Noise...which jpg size to choose ? A77 |
| Author | |
jkp1
Senior Member
Joined: 25 November 2005 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Posts: 1905 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Noise...which jpg size to choose ? A77Posted: 17 February 2012 at 06:55 |
|
Just wondering if any have view on which jpg-quality/size (6, 12, 24mp) gives the least noise ?
To make sure not to mix things together, i need to add, that it is in-camera settings i am asking for. It seems to be the current meaning that noise gets less when downsizing photos in post processing, but i am not asking for post processing, but in-camera settings. Edited by jkp1 - 17 February 2012 at 08:03 |
|
|
A100 - A700 -A77
|
|
![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
![]() |
|
jcoffin
Senior Member
Joined: 05 November 2008 Country: United States Location: Colorado Status: Offline Posts: 348 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 February 2012 at 07:23 |
|
Generally speaking, the appearance of noise will be proportional to the size. That is, the smaller the size, the less apparent noise will be.
|
|
|
Later,
Jerry. |
|
![]() |
|
russellsbags
Senior Member
Joined: 09 November 2008 Country: United Kingdom Location: Bristol,England Status: Offline Posts: 1965 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 February 2012 at 07:30 |
|
Shouldn't the noise be the same on all three? Isn't noise made by the gain needed per pixel? Whatever the setting the pixel size is the same so the gain should be the same. That said, 6mp is 1/4 of 24 so there should be 1/4 the noise.
Oh dear, I've confused myself!
|
|
|
Understand Asperger's Syndrome. Please!
|
|
![]() |
|
tpetpe
Senior Member
Joined: 30 December 2006 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Posts: 1277 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 February 2012 at 07:49 |
First i thought you were right with the second statement having previously made a preset with half the image size for low light shooting. Then i thought you were right with the first statement when looking at the results of that and a couple of other sizes where i was just comparing them on a computer screen. Unfortunatly i couldnt find a good method to measure noise so the only conclusions were subjective. The only conclusion i could make in the end was that there was more detail to be had in 24 than 13 megs but not much. I kept the 13mb low light preset anyway and still use it even though i dont think it adds much. It would be nice to hear how others have dealt with this :). Tim |
|
|
http://www.scientificillustration.net
|
|
![]() |
|
jkp1
Senior Member
Joined: 25 November 2005 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Posts: 1905 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 February 2012 at 08:03 |
|
Thanks guys,
i have updated my question....just to make it clear. |
|
|
A100 - A700 -A77
|
|
![]() |
|
Peekayoh
Senior Member
Joined: 19 January 2009 Location: United Kingdom Status: Online Posts: 2212 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 February 2012 at 10:40 |
|
I'm not sure why you would bother with the reduced size of JPEG.
It's not as if your camera does pixel binning and the larger size gives you the flexibility to print larger if needed. It no problem to downsize but not so easy to upsize and retain the quality. |
|
![]() |
|
jkp1
Senior Member
Joined: 25 November 2005 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Posts: 1905 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 February 2012 at 15:15 |
|
Sometimes its timesaving to shoot in jpg and deliver the result at once.
99.99 % of my shooting is in raw, but ..... |
|
|
A100 - A700 -A77
|
|
![]() |
|
sybersitizen
Senior Member
Joined: 04 August 2006 Country: United States Location: California Status: Online Posts: 7273 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 17 February 2012 at 15:47 |
This has been discussed pretty often here. Yes, downsampling does reduce the appearance of noise. But the noise benefit is not all that great among the three in-camera resolutions. Often, though, the native resolution of a camera is overkill for the actual need at hand, and there are other benefits of using lower resolutions. You won't use up storage space as fast. More important, I think, is that the camera responds more quickly, spending less time processing images. But the best answer is to use the resolution that meets your own needs. |
|
![]() |
|
> Forum Home > Equipment forums > Camera Talk > APS-C SLT
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the Minolta / Alpha-mount dSLR photographer.
Feel free to contact us if needed. You can support future development by making a donation.

Dyxum website
Filter posts

Topic Options
Post Options



russellsbags wrote:
