Test driving the Vivitar 7mm Fisheye |
Page 123> |
| Author | |
BobSo
Senior Member
Joined: 09 February 2006 Country: United States Location: Boston, MA Status: Offline Posts: 864 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Test driving the Vivitar 7mm FisheyePosted: 14 July 2009 at 23:50 |
|
Just received this lens from B and H today (and a curse on the person who started a thread about this lens a few days ago and brought it to my attention. I didn't need to spend any more money on lenses this year.) Took a few images and so far, so good. It's manual focus, of course, but that's not a problem. In fact, a lens like this could easily be fix focused. I forgot to focus a few times but could hardly tell in the final image. The instructions say to set the mode dial on Manual and also set manual focus on the front dial, but it seems to work just as well in Program mode and autofocus. It has an aperture ring, just like the old days, and this can be used to tweak the exposure. Here's a sample image. As I said, just a brief trial run but I think it's a keeper.
As promised, more photos. Took it out for further testing today. Since I bought this lens, we've had nothing but harsh, hard sunlight (not complaining though; it was a long time coming) and I'm anxious to see how it does in overcast conditions. So far, I'm happy with the lens.
![]() Edited by BobSo - 15 July 2009 at 22:14 |
|
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
drumsavant
Senior Member
Joined: 04 April 2008 Country: United Kingdom Location: Canada Status: Offline Posts: 249 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 July 2009 at 03:31 |
|
Thanks for posting, im interested in this lens as well. Does it appear to be the full 180 rectangular image? Some say its only about 150??
Can you post a few more pics and a link to there FULL resolution origin? That would be great if you could do that... Thanks Mike |
|
|
α700 ~ TAM17-50/2.8 ~ TAM70-200/2.8 ~ TAM90/2.8 ~ MIN50/1.7 ~ SIG10-20 ~ HVL-F58AM & F36AM ~ My Flickr
|
|
![]() |
|
soulfly
Senior Member
Joined: 19 December 2007 Location: Malaysia Status: Offline Posts: 223 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 July 2009 at 05:01 |
|
no vignetting?
|
|
|
Sony A700 w/VG-C70AM
Sony 18-70mm F3.5-5.6 Minolta AF 70-210mm F4 Sony HVL-F58AM Vivitar 285HV |
|
![]() |
|
polyglot
Senior Member
Joined: 25 June 2007 Location: Australia Status: Offline Posts: 3505 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 July 2009 at 05:14 |
|
I too want to know if it vignettes and what the sharpness is like at 100% compared to the Peleng. I'd sell my Zenitar off to fund one of these.
|
|
![]() |
|
BobSo
Senior Member
Joined: 09 February 2006 Country: United States Location: Boston, MA Status: Offline Posts: 864 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 July 2009 at 05:16 |
|
Haven't noticed any vignetting yet, but I've only taken a few shots. I don't know how the sharpness compares to the Peleng, since this is the only fisheye I have. Will shoot more tomorrow.
|
|
![]() |
|
Swiftyspix
Senior Member
Joined: 05 June 2007 Country: United States Location: East TN Status: Offline Posts: 829 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 July 2009 at 05:31 |
|
Bob, Did you take that with an A900? Looks to be a lens with allot of potential.
|
|
|
α700/VG, Maxxum 7, SE8000i kit BBC BC 28-70G 35-70/4 11-18 85/1.4 MC58/1.2 50/3.5 Macro 50/2.8 50/1.4 35/2 35/1.4 28/2 24/2.8 F58AM 5600HSD Civilizations die by suicide not by murder. A. J. Toynbee
|
|
![]() |
|
sybersitizen
Senior Member
Joined: 04 August 2006 Country: United States Location: California Status: Offline Posts: 5690 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 July 2009 at 06:16 |
It's not a full frame lens - it's specifically designed for correct coverage on APS-C. |
|
![]() |
|
BobSo
Senior Member
Joined: 09 February 2006 Country: United States Location: Boston, MA Status: Offline Posts: 864 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 July 2009 at 06:53 |
|
I wish I had an A900. It was with the A700. As for the field of view, Vivitar claims it's 180 in their packaging and literature and as far as I know, it is.
|
|
![]() |
|
polyglot
Senior Member
Joined: 25 June 2007 Location: Australia Status: Offline Posts: 3505 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 July 2009 at 07:05 |
|
Is it an A-mount lens with automatic aperture, or is it stop-down metering like you do with M42?
|
|
![]() |
|
Bob J
Admin Group
Dyxum Administrator Joined: 23 December 2005 Country: United Kingdom Location: London Status: Offline Posts: 15487 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 July 2009 at 07:39 |
|
One way of confirming is to put the camera facing up with the self-timer on and see how near to the horizon it gets on all sides - when we tried a similar experiment with the Zenitar on the a900 and film 7, it was a bit short of 180 on full-frame.
|
|
|
RBJ ~ Moderation on Dyxum
|
|
![]() |
|
sybersitizen
Senior Member
Joined: 04 August 2006 Country: United States Location: California Status: Offline Posts: 5690 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 July 2009 at 08:01 |
Bob, I pointed out your error in the original thread you're referring to. The 180 degree coverage is from corner to corner - not from side to side. |
|
![]() |
|
BobSo
Senior Member
Joined: 09 February 2006 Country: United States Location: Boston, MA Status: Offline Posts: 864 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 July 2009 at 15:38 |
|
Polyglot: It as an A mount lens, no adapter needed. The manual suggests stop down metering using the camera's shutter speed and the aperture ring on the lens, but like I said, it's pretty close to perfect every time in Program mode, with just minor tweaking needed. The manual also suggests a setting of EV +1 for correct brightness. I'm still playing with it and should have a better handle on things later. One thing I have noticed is a small loss of contrast but this is easily corrected.
|
|
![]() |
|
albnok
Senior Member
Joined: 01 October 2007 Location: Malaysia Status: Offline Posts: 993 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 July 2009 at 16:51 |
|
I don't get how this can be diagonally 180 degrees - the Sigma 10mm / Nikkor 10.5mm DX diagonal fisheye is supposed to give that.
7mm would be wider than the Peleng 8mm, which is a circular fisheye on full-frame. Is Vivitar mis-stating the focal length, or is the fisheye's curvature different from existing fisheyes? |
|
![]() |
|
sybersitizen
Senior Member
Joined: 04 August 2006 Country: United States Location: California Status: Offline Posts: 5690 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 July 2009 at 22:29 |
|
I at first assumed the same thing regarding focal length and angle of view; but this lens apparently breaks the rule. You have to read about the projection method, which is described in this review. And yes, Vivitar is very likely also misstating the true focal length, which they have done frequently.
|
|
![]() |
|
> Forum Home > Equipment forums > Lens Talk
|
Page 123> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the Minolta / Alpha-mount dSLR photographer.
Feel free to contact us if needed. You can support future development by making a donation.

Dyxum website
Filter posts

Topic Options
Post Options




Swiftyspix wrote:

