NEW Advanced Assignment # 2: Macro without Macro |
Page 123 11> |
| Author | |
pegelli
Admin Group
Dyxum Administrator Joined: 02 June 2007 Country: Belgium Location: Schilde Status: Offline Posts: 13119 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: NEW Advanced Assignment # 2: Macro without MacroPosted: 13 February 2010 at 21:53 |
|
This is the NEW Advanced Assignment #2:
The topic is Macro Without Macro and the idea is to enter the wonderful world of macro shots ... without a macro lens. Strictly speaking - direct use of any 1:1 or 1:2 macro lenses is not the intention of this assignment and therefore not allowed. I suggest using one of your "non-macro" lenses and employ one of the techniques listed below. Also realize macro is really 1:1 and higher, and 1:2 is really more "close focus" than macro, so for this assignment we're really looking 1:1 and higher magnifications. There is quite a number of them to choose from: * close-up lenses, * macro rings (aka extension tubes), * macro bellows, * reversing mount (i.e. one lens mounted on the body in reversed position), * reversing ring (i.e. reversed lens mounted on the other lens). While I realise that there are some members that do not have necessary equipment, I think that it is not very budget-stressing to get a reversed ring, or reversed mount, or a set of some close-up lenses and start "macro adventure" without spending too much. (besides, macro lenses are not real macro - what is 1:1 if you can get e.g. 4:1?)
Remember, this is an advanced assignment so we're expecting technically and compositionally good photographs and the AE's, mods and admins will put the bar pretty high for a pass. Any flaw will let you go back and try again. Last request: pls. describe the set-up you used (camera, lens(es), rings, tripod + assembly, etc. etc.) so we can all see and learn from the endless possibilities that exist in this field.
Edited by pegelli - 15 February 2010 at 07:33 |
|
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
alphatini
Senior Member
Joined: 10 November 2009 Country: Canada Location: Québec Status: Offline Posts: 584 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 February 2010 at 06:27 |
|
Ok, i'll go
no insects as it's winter here, i took a few shoots of a 25 ? moose. Simple setup : Reversed minolta 28mm f2.8, paper-clip for the aperture ring. 1. Resize only
2. 100% crop
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
pegelli
Admin Group
Dyxum Administrator Joined: 02 June 2007 Country: Belgium Location: Schilde Status: Offline Posts: 13119 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 February 2010 at 12:38 |
|
Good example, great sharpness on the eye. I assume the limited dof and the coin not exactly parallel to the sensor was specifically chosen to do that. I think it worked well. Maybe I would have only blurred the sharp "N" at the left in PP which is now mildly distracting, but won't hold that against a pass. Good luck with the next one.
|
|
![]() |
|
alphatini
Senior Member
Joined: 10 November 2009 Country: Canada Location: Québec Status: Offline Posts: 584 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 February 2010 at 16:21 |
|
Thanks Pieter. For the "N" i knew it was distracting i thought cropping was not allowed.
As for to clone it or PP it, not yet!!! it's only been a week since i've installed GIMP... :-) My APS-C sensor is 23.6 mm width and the coin's surface on the uncropped photo is +/- 11mm. Macro ratio was around 2.1:1 ; if i'm right in my maths .... Regards, and up to my next assigment |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Berean
Senior Member
Joined: 16 January 2010 Country: United Kingdom Location: Devon Status: Offline Posts: 155 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 February 2010 at 20:33 |
|
Okay, my submission using a close up filter. No cropping, but marginally desaturated, and hue changed slightly (? +5) to strengthen the image. Some small scratches cloned out. Resized in PS to 800. CD with water drops added for interest: Can you see my hand?
![]() Edited by Berean - 14 February 2010 at 20:34 |
|
|
Can't you see? It all makes perfect sense, expressed in dollars and cents, pounds, shillings and pence: Roger Waters.
A700, Sig 10-20, 17-70, 70-200, Min 24-85, 28, 50, Vivitar 100 macro, HVFL 42AM |
|
![]() |
|
bms44974
Moderator Group
