 at 17:36 |
|
I have been collecting many sony/minolta equipment over the past 5 years.
Cameras: minolta 7d, sony A100, Sony A580 and Sony A850. Sold my Sony A700 about 8 months ago. Lenses (apart from minor quality lenses and many M42 lenses: Sony 70-200G, Sony 70-400G, Tamron 28-75, 2.8, Sony macro 100mm 2.8 D version, Sigma 18-250 hsm os, minolta 17-32 2.8-4.0, minolta 35-105 beercan, minolta 50mm 1.4, minolta 50 1.7, etc. Flashlights: minolta 36, sony 42 and sony 58. Since 1 month I have been using the Sony hyperzoom HX100V, which is, in my honest opinion an excellent performer and very convenient to carry around. Great Zoom (27-810mm optical, digital zoom is also very acceptable), wonderful daylight photos (carl zeiss lens T-coating) and various gimmicks like a wonderful hd video performance, 3D photos, etc. Now, I really doubt of selling all my DSLR equipment and go through photo-taking life with just my Sony HX100V. Of course I am well aware of compact's shortcomings and limitations. For example; no 2.8 covering all reach, no flashshoe (although the Sony hx100v has a very good flash reach), inferior bokeh, etc. etc. But, on the other hand, the sony hx100v is easy to carry (no weight problem), makes good photos, and has many great features. My question is: does my doubt sound familiar? Has anyone ever considered the same question, and more important, what was your decision? I should add that I am also not happy with all the (quite expensive) new Sony-DSLRs and those still to come. I read many different reactions and reviews on the A77 and A65. Probably, the new fullframe sony cameras will follow the same new slt line. This may have its advantages but also its limitations. And prices will certainly be quite stiff. Thanks for your reactions. |
|
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
Bjorn
Newbie
Joined: 26 May 2009 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Posts: 5 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2012 at 17:47 |
|
It's up to what you want from your hobby. I have gone the other way. Photo was my hobby 30 yrs ago, spent lots of time in darkrooms. When digital came I went compact and it took my some years to realize that I missed the bokeh, I missed the sharpness, the detailes. I never got pictures that "popped". Now I have some nice primes and a A350 and a A77 and now and then a picture popps. A77 is just great.
|
|
![]() |
|
BertH
Senior Member
Joined: 03 October 2009 Country: Netherlands Location: -2.9m NAP Status: Offline Posts: 749 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2012 at 18:11 |
|
I did the same as Bjorn, from analog SLR to digital compact and the next step was DSLR. Sometimes I hate carrying all that equipment around and in such moments I will have my compact in my pocket.
Any decision you take is good, it is your hobby and you, and only you, can decide which way to go. btw, if you decide to let go some of your camera's and lenses, give me a ring.....
|
|
|
Pentax K-5
|
|
![]() |
|
Dunadan
Senior Member
Joined: 09 November 2006 Country: Poland Location: Poland Status: Offline Posts: 1301 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2012 at 18:15 |
|
How can you compare image from compact camera and A850 and lets say... 50/1.7?...
but I understand the carrying problem - in fact I have the same problem when hiking in mountains.I think the best thing for you is to sell the compact and some body and buying NEX 5n or 7 ;) you can combine both - being compact, ligtwieght and image quality. And you can still use any of the Minolta/Sony lenses with LAEA2 |
|
|
Jakub
|
|
![]() |
|
bartman
Senior Member
Joined: 10 August 2010 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 371 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2012 at 18:16 |
+1 Ask yourself the question why you had all those lenses and cameras (must have cost you a little) and what has changed. |
|
![]() |
|
Sigurd
Senior Member
Joined: 12 January 2011 Status: Offline Posts: 404 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2012 at 18:21 |
|
Its a stupidly expensive hobby.
The perks are that you like to do it and you value the pictures you create highly (or somebody does). If either is not true you have to wonder if its worth it. Of course its much cheaper after you buy your kit but I don't believe any of it is an investment. If your priority changes you're better to get out and put the money into something that grows or spend it elsewhere. |
|
![]() |
|
romke
Senior Member
Joined: 03 September 2009 Country: Netherlands Location: Putte Status: Offline Posts: 2001 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2012 at 20:02 |
|
i would say investigate all the lenses you have and see what you did use the past year and how frequently. then sell all you have not used that often or not at all.
if you have the a850, all the other bodies you have will be inferior, thus sell those as well. keep the 50/100/70-200/28-75 if you want to continue using a dslr if not, sell all and shoot a while with the HX100V - and if you are not happy with the IQ or the possibilities, sell it as well and buy a NEX 5N or something similar. remember, there have been masters of photography that got away with a simple Leica and a 35 or 50 mm lens. a smaller number of lenses may limit you somewhat in what you can do, but at the same time forces you to exploit the possibilities just one lens can give you - which is usually quite a bit more then you did up till now.... |
