FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Minolta colours?

Page  123 4>
Author
mikey2000 View Drop Down
Alpha Eyes group
Alpha Eyes group
OoU co÷rdinator

Joined: 10 January 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Posts: 9819
Post Options Post Options   Quote mikey2000 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Minolta colours?
    Posted: 19 August 2009 at 22:05
I've read lots of posts referring to the legendary "Minolta Colours" but I'm never exactly clear about what this precisely means.

Do the lenses add a subtle colour cast by virtue of the particular glass chemistry or lens coatings?
Do Sony lenses have a similar coating or glass? (Does my Sony 50/1.4 qualify as having Minolta colours?)
Is the great colour matched with compromises such as increased CA or something?
Are the effects dramatic or would a few kelvins on the whitebalance overpower the lens contribution?

I would be quite interested to see two shots taken with equivalent lenses, one Minolta and one Brand X, taken in identical light, manual WB etc so I can see for myself and finally understand.

Cheers,
Looking forward to hearing more about this....
Want to know more about Gert van den Bosch? Just click!
 



Back to Top
natamambo View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 06 September 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Posts: 1463
Post Options Post Options   Quote natamambo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 August 2009 at 02:39
It's all about richness and vibrancy. Very hard to explain unless you manage to get an identical shot with and without a Minolta lens. The "minolta colours" are warmer and deeper somehow, without being forced, false or over cooked.

Even within Minolta lenses some exhibit "it" better than others, the 24-105 is a little colder than the 28-135 for example but still richer than the Canon 24-105 IMO.

Some say it's at the cost of sharpness, but I don't know the slight softness is that evident until you get really large prints (or pixel peep).

Edited by natamambo - 20 August 2009 at 02:39
A900; A700;17-35;28-70G;28-135;70-200GSSM;70-300GSSM;2XAPO(D)TC;85 1.4G;100 macro;5600HS(D)
Back to Top
ricardovaste View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 08 August 2007
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Shropshire
Status: Offline
Posts: 9932
Post Options Post Options   Quote ricardovaste Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 August 2009 at 09:15
Does everyone actually love the 'Minolta colours'? I know I don't. A lot of the time with landscapes and especially portraits I have to desaturate because they're just too rich for my taste a lot of the time. But I'd prefer it that way - easier to remove a bit of colour than add some. When you get the right subject with the right balance of colours, it works well, but I don't find that happens frequently for me.
WEDDINGS: Richard Harris Photography | PERSONAL WORK: ourfragments.com
Back to Top
polyglot View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 25 June 2007
Country: Australia
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Posts: 3622
Post Options Post Options   Quote polyglot Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 August 2009 at 09:25
The Minolta AF lenses (at least the original series, probably most of the RS ones too but I don't know) had coatings adjusted for identical colour transmission through the whole lens range, so if you wanted to have matching prints/slides on the same film using multiple lenses, you didn't need to measure each lens and add correcting filter packs to them. This means that in some cases, the anti-reflective coatings are not as effective as they might have otherwise been, so there can be a slight loss of contrast.

Beyond that, the Minolta and (to a perhaps lesser extent) Sony DSLRs tend to have pretty strong Bayer masks, which means they are good at separating similar hues and will score well on a colour-accuracy test. The drawback is poorer sensitivity compared to both Canon and Nikon that use weaker Bayer filters - they get less noise at high ISO, we get better colour accuracy at low ISO.
C&C always welcome
ex-Pic-A-Day
on flickr
Back to Top
wetapunga View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 02 September 2007
Country: New Zealand
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Posts: 4915
Post Options Post Options   Quote wetapunga Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 August 2009 at 09:27
Go the low ISO shots
Back to Top
Minoltista View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 18 August 2008
Country: Italy
Status: Offline
Posts: 1695
Post Options Post Options   Quote Minoltista Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 August 2009 at 09:29
I definitely love the faboulus 'Minolta colours'.
And the Zeiss 24-70 F2.8 I have doesn't reproduce the colours like the minolta lens I have.

Minolta still misses to me.