Assignments Deputy Joined: 18 October 2008 Country: United States Location: Cary, NC Status: Offline Posts: 2935 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 February 2010 at 20:42 |
|
@Berean: Ian, Can you provide a bit more information about the lens and diopter rating for the closeup filter? Thanks... Brian
|
|
|
A700; A350 ; A100; SAL1870; SAL75300; SAL70300G; SAL50M28; CZ1680
|
|
![]() |
|
Berean
Senior Member
Joined: 16 January 2010 Country: United Kingdom Location: Devon Status: Offline Posts: 155 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 February 2010 at 20:58 |
Sorry, Brian: I wasn't thinking. Sigma 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DL lens (about 12 years old) from my Minolta days, that came with a free Sigma close up filter (72mm diameter) but no other information available. Allowed me to focus closer to the water droplets, from approximately 1 metre to roughly 30cm. |
|
|
Can't you see? It all makes perfect sense, expressed in dollars and cents, pounds, shillings and pence: Roger Waters.
A700, Sig 10-20, 17-70, 70-200, Min 24-85, 28, 50, Vivitar 100 macro, HVFL 42AM |
|
![]() |
|
pegelli
Admin Group
Dyxum Administrator Joined: 02 June 2007 Country: Belgium Location: Schilde Status: Offline Posts: 13119 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 February 2010 at 07:08 |
|
Berean, looking at the picture it seems about 1:2 (on the sensor, which is what counts) so it's more close focus then real macro, which theoretically only starts at 1:1. Eyeballing it looks you have a length of 4 to 5 cm on the CD. If my calculation is off let me know, but otherwise pls. try again with something with a higher magnification.
Nice shot btw, I like the reflections and the very warm toning. |
|
![]() |
|
Caddis
Groupie
Joined: 30 November 2009 Location: Norway Status: Offline Posts: 53 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 February 2010 at 07:25 |
|
KM 7D with Sony G 70-300mm and Raynox DCR-150 at 100mm. F19.
T
|
|
![]() |
|
brettania
Admin Group
Dyxum Administrator Joined: 17 July 2005 Country: New Zealand Location: Auckland Status: Offline Posts: 15824 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 February 2010 at 07:49 |
|
@ Caddis -- How does the shot compare with life-size?
|
|
![]() |
|
Caddis
Groupie
Joined: 30 November 2009 Location: Norway Status: Offline Posts: 53 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 February 2010 at 08:07 |
|
@ brettania -- The hook is about 11mm long
|
|
![]() |
|
pegelli
Admin Group
Dyxum Administrator Joined: 02 June 2007 Country: Belgium Location: Schilde Status: Offline Posts: 13119 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 February 2010 at 19:54 |
|
OK then it's still bigger than 1:1 (on the sensor of 24 mm this scene is abt 33 mm wide), so pls. try again and try to aim for something bigger than live size.
Btw, not a bad shot and the colour contrast between yellow hook and blue background give it a nice "kick". |
|
![]() |
|
ChrBra
Senior Member
Joined: 04 December 2008 Country: Sweden Location: Stockholm/Solna Status: Offline Posts: 847 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 February 2010 at 23:34 |
|
Ok! here´s my first try at an advanced assignment, it may not be enough but if it´s one thing, it´s beyond 1:1.
Here´s a detail shot of my Thors Hammer. a700 reversed Konica Hexagon AR 28 mm f 3,5 handheld 1/60 sec with Sigma 530 flash bounced in roof
and 1:1 with Sony 30 mm 2,8 for comparsion.
Regards Christer Edited by ChrBra - 15 February 2010 at 23:36 |
|
|
My Gear a700, Sony 16-105, 30 2,8 Min 200 f2,8 135 f2,8 70-210 f4 Sigma EX 50 1,4 EX 10-20 Kenko TC x1,5My Pics
|
|
![]() |
|
alphatini
Senior Member
Joined: 10 November 2009 Country: Canada Location: Québec Status: Offline Posts: 584 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 February 2010 at 06:21 |
|
nice
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
> Forum Home > Dyxum Photographs > Photographic Assignments
|
Page 123 11> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.266 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the Minolta / Alpha-mount dSLR photographer.
Feel free to contact us if needed. You can support future development by making a donation.

Dyxum website
Filter posts

Topic Options
Post Options


- what is 1:1 if you can get e.g. 4:1?)
)


bms44974 wrote:
