FAQ |   |   |  Register |  Login |

Which is better - the Zeiss 135/f1.8 or the STF 135/f2.8[T4.5]
Page  12>
Author
  Share Topic |  Topic Search |  Topic Options 
mee View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 March 2007
Location: Malaysia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 473 		Post Options Post Options   Quote mee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Which is better - the Zeiss 135/f1.8 or the STF 135/f2.8[T4.5]
    Posted: 04 March 2007 at 01:32
just curious..any images to compare
Back to Top
l0cky View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 04 March 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6 		Post Options Post Options   Quote l0cky Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2007 at 02:10
sample ZA 135 ws STF photo cup



Edited by l0cky - 04 March 2007 at 02:12
Back to Top
l0cky View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 04 March 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6 		Post Options Post Options   Quote l0cky Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2007 at 02:18
photo this CAP
all INFO in EXIF

RAW+JPG
ALL PHOTO
http://rapidshare.com/files/18822149/10170301.rar 97470 KB
STF only
http://rapidshare.com/files/18821169/stf.rar 8208 KB
ZA 135 only
http://rapidshare.com/files/18821167/ZA.rar 8111 KB
2 jpeg only
http://rapidshare.com/files/18821168/ZA_STF.rar 3922 KB

Edited by l0cky - 04 March 2007 at 02:24
Back to Top
l0cky View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 04 March 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6 		Post Options Post Options   Quote l0cky Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2007 at 02:29
ZA и STF
Branch of Tree and Snow,
in archive 2 file RAW+JPEG

http://rapidshare.com/files/18898875/STF_45_1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/18898877/STF_45_2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/18898878/STF_56_1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/18898879/STF_56_2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/18898880/STF_67_1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/18898881/STF_67_2.rar

http://rapidshare.com/files/18898882/ZA_24_1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/18898883/ZA_24_2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/18898884/ZA_45_0.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/18898885/ZA_45_2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/18899052/ZA_45_SNOW.rar

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2007 at 06:09
There two totally different lens. The 135 stf is a special effect lens it has 4 different soft focus settings and is MF. The cz 135 is a super fast telephoto good for low light sport shots and portraits and even some macro shots.

Back to Top
laguire View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 November 2005
Online Status: Online
Posts: 275 		Post Options Post Options   Quote laguire Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2007 at 06:50
masterchief -- stf is not the same thing as the 100mm soft focus lens.. different lenses.. but it is manual focus.. it is a lens designed for very sharp in focus images and "ideal" bokeh for the out of focus areas. I believe the soft focus uses spherical aberration (whereas the stf uses a apodization filter).

see the excellent review stf review by mladen

but yes it is a specialty lens that is manual focus and many have reported is difficult to use with the small viewfinders of the 5d and alpha..

Edited by laguire - 04 March 2007 at 07:00
Back to Top
l0cky View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 04 March 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6 		Post Options Post Options   Quote l0cky Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2007 at 15:55
ZA135wsSTF



preview ZA135
3 JPG: ZA 135, STF & back
http://rapidshare.com/files/19361296/ZA135wsSTF.rar



Edited by l0cky - 04 March 2007 at 15:55
Back to Top
gobs View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 25 August 2006
Location: Philippines
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 637 		Post Options Post Options   Quote gobs Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2007 at 16:27
The STF and the CZ135 although with the same range have a different functions/uses.

STF gives you a very creamy bokeh while the Zeiss will give a fast razor sharp pics even at wide open...
Thinking at 5Gs
Back to Top
MarkSangenito View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 31 July 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 709 		Post Options Post Options   Quote MarkSangenito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2007 at 16:53
I can certainly say that the CZ lens has faster auto focus.

Edited by MarkSangenito - 04 March 2007 at 16:54
Back to Top
m.b. View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 14 January 2007
Location: Czech Republic
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 388 		Post Options Post Options   Quote m.b. Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 March 2007 at 18:17
I just saw a Canon EF 135/2.8 softfocus lens at BH for 269 USD. (and it's AF) A comparison between different manufacturers would be interesting too.
Back to Top
gobs View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 25 August 2006
Location: Philippines
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 637 		Post Options Post Options   Quote gobs Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 March 2007 at 04:39
Originally posted by m.b.

I just saw a Canon EF 135/2.8 softfocus lens at BH for 269 USD. (and it's AF) A comparison between different manufacturers would be interesting too.


soft focus is dirfferent from smooth transition focus
Thinking at 5Gs
Back to Top
hotwire View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 28 August 2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 820 		Post Options Post Options   Quote hotwire Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 June 2009 at 21:29
Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I am now pondering the question of whether to augment my 135 STF with the ZA.

Someone give me a reason why I don't need to, especially given my current lens lineup.
a900; a700; a100; Maxxum 9
Carl Zeiss: 16-35, 24-70/2.8, 135/1.8; Minolta: 50/1.4; MC58/1.2; 85/1.4GD 300/2.8; 500/8; Tam: 90/2.8M; Sig: 12-24/4.5-5.6; 15/2.8; Sony: 35/1.4G; 135STF, 70-200/2.8G
Back to Top
SerdarA View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 29 January 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 537 		Post Options Post Options   Quote SerdarA Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 June 2009 at 21:39
I do not think getting a second 135mm will augment the old one. It will just compete with it to be the one you put on the camera. Why not get the 85/1.4 instead? It will augment your lineup. 85mm is a great focal length to have on both the A900 and the A700.
Back to Top
groovyone View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 27 November 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2163 		Post Options Post Options   Quote groovyone Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 June 2009 at 21:43
I use both on my A900, but the Zeiss gets a lot more use thanks to much better low light capability and AF.
A900+VG|A100IR|F58x2|F42x2|16Fish|16-35Z|24-70Z|50/1.4|70-200G+2x|135/1.8Z|135STF|Maxxum7|400si|24/2.8RS|28/2|50/1.7x2|70-210/4|100/2.8MacroD
Back to Top
Dyxum main page >  Forum Home > Equipment forums > Lens talk area Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0,152 seconds.

Monitor calibration strip

Dyxum.com - Home of the Minolta / Alpha-mount dSLR photographer.

Feel free to contact us if needed. You can support future development by making a donation.