Minolta AF 80-200 F2.8 HS APO G  reviews

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: vincentyfsiew   review date: January-19-13  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

price paid:

USD 1,420

positive:

negative:

comment:

Just got a second-hand lens a couple of hours ago. Though it's almost 20 years old... I have a mint copy and enjoy it thoroughly. Slightly heavy, but sharp throughout and excellent built. Tried it on my A350 and A77. Great lens!

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 4 

user: tomiZG   review date: November-29-12  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Minolta 70-210 f4
Tamron 70-200
Sigma 70-200 HSM ii

price paid:

750 € (used)

positive:

- sharp
- white
- Minolta
- sharp
- white
- Bokeh
- light and smaller

negative:

- why haven't we met earlier?!
- 72mm, not 77mm

comment:

Now, this is what a lens should be. It's my 4th tele-zoom and the only problem with this lens I have is that I am sorry we haven't met earlier.

This lens is sharp at 200mm at 2.8 on Full frame. That says it all.

It's more compact than the other 2.8 telezooms. Focus is accurate and spot on. It has this torque sound and feeling like the beercan and other metal Minolta zooms but it's so solidly built that I don't care. Of course the Sigma HSM is a different story but the Minolta is a large upgrade for me compared to my last zoom, the hsm ii. (HSM died after 2 months use :-/ )

My only concern is the unusual filter size of 72 mm, but that's not Minolta's problem, it's mine.

Portraits are wonderful. Bokeh is wonderful. At 2.8 vignetting is prominent and setting +0,3 EV helps. But center sharpness is awesome at 2.8, at both ends.

A pro lens asking for no compromise.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 4 

flare control: 5 

user: Sonyman   review date: November-15-12  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Minolta 70-210 f4 beercan

price paid:

1000 USD (used)

positive:

All!
Incredible sharp at 2.8
Balanced weigth
the colors! OMG
Fast to focus

negative:

Mount ring only turn but cant remove

comment:

i own it! yes! Its the best lens taht i have (mmm... well, my tamron 17-50 f2.8 is great the same). The beercan was my favirite lens... until i find this minolta. I take pics at theater, ballet the most, and i love it! (the lens.. the ballet too hahaha)

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: Common Aussie   review date: November-14-12  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Tamron AT-X 828 Pro SD (KA mount)

price paid:

1250 AUD (2010 ex+)

positive:

Sharp wide open at all focal lengths, colour rendition, build

negative:

slight diffraction noticeable from F11 to F32 (see comments)

comment:

For portraiture I have found this lens excels when used at F2.8-F6.7 with subject distances up to about 12m. Skin tones and textures are rendered naturally on both film and sensor and readily compare to those shot on medium format.

Diffraction starts around F11 (my copy) which lowered the rating for sharpness. From F2.8 to F11 it is sharp at all focal lengths.

Shooting with the lens hood attached, flare is rarely an issue. It's handled well when it is encountered.

This lens delivers such beautifully smooth tones and detail I doubt I will ever part with it.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: tomiZG   review date: October-26-12  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Sigma 70-200 HSM ii
Tamron 70-200
Tamron 90
Minolta 70-210 f4

price paid:

750 € mint

positive:

Compact for a (70)80-200.
Sharp, sharpness unseen yet.
Minolta at its best.

negative:

Autofocus is a bit aggressive, like in all Minolta metal lenses.

comment:

This is my fourth tele zoom. And until I will be able to get the Sony G this is the lens I will work with.

It's seriously sharper than the Tamron Macro 90 2.8.

It's sharp at 2.8 and 200 mm. Something I didn't see so far.

Of course serious corner sharpness is not given til f5.6, and vignetting is quite prominent at f 2.8, it fades with 3.2 already and with each stop the lens opens up with total sharpness.

The mechanical aggressive focusing is something I have to get used to again (beercan like), after working with the wonderful HSM motor, but which died after using it for 3 months and I am not going back to HSM.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: 3.0   review date: October-15-12  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Tokina 70-210
Tamron 28-75 f/2.8
Tokina 28-70 f/2.8
Sigma 50 f/1.4
Sigma 90 f/2.8

price paid:

1250CAD (Used)

positive:

-Super Sharp
-Tank Body
-Fast Focus
-Beautiful Minolta Colors/Contrast
-Shorter/Lighter than 70-200

negative:

1.8m Min focus distance

comment:

I was very conflicted when I started looking around for a constant 2.8 in a telezoom.

For the same price or less used I could have gotten a Sigma 70-200 HSM or for even less the equally sharp Tamron 70-200.

Sigma being the better build quality and with HSM, and Tamron being high IQ but cheaper build.

Until I stumbled upon the Minolta 80-200 on ebay from Japan. I don't regret making the purchase after spending a week with the lens, and it's by far the most expensive lens I've ever bought myself new or used.

I did motion tracking at f2.8 of a car on a freeway 100m away, from my 10th floor living room window at 1/8th shutter speed. Posted pics on DPreview and it's incredible how fast the lens locked onto the car, and maintained tracking while I panned to follow the movement.

I attempted the same thing with my Tokina 70-210 and it's not even worth mentioning how bad the performance was.

This lens is worth every penny. It's solid steel but what I like about it, is it's very light and shorter than the 70-200. Making it a lot easier to handle.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: lifeispixels   review date: September-23-12  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Minolta 200mm f2.8 APO G HS

price paid:

1200 usd (mint)

positive:

- perhaps lightest and shortest of all in this range.
- Lightning speed AF torque, and spot on accuracy
- One of the sharpest and most beautiful color rendition

negative:

- doesn't accept Sony 1.4x and 2.0x APO tele-converters
- white paint is easily scratched.
- long MFD, not great for pseudo macro.
- loud AF, can be very disturbing when shooting in a quiet/silent event.

comment:

I'm extremely impressed with my copy of Minolta 200mm f2.8. However being a fixed focal, I felt the need for more flexibility in some shooting situations so I sought the Minolta 80-200 f2.8 APO G HS, knowing well what I have to sacrifice in terms of IQ.

The reason I chose this over the newer Sony 70-200 is purely because of its more friendly cost and compact size/weight.

The Minolta 80-200 doesn't disappoint in terms of image quality, AF speed, accuracy, and color rendition. It's very much on par with the excellent Minolta 200mm f2.8 APO G. The colors are superbly rich, vivid and contrasty. AF speed is extremely fast and dependable. Among the telephoto zoom lens i have in this range, I can say that the AF of 80-200 is the most spot-on. I barely have blurry images. And it makes me feel confident knowing I will not miss a moment and end up with out of focus subject. My copy requires approx +2 micro adjustment.

I haven't done any test regarding border sharpness but from many reviews I have seen so far, they all agree that border sharpness is reduced which is understandable, considering the compromise of the zoom.

I love this lens a lot and can't recommend highly enough, considering the price of a mint copy is considerably cheaper than a new Sony 70-200 f2.8. Although the Tamron 70-200 f2.8 is tempting, the old version is criticized for focusing speed and the new version while very nice is way too heavy for me.

My only grips with 80-200 is the fact that it doesn't accept both Sony 1.4x and 2.0x APO tele-converters, while the 200mm f2.8 does. The MFD is rather long and hence more suitable to people portraits and not so great for pseudo macro shots. And AF drive can be very loud when you shoot in an event that demands silence. I must switch to MF instead.

When weight isn't an issue and I need extra flexibility, I will go with 80-200. When I want to travel light, and I know I will shoot mostly at the telephoto end, I will take 200 f2.8 together with teleconverters which turns the lens into 300 and 400mm super telephoto.

See my photos with Minolta 80-200mm f2.8 APO G HS and Minolta 200mm f2.8 APO G HS on my Flickr collection at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lifeispixels/collections/72157628204412995/

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 4 

user: zpi   review date: June-13-12  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

price paid:

800e (used A+)

positive:

build/weight vs size, sharpness, color, focus speed, very comfortable in hand

negative:

AF has heavy torque which will cause shaking if not mounted.
Unable to use with minolta TC

comment:

Very fast, precise AF, colors and sharpness, good choice as a cheaper alternative to 70-200G

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: Serg(vrn)   review date: January-21-12  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

price paid:

1150 usd

positive:

negative:

comment:

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: gqc   review date: December-18-11  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Beercan 70-210 f4, minolta 70-210 f3,5-4,5. Sigma 70-300 f4-5,6 APO DG.

price paid:

1,300.00 USD (used)

positive:

Lighter than Minolta, Sony 70-200 f2.8

negative:

Nothing (my opinion)

comment:

This is my favorite lens so far. It is very good wide open. It is not as heavy as 70-200 f2.8.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: dumbasadoorknob   review date: October-01-11  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Min 85/1.4G
Min 200/2.8G
Sony 70300G
Zeiss 135/1.8

price paid:

usd 849 used

positive:

Beautiful Minolta colors
Very fast focussing
Images that "pop"

negative:

Won't take Minolta tele-converters

comment:

This is a big, heavy lens that, because it balances well, just resides on my A900. I am very surprised how much more user friendly it is than the 70300G, which is lighter and slightly thinner, but not as comfortable. I haven't found the weight a problem at all in the ten days I've owned and constantly used it -- and I've recently become annoyed at big lenses. This is a delightful exception.

The cage at the back stops the usual opening of the diaphragm when a lens cap is put on, which is unexpected. I tend always to inspect my lenses this way, but it's not a big deal.

The lens stays at one length when zooming, but the focus mechanism moves the front of the lens forward. However, when the metal (Yes) lens hood is attached, the focus extension is entirely confined within the hood, so that the lens is apparently fixed in length. This pleases me no end, because I detest the huge 70300G lens hood, and the monstrous length that it extends. The 70300G's like a missile launcher.

I'd prefer a clip-on lens hood over the the bayonet fitting, because it's a little difficult to mount the bayonet backwards when done. It's a round hood, so this could've been done.

At present, I prefer this lens to the Min 200G, but this probably is just novelty. Still, the combination of wonderfully saturated color, shallow depth of field and impeccable focus on the 80200G produces images that constantly astonish me. It's a design quality that I cannot describe, but is quite clearly there.

I'd've liked a screw range limiter like the 200G (which I prefer to the switches on the 70300G.) The lens hunts a little, but that is mainly a learning curve for me. The focus is indeed as torquish as reported, and quite fun.

The rotating but irremovable tripod mount has two different, standard, screw holes (a very thoughtful point) and does indeed fit into the hand conveniently.

It takes Tamron 1.4x and 2x tele-converters. There is no discernable image quality loss with the 1.4x, but there is loss with the 2x, although that may be the consequence of hand-holding the lens.

The 85G has a different image quality, almost ethereal, while the 80-200G floods the background with light, but remains vivid. They are complementary lenses,and one can easily possess both without conflict: I am not so sure about the 200G, which may be superseded by the zoom. Time will tell.

The Zeiss is a wholly different lens, with sharp, discrete images and paler colors. I am even more sold on Minolta colors with this "new" 80200G HS.

My copy has the white paint scraped through in places, and was probably hard used at some time. But you'd never know from the speed of focus or the images. It came from Adorama at a great price as the result of an eagle-eyed Dyxumite's posting. Thank you, cafe.

Again, I say how well-balanced it is that it does not feel anywhere near as heavy and large as the statistics show.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: MRI   review date: June-26-11  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

70-210 f/4 (Beer Can)

price paid:

1200.00

positive:

Sharp
Fast Focus
Great Colors
Well Built

negative:

None for Me

comment:

This this lens is just awesome. Even when I was shooting film with my 8000i
I thought my beer can was all I would ever need. Switching to digital I was really happy, but I got a chance to get a good used copy (looks almost brand new)
of the 80-200 Hs APO and the difference between the beer can is just incredible.
If I had not shot the pictures I may not have believed the difference, as some others have stated here it elevates your pictures to a new level. Yes it is heavy
and it is worth every bit the extra weight you carry around. If you have been shooting pic since the 70's as I have it does not seem all that heavy, and some have said there seems to be alot of noise with focus, it does not seem loud to me. With the price going up all the time on new as well as used equipment if you find a good clean copy and need the range of this lens get it.

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 4 

flare control: 4 

user: zedthedragon   review date: June-26-11  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

- Minolta 70-210 3,5-4,5

price paid:

900€

positive:

- Fast
- usefull on Apsc or FF
- Sharp, and at F4 it's amazing
- White :)

negative:

Can't see, heavy, but who cares ?

comment:

One of my favorite. Excellent on Apsc but even more better on FF camera. I use it for portrait and nature shots. Love the speed on FF, the range on Apsc.

Always a great pleasure to have it in front of any Sony camera.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: leohendriks   review date: May-13-11  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

MI 100-300 apo.
Tamron SP 70-200 / 2.8

price paid:

950 euro (used)

positive:

- sharpness.
- build.
- autofocus.
- Tamron SP 1.4 TeleConv +++
- it is white.

negative:

- it is white

comment:

HOLY SMOKE!
That says it all. What an incredible lens.
I bought it secondhand to replace my Tamron 70-200 and what a good choice that was.
Autofocus is VERY fast. There is virtually no hunting.
Image quality is still very good with Tamron SP Teleconv 1.4. Autofocus remains pretty fast without hunting.
All in all: an exceptional zoomlens well worth the price.
EDIT:
I knew about the MFD and the rotating front element.
Both pose no problem. A good smooth polarizer will deal with the rotation. MFD is a matter of picking the right place for your shot.
As it is with primes.
EDIT:
It seems that micro adjust is a bit different for "< 3mtr focus" and for "> 5 m focus"? Funny! It is a minor issue.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: Bob Socko   review date: March-22-11  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

* Beercan
* Sony 55-200mm f/4-5.6
* Sony 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 SSM G
* Sony 70-400mm f/4-5.6 SSM G
* Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8

price paid:

1100 USD (used)

positive:

* Sharp wide open.
* Minolta colors.
* Focuses very quickly.
* Great build.
* Slightly shorter than modern 70-200mm zooms.

negative:

* Can't remove the tripod mount.
* Front element rotates while focusing.
* Somewhat long MFD.

comment:

There are times when a narrow-aperture telezoom just won't cut it. I used the Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 for awhile, and for the most part, it was a solid performer. Image quality was great, with good color and sharpness. And honestly, the focus speed wasn't bad either. The problem was when it lost focus - it would take what seemed like forever to rack back and forth, and it caused me to to miss shots from time to time. The Minolta 80-200mm f/2.8 HS G fixes that. It's not that it never loses focus - it does, all lenses do. But, it's geared for such quick focusing that when it does happen, you snap back to focus almost immediately.

Color and sharpness are great, as is the build. It actually takes up slightly less room in my bag than the Tamron did, and certainly less than the Sony 70-400. Though the minimum focus distance is long, this isn't the type of lens I typically use for close-ups, and I have a dedicated macro lens - so it's no biggie to me. I wish I could detatch the tripod foot, but again, it's not the end of the world.

If you're willing to buy a Tamron or Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8, give this lens some thought. For only a few hundred more, you're getting the best of both worlds - the great color and image quality of the Tamron with the fast focus of the Sigma. It's a fantastic combo.

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 4 

user: Param   review date: February-26-11  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

None

price paid:

1000 USD (used nice)

positive:

Colours
Smooth Bokeh
A Filmic Feel on DSLR
Build Quality

negative:

AF noise
Rotating Front Element

comment:

All,

There is something magical about this lens. I read somewhere this lens can create allusive three dimensional effect. It is not up to me judge if it does or not, but nowadays everything is about possibilities.

At some point I was seriously contemplating to sell it because of AF issues and noise. But after upgrading my A900 to firmware 2, I dropped the idea as the focus speed has improved dramatically.

Where I used it most is for indoor low light situations. I am always amazed about the brightness and richness of the pictures even under mixed light conditions. With anti-shake on it is possible to get HQ pics at 1/30 even 1/15 of a second at 320ISO. It is also remarkable lens for candid street shot.

Additionally I found it handles contrast well, even on a bright sunny day I have plenty of highlights to work with.

Highly recommended, unless one really needs the Sony 70-200 SSM features (which I briefly tested in Hong Kong) this lens with deliver fine pictures and with an extra skill and sensitivity it will turn into a looking glass pointing at the world burdened by the madness of contemporary civilization.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: cruiser   review date: February-26-11  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Sony 70400 SSM
Sony CZ 135mm

positive:

+sharp
+look & feel
+fast AF
+lovely bokeh

negative:

-noisy AF

comment:

I'm impressed. If one can fall in love with a lens at first sight, this is the lens. The look & feel is G all over. I fits better in my hand than the 70400 SSM. AF is fast and accurate but compared to SSM a bit noisy. Colors are warmer than with the CZ 135mm and show more contrast. Sharpness seems to be on par with the 70400 SSM (which is excellent). Its amazing that this lens has been introduced in 1993 and still kicks.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: Pirate   review date: January-27-11  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Tamron SP 70-200mm AF F/2.8 LD Di (IF) Macro
Minolta AF 300mm F4 APO HS G
Minolta AF 300mm F/2.8 APO
Sigma AF 100-300mm F4 EX DG (IF) APO
Sigma AF 70-200mm F/2.8 EX APO
Sigma AF 120-400mm F/4-5.6 OS DG APO HSM

price paid:

£550.00 (bundled)

positive:

Build quality
Sharpness
AF speed
Colour rendition
Bokeh
AF lock button
Easy to hand hold

negative:

Not the quietest of AF motors
Tripod mount very close to lens body
Not much to moan about really is there?

comment:

(UPDATED): This lens is tack sharp with great colour rendition, buttery smooth bokeh, quick AF, excellent build quality and a fabulous bit of kit.

This was one of the finest lenses I've owned and used (maybe second only to the Minolta AF 300mm F/2.8 APO), and really can't add to comments already posted. It was a semi-permanent fixture to my A700 and later on the A850. A brilliant optic and arguably the best in it's focal range.

EDIT: I've since sold the Minolta AF 80-200mm F/2.8 APO HS G lens. Included in the delivered bundled price was a very nice Minolta 7D DSLR and a decent copy of the Minolta AF 24-105mm (D) lens. Bargain or what? I made a fortune on the re-sale.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: bigjt   review date: October-12-10  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Sony 50mm f1:4
Sigma70-300dg apo
Minolta 135f2:8

price paid:

815 GBP

positive:

Fantastic build quality
Sharp throughout range
Great minolta colours
Great portrait zoom

negative:

MFD

comment:

Thanks to Puddleduck ( Andy ) i now own this lens.
Sharpness - It really is sharp even wide open and stays great throughout its range and at all focal lengths
Build quality - its built like a tank and just oozes quality
Handling - I found the torque a little unnerving at first but now i love it. Really fast focusing....almost never hunts.
This lens is a classic. If you can get it at a good price ( as i think i did ) buy it you will not be dissapointed.
I LOVE this lens!!!

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: Janneman1967   review date: June-27-10  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

70-400 SSM
100-300 3.5-5.6 APO

price paid:

600 EUR (USED)

positive:

Sharp, Fast, Everything

negative:

Can't use minolta tc's.

comment:

Just love this lens. Only problem with my copy is i dropped it on a concrete floor. Optics are still ok but the fall did not do it any good. Don't think i will be able to sell it.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: PeteMag   review date: March-31-10  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

beercan
big beercan
100 f2
28-135mm

price paid:

800 L

positive:

sharp
quick
accurate
colour
build quality
bokeh

negative:

nothing

comment:

This lens is well worth its high status, I've not found a problem at any focal length. I have also used it in testing conditions and it produces the goods every time. Images come to life with the contrast and colours this lens produces. Genuinely sharp at 2.8 rather than simply usable.

Will never be convinced that selling this is an option, unless Sony releases a 50-250 G f1.8 for under L1000...!

sharpness: 4 

color: 4 

build: 4 

distortion: 4 

flare control: 4 

user: brororn   review date: March-13-10  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX
Minolta 200/2.8 APO

price paid:

790 EUR (used)

positive:

Fast focusing, optically good

negative:

Heavy, rotating heavy front element

comment:

A very good fast tele zoom. Focusing is fast and accurate but due to heavy front element the inertia makes the feeling not so nice. Some CA at longer focal lenghts.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: Epic Win   review date: February-04-10  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

200/2.8 HS APO. Slightly heavier, slower than 200/2.8 in focusing but similar quality.

price paid:

950 USD (used)

positive:

Sharp + Fast focus + Colors + Metal hood + sturdy build

negative:

MFD. Front element rotates. Lens changes length. Non removable tripod collar

comment:

I bought this lens yesterday from eBay in slightly beat up condition, but optics are great, and focusing ring as well as zoom ring is smooth and lens takes amazingly sharp pics.

Torque is not uncomfortable, as some reviews may have suggested.

UPDATE:
I've been using this lens for a while now and it is going strong. My only problem is the large MFD. Colors and sharpness are great. I am having doubts whether the so called 'upgrade' to 70-200 SSM is worth it because the screw mount HS has lasted for so long.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 4 

flare control: 5 

user: Minoltista   review date: December-30-09  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Minolta 100 F/2.8 Macro RS
Sony 70-200 F/2.8 SSM
Sigma 70-200 F/2.8
Tamron 70-200 F/2.8

positive:

Very Sharp F/2.8!!!
Focuses Very Fast!!!
Tank Build
Color from Classic Minolta Lens!
HS works on Film Minolta Cameras!

negative:

AF not quite as Sony 70-200 F/2.8 SSM
Diamameter of 72 instead of 77 like the G lenses Minolta/Sony

comment:

Well, I just had for triyng this wonderful sample of this great piece of lens and I was curious about it.

I wanted to buy a luminous (F/2.8) zoom tele and I tested various lenses (Sigma, Tamron,Sony)

The one I've not tested is the Minolta 70-200 F/2.8 SSM lens but I suppose it's very close to the Sony version.

Well, since I tryed this wonderful piece of lens I loved it: AF is the fastest,absolutely sharp at F/2.8, and very well builded.

About the weight? If you want "quality" you have to carry it!

Ciao,
MP

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 4 

flare control: 4 

user: pegelli   review date: October-23-09  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Beercan
Big Beercan
200/2.8 HS

positive:

Sharp,
well built
fast (aperture and AF

negative:

1.8 m MFD
Rotating front element when focussing
Heavy

comment:

If you can stand the price and the weight it's a very good telezoom that wide open is almost as sharp as the 200/2.8HS, stopped down the difference is almost gone. It gives a very nice color rendering and without any PP the pictures already pop off the screen or paper. It's definitely sharper and resolves than the beercan and big beercan, that are also very good lenses. The biggest drawback is 1.8 meter MFD.

Distortion seems low but if you "correct" it with PTLens you still can see a noticable improvement.

Sony/Minolta APO converters don't fit, but I get very good results with the kenko pro300 1.4x converter. Only since that one is unchipped the exif gives the wrong f/l and aperture and the SSS will not be be fully effective.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: mambo   review date: October-22-09  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

min 70-210 f/4, sony 70-300 f/4.5-5.6G, min 50 f/2.8 macro

price paid:

US$1000

positive:

fast, sharp, the best zoom lens I have come across in my short life as a hobby photographer

negative:

nothing really

comment:

fantastic..........it makes my photography skills half decent.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: Josioau   review date: August-17-09  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Minolta 100-400mm f/4.5-6.7 APO; Minolta APO 200mm f/2.8.

price paid:

1,334 USD used/mint

positive:

Brilliant optics and functionality, solid build, very fast focus, great image quality.

negative:

Tripod mount collar not removable, tripod mount can't be accessed if vertical control grip fitted (A700). Won't take the Minolta APO teleconverters.

comment:

This is a serious lens that yields seriously good image quality and does exactly what it is designed to do. Although considerably heavier than the APO 200mm f/2.8 the zoom range makes it very versatile for all kinds of low light shooting where you need to frame the image using the zoom and can't move closer or further from your subject. The image quality and focus speed are the equal of the fixed focus 200mm f/2.8 APO. Sharper and faster than the 100-400mm APO. Highly recommended to all Alpha mount users.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: seagr112   review date: July-07-09  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Beercan
200/2.8 APO

price paid:

1200 usd

positive:

Fantastic IQ
Durable Build
Quick AF
Great Styling & Color

negative:

Rotating Front Element
A Heavier Lens
No Minolta TC Compatibility

comment:

I've had this lens for a few years now and despite its heavier weight, it is a mainstay in my bag. Occasionally it is replaced by the 200 APO if weight is a critical issue.

It is a sharp lens with fantastic IQ and I simply recommend that you get one if it is within your budget. I haven't used the SSM tele, (I'm sure it's sweet!) but I really have no desire to upgrade from here.

The AF is fast and torquey - you can feel it twist as it focuses.

Some members are quite vocal about their dislike of the Minolta white colors on these APO lenses, but frankly, I love the look. The design of this lens is awesome and I'm over being noticed with a white lens and the attention it can get.

Everything else has been already said, so that's it on this one. It really is a great lens.