Ciao,
MP
I was, I'm, I'll be Minolta user!
------------------------------
Zenfolio Photos
 



Back to Top
Remko View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 25 June 2006
Country: Netherlands
Location: ZH
Status: Offline
Posts: 797
Post Options Post Options   Quote Remko Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 August 2009 at 20:11
I also love the Minolta colours, not just from the AF-system, but from the Rokkor-systems as well.
Just beautifull!!!
Minolta / Dynax / Sony Alpha / NEX
A creative mind.
Back to Top
aarif View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 21 September 2005
Country: United Arab Emirates
Location: Dubai
Status: Offline
Posts: 5272
Post Options Post Options   Quote aarif Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 August 2009 at 20:40
yes Minolta colors so pleasing
Back to Top
algernon View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 05 July 2008
Country: Romania
Location: Bucharest
Status: Offline
Posts: 438
Post Options Post Options   Quote algernon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 August 2009 at 21:05
Yes, +1 to what polyglot said and this is an important thing: color matching across a lens range. I'm always very pleased when I switch from the 35-70/4 to the beercan and cannot see any color shift in my pictures
I wonder if someone still does color matching nowadays...

Regards,
Adrian


Edited by algernon - 20 August 2009 at 21:06

"You are what you is" - I.R. Baboon
Flickr page
Back to Top
alpha_in_exile View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 26 September 2007
Country: United States
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Posts: 2492
Post Options Post Options   Quote alpha_in_exile Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 August 2009 at 21:44
I've been tempted to a side-by-side with my KM 18-70 kit lens and my Min(O) 24/2.8. The colors probably aren't all that different with the 18-70 (given the heritage), but I think I've seen some difference. The 24/2.8 seems to match the beercan better than the kit lens, anyway. A better comparison would be a Sigma lens, or better still a CZ.
-- Matt
A900, Min 24/2.8, Min 50/1.4, Tam 90/2.8 Macro, Tam 70-200/2.8 | Nex5N & some MF lenses
my web gallery
Back to Top
Heyckendorff View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 30 June 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Posts: 387
Post Options Post Options   Quote Heyckendorff Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 August 2009 at 22:09
I have never compared Minolta lens photographs to e.g Canon or Nikon so I would┤nt be able to tell if there┤s a difference.
But I┤ve heard about those legendary Minolta colours as well. What I wonder is, if it┤s generally acknowledged, also by e.g. Canon and Nikon users, that Minolta lenses has those legendary colours?
Back to Top
Remko View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 25 June 2006
Country: Netherlands
Location: ZH
Status: Offline
Posts: 797
Post Options Post Options   Quote Remko Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 August 2009 at 22:43
Nikon/Canon users go for absolute sharpness...

I don't mind less sharpness, if I get those brilliant colors instead!
One can see already the difference while comparing to most Sigma lenses, of which the colors are flat. I have seen only a few Sigma lenses that can match a bit with the Minolta colours

18-70 kitlens performs a bit less than legendary, but still much better than sigma.

By the way, Minolta has never been acknowledged by canon/nikon users, so why generally? Minolta has always been first with most inventions which we nowadays call common. Just a bit of a weird dwarf...
Minolta / Dynax / Sony Alpha / NEX
A creative mind.
Back to Top
6tyNine View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 04 April 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Posts: 1572
Post Options Post Options   Quote 6tyNine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 August 2009 at 23:02
in terms of the colour matching theory, can anyone say for certain that canon, nikon, sigma or tamron lenses produce different colours within the same brand?


I think Minolta colours are best displayed with the G lenses. My 35G, 85G and 200G all have consistent muted contrast and saturation and warm, rich & vivid colour, smooth tones and creamy bokeh. They're a step above my 20/2.8, 24/2.8, 28/2.0 which are all pretty consistent among themselves and my 50/2.8 which has pretty cold colour and harsh contrast all in itself.

the differences don't always show up though.
Sony α100, Sony 18-70mm f/3.5-5.6, Sony 75-300mm f/4.5-5.6
Back to Top
Morten View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie

Joined: 30 August 2008
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Posts: 21
Post Options Post Options   Quote Morten Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 August 2009 at 23:09
odd - I thought it was the camera that produce the colours (and Sony seem to be quite boosted in other electronic products such as televisions and professional video cameras). A minor difference in the glass would imo be lost in a "vivid" image. I think I would go for sharpness and add colour if needed. And I don't understand how the same F on canikon and minolta can produce less or more iso-noise?
Back to Top
Dyxum main page >  Forum Home > Equipment forums > Lens Talk > A-mount lenses Page  123 4>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.079 seconds.

Monitor calibration strip

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer

In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania

Find us on Google+

Feel free to contact us if needed.