|
![]() |
|
Rusty
Senior Member
Joined: 18 September 2008 Country: Canada Location: Ottawa Status: Offline Posts: 2250 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2012 at 20:13 |
Totally agree. If I was in your place, I would sell everything but the a850 and a few lenses. Out of your lineup, I would keep the 50/1.7, 28-75 and one of the tele zooms (probably the 70-200, since you already have the reach with the HX100). Maybe keep one flash, it comes in handy once in a while. my .02 |
|
|
stuff for sale: Maxxum 5, x-700, 17-50/2.8, 100-200/4.5, Jupiter 21M, many Helios 44-2, and more. PM me
|
|
![]() |
|
gsaronni
Senior Member
Joined: 02 October 2005 Country: Spain Location: Spain Status: Offline Posts: 1584 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2012 at 20:45 |
|
I would keep A850, 28-75 f2.8, 70-200 and a 50mm prime. More then enough for everyday use. A flash like the F42 good be a nice addition. Maybe you can trade the 50/1.4 for a 24/2.8 a nice and small prime
I have an excellent compact like the LX5 and I must say sometimes I think it is the only camera I need, see the kind of photos I use to take, this was taken with the G9 from my wife: ![]() You never can carry a DSLR, zoom and flash, but a compact is something you carry everywhere |
|
|
SAM 35/1.8 | SAL 50/1.4 | 100/2 | CZ 16-80 | 28-75 | Tamron 70-200 f2.8
LX5 | A700 | A580 http://www.flickr.com/photos/gsaronni/ |
|
![]() |
|
dumbasadoorknob
Senior Member
Joined: 24 August 2010 Country: United Kingdom Location: California Status: Offline Posts: 257 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2012 at 21:10 |
|
Do you find the HX100V is slow to start and to take pictures?
|
|
|
David
More lenses than brain cells |
|
![]() |
|
markce
Senior Member
Joined: 27 May 2007 Country: Netherlands Location: N.Br. Status: Offline Posts: 233 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2012 at 21:39 |
|
Just trying to help:
First question is if you just want snap-short or real pictures. Second, have you tried to take the A850 out with just a 50mm lens or just one zoom. You could also go the NEX route, and still use old lenses when you need to. |
|
![]() |
|
Tricky01
Senior Member
Joined: 08 September 2010 Country: United Kingdom Location: London Status: Offline Posts: 1112 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 January 2012 at 21:39 |
Perhaps I'm becoming a photography snob, but while it's a great shot to look back on for you and your family, I really want the subjects isolated from the background with a nice wide aperture. I know you can add it in photoshop and other apps but nothing beats hitting it first time. To the OP; as others have said, if you're happy with the performance then great. Personally I just picked up a canon G10 compact purely for using underwater (got the underwater housing and the camera has lots of manual features like aperture and shutter speed control) and having had a play with it on land it could never replace my DSLR. |
|
|
simontregidgo.com
A900s+VG, 16 fisheye, 16-35CZ, Min35f1.4, 85CZ, CZ135f1.8, Sony70-200G, Sony500f8, Min300f2.8HS, Min 1.4xII, Min 2xI |
|
![]() |
|
Cognated
Newbie
Joined: 05 October 2011 Country: United States Location: CA Status: Offline Posts: 8 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 January 2012 at 17:27 |
|
Go for it. I started with a megazoom before buying a DSLR. Granted it's not quite a compact, but it is much more portable and less of a hassle. I was able to get picture that made me quite happy.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() If you can do the same with your camera than go for it. You won't have all the nice features of a DSLR, but for walking around on a nice day that typically doesn't matter. |
|
![]() |
|
jenik.nk
Senior Member
Joined: 20 February 2010 Country: Czech Republic Status: Offline Posts: 587 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 January 2012 at 17:49 |
|
It seems to me that the fact that you are considering selling says something about your needs.
For me it's very strange that you can feel that one camera solution can satisfy you after using the fantastic set-up you still own (if only I could have a third or quarter of it!). But if you think so, it could really be ok for you and you could possibly sell it. Myself I couldn't do it, superzoom would fail in low light. But it seems you can. I also think you could be less radical. Maybe you should consider keeping the top of your DSLR gear - the A850 + 70-200 + 28-75 + some prime or wide angle + one flash + maybe some lens that is not so much worth selling. That could be your "professional" tool. And you can sell the rest, it is nearer your superzoom (A580, A100, superzoom lens... and other stuff). Edit: wish you the best to make the right choice! |
|
|
α200 - Tamron 17-50 - Minolta 28-105, 35-105 (O), 35-70/4, Beercan, 135/2.8; Sony 18-70, 50/1.4 - Σ EF-500 DG SUPER
|
|
![]() |
|
> Forum Home > Equipment forums > Camera Talk
|
Page 123> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the Minolta / Alpha-mount dSLR photographer.
Feel free to contact us if needed. You can support future development by making a donation.

Dyxum website
Filter posts

Topic Options
Post Options



btw, if you decide to let go some of your camera's and lenses, give me a ring.....
but I understand the carrying problem - in fact I have the same problem when hiking in mountains.
BertH wrote:





