Dyxum website
|
Tokina for Sony soon? |
| Page 123 6> |
| Author | ||
ricardovaste
Senior Member
Joined: 08 August 2007 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6471 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Tokina for Sony soon?Posted: 28 May 2009 at 13:25 |
|
|
This won't interest many of you who aren't interested in these silly little sensors
, but i know a lot of you are fairly dedicated to APS-C for a few years yet (like myself). I got an email from Tokina (Japan) today:
So expect an announcement autumn-ish time I guess. Incase anyone had forgot, they quite a few nice wide options: Tokina lenses. Edited by ricardovaste - 28 May 2009 at 13:25 |
||
|
FS: Manual Focus 300/4.5 & 28/3.5 PC
Kind regards, Richard ------------------------- Wedding & Fine Art Photographer, Shropshire - rharris-images.com |
||
| Sponsored Links | ||
ponisch
Senior Member
Joined: 10 December 2008 Location: Sweden Online Status: Offline Posts: 818 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 13:35 |
|
|
Thanks, you made me believe again
I´ve been waiting for something like this to happend, since I´ve tried their 16-50/2.8 and 50-135 and WOW, they rule! Seriously! |
||
|
A700 | Tamron 90/2.8 | Min 35-70/4 | Soon Sigma 50/1.4
|
||
anderslynge
Senior Member
Joined: 31 October 2005 Location: Denmark Online Status: Offline Posts: 454 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 14:06 |
|
|
that would be great - their 10 - 17 wideangle / fisheye zoom is intriguing and really one of a kind as far as I know.
|
||
Winwalloe
Senior Member
Joined: 17 September 2007 Location: France Online Status: Offline Posts: 1472 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 14:14 |
|
|
Tokina doesnt make good FF lenses?
|
||
|
a900, 35/2, 50/1.7, 70-210/4, 200/2.8, HVL-F20AM
|
||
kevinbm
Senior Member
Joined: 23 September 2008 Location: Peterborough UK Online Status: Offline Posts: 1244 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 14:21 |
|
I thought they were pretty good "bang for buck". Used to have a Tokina 400mm ATX prime which was excellent and so sharp. Only sold it because it was too heavy alongside my (then) Sigma 500mm APO. |
||
|
All the best
Kevin FF: α900+VG, 50 1.4, 70-200G , 70-400G, 100 2.8, F42AM, F20AM CZ 24-70 2.8, 135 1.8 Minolta 17-35 2.8-4, 35G Samyang 85 1.4 APS-C: α300+VG, 18-55 3.5-5.6, 55-200 4-5.6 |
||
ricardovaste
Senior Member
Joined: 08 August 2007 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6471 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 14:22 |
|
The Tokina 300/2.8 is a terrific lens. |
||
|
FS: Manual Focus 300/4.5 & 28/3.5 PC
Kind regards, Richard ------------------------- Wedding & Fine Art Photographer, Shropshire - rharris-images.com |
||
Winwalloe
Senior Member
Joined: 17 September 2007 Location: France Online Status: Offline Posts: 1472 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 14:34 |
|
|
Then I don't really get the 1st sentence of the OP. Why FF shooters wouldn't be interested by the announcement?
|
||
|
a900, 35/2, 50/1.7, 70-210/4, 200/2.8, HVL-F20AM
|
||
ABramley
Senior Member
Joined: 29 November 2006 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1455 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 14:42 |
|
|
The current Tokina lineup is mostly APS-C and most of them (11-16, 16-50, 50-135, 12-24, 35 macro, 10-17) have never been available for Sony.
In the past they supported Minolta and had a load of FF options - these didn't stop working on Sonys once Tokina dropped support for new models! The 80-400 is definately floating around in Minolta mount and the 100macro might be, they also had fairly well regarded 28-70 and 80-200 zooms which you can still get, as well as some other stuff.
|
||
owenn01
Alpha Eyes group
Joined: 20 May 2008 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1376 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 14:45 |
|
|
In the best Homer Simpson mode - Whoo Hoo!
I also have experienced Tokina lenses in the past (Olympus MF mount) and I always had very high regard for them. I too would like to try the 10-17mm WA/FE as mentioned above. I think it also indicates that Sony might be being seen as increasingly 'mainstream' by Tokina which can only be good for the mount - FF or APS-C! Kind regards, Neil. |
||
|
I'll photograph anything if the light's right. 600si, VC600, 700, 5400HSS, 7D, Cos19-35, Sig28-105, sig100-300, Sig 105macro, Sig 170-500, Sony 18-250, A700 + VC, 70-210 B/can, Tamron 10-24. DT55-200
|
||
ricardovaste
Senior Member
Joined: 08 August 2007 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 6471 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 14:55 |
|
|
I always thought the 10-17mm was an interesting lens, but after seeing reviews I'm not so convinced. It seems really nicely distorted at 10mm, but upwards the distortion seems to fade off quite quickly... To which point I think most would just use it at 10mm, where the Sig 10/2.8 DT FE may be more useful. But this is just speculation from seeing reviews, nothing more.
What I find most interesting is the 11-16/2.8 and the 16-50/2.8, although I haven't seen any reviews for the former. Sorry Winwalloe, my messages are confused, but i think ABramley cleared that up. Most of their stuff today is APS-C glass, but they've made some well respected FF glass in the past. |
||
|
FS: Manual Focus 300/4.5 & 28/3.5 PC
Kind regards, Richard ------------------------- Wedding & Fine Art Photographer, Shropshire - rharris-images.com |
||
conory
Senior Member
Joined: 12 March 2009 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 558 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 15:07 |
|
|
Oooooh very nice, ill be looking forward to the cheap 80-400.
|
||
|
Sony 50/1.4
|
||
owenn01
Alpha Eyes group
Joined: 20 May 2008 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1376 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 15:33 |
|
|
I looked for a 'new' 80-400 in A-mount last year - absolutley nothing in the UK from what I could determine. Perhaps available used?
Rgds, Neil. |
||
|
I'll photograph anything if the light's right. 600si, VC600, 700, 5400HSS, 7D, Cos19-35, Sig28-105, sig100-300, Sig 105macro, Sig 170-500, Sony 18-250, A700 + VC, 70-210 B/can, Tamron 10-24. DT55-200
|
||
ABramley
Senior Member
Joined: 29 November 2006 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 1455 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 15:35 |
|
|
conory - the 80-400 is already available in Minolta mount - it's one of those that's been in production so long it predates the 'dropping Sony' strategy. Unfortunately it's not rated all that well - glacial AF IIRC. Should be in the lens database.
Edited by brettania - 29 May 2009 at 12:51 |
||
wesleysa
Senior Member
Joined: 05 October 2008 Location: South Africa Online Status: Offline Posts: 517 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 May 2009 at 15:57 |
|
|
Great news!
!!
Thanks for sharing. I've been lusting over the /2.8 range for ages. |
||
|
a200, M35-70/4, Sony 50/1.4, M70-210/4, M135/2.8
|
||
> Forum Home > Equipment forums > Lens talk area
|
Page 123 6> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the Minolta / Alpha-mount dSLR photographer.
Feel free to contact us if needed. You can support future development by making a donation.
Dyxum website


Printable Version
Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Furl
Google Boomarks
Google Buzz
MySpace
Newsvine
reddit
StumbleUpon
Twitter
Windows Live
Yahoo Bookmarks
Topic Search
Topic Options
Post Options


, but i know a lot of you are fairly dedicated to APS-C for a few years yet (like myself). I got an email from Tokina (Japan) today:

The 80-400 is definately floating around in Minolta mount and the 100macro might be, they also had fairly well regarded 28-70 and 80-200 zooms which you can still get, as well as some other stuff.