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: MinoltaMad   review date: July-07-09  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Minolta 85 f1.4 G D
CZ 24-70 f2.8 SSM
KM 28-75 f2.8 D
Tamron SPAF 70-200 f2.8 Di LD (IF) macro
Tamron SPAF 17-35 f2.8-4 Di LD (IF)
Minolta 75-300
Minolta 35-70 f3.5-4.5
Sony 18-70 DT kit
Minolta 28-70 f2.8 G

price paid:

$1500 AUD used mint

positive:

sharpness (amazing for a zoom)
colour
image quality
focus speed
many applications
they don't make them like this anymore
flare control is excellent for a zoom

negative:

weight
no genuine teleconverters
minimum focussing distance

comment:

Again one of the "classic" minolta lenses which deserves its reputation. Works brilliantly on both the a900 and a700 - great image quality on the a900! Quality of image and colour a match for the "newer" KM and Sony 70-200 versions and with the extra something special (ethereal quality in certain light). Obviously it is very heavy and the minimum focussing distance can be a bit of a pain but they are minor issues really. Sharper than the 28-70 f2.8 G from the same vintage. An amazing lens. Keeps pace with all of the newer offerings

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: XB99   review date: July-02-09  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

SIGMA AF180mm
Sigma AF 105mm

price paid:

1200€ Germany

positive:

sharpness
boked
construction

negative:

noise of AF
effect of the tork in the hand
Mini distance too long

comment:

The first G I get.A superb lens ,old today for the noise and perhaps the quality but I like it .Egal to the sharpness of a Sigma 105 and 180mm but speeder.
Always I am surprised by the efficiency of this lens.
Colors are very pure.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 4 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: ch1waner   review date: June-07-09  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Beercan
Minolta 75-300D
Minolta 28-135

price paid:

600 USD (used)

positive:

Sharp
Nice colors
Fast AF
Good CA correction

negative:

Takes a lot of space
AF is loud

comment:

Image quality is very good - i like the colors of the lens just from the camera. It has good contrast and saturation.
It's a heavy lens but i still often take it with me.

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: TELLIAM   review date: May-31-09  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Minolta 200 f2,8 G HS
Minolta 75-300 (4,5-5,6)

price paid:

1218 € (new)

positive:

fast AF
Hood
sharpness
full metal and very robust

negative:

weight
front rotating element
focus ring with clearance

comment:

compared to the 75-300 , this zoom can be used at full aperture ( f2,8 ) without problem .

Compared to 200 f2,8 , this lens does not accept teleconverter and the weight is too high for handyshoot .

I continue to use this zoom for portrait and sport like tennis but I prefer the prime 200 f2,8 for wild life with the possibility to increase focal with TC .

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: karchon   review date: May-14-09  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Beercan
Sigma 70-210 f4-5.6
SAL 75300
SAL 70-300G

price paid:

1250 USD

positive:

-Vivid Minolta Colors
-Sharp all around
-Fast Focusing

negative:

-Weight (especially for long shoots)

comment:

I got a minty/brand new copy. Not one spec of dust! I love this lens and baby it way too much. The colors are so vivid and bright. The sharpness is excellent wide open. Focusing Locks on fast. There's not much said here that hasn't been said. I only dread wearing this around my neck with my setup. It's just so darn heavy.

I need to use this lens more to give a thorough review, but from the events I've shot, this lens is a keeper. I wouldn't ever sell it. Get one if you can. :)

UPDATE July, 7 2009: Having shot some more events, this lens is an absolute must have for me. The two biggest strengths with this lens for me is its focusing speed, and its sharpness at f2.8.
My primary complain about this lens is that it kills my arm for wedding shoots.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: NetQwik   review date: March-23-09  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

70-210/4 Beercan

price paid:

1350 USD

positive:

Speed
Build
Bokeh
Sharpness

negative:

Weight (As expected)
Non removable tripod collar

comment:

I have one of the first versions of the High Speed 80-200. Mine has the focus lock but not the "High Speed" lettering. The high resolution of the a900 really shows any flaws in the optics of a lens but with the 80-200 G there just aren't any. It would be nice if it were a little lighter but that would cheapen the build. The weight is worthy of the quality. I'd like to have the SSM so I could use the high end TC's but with the price difference, I'm sure I wouldn't get my money's worth and the motor in the SSM runs down the battery much faster. The digital flash integration of the SSM doesn't mean much to me because I don't use this lens for flash photography anyway. As everyone scrambles to buy SSM's more and more of these are becoming available at reasonable prices. Anyone considering the 70-200 SSM should really give this lens a look before dropping all that coin.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: I Inspiron   review date: March-14-09  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Tamron 70-200/2.8
Sigma 70-300/4-5.6 APO DG Macro

positive:

sharp
amazing bokeh
great colours
solidly built
Fast and accurate AF

negative:

paint chips off easily
rubber grip has some play (at least on my copy)
MFD
rotating front element

comment:

Before I bought this lens I had the Tamron 70-200/2.8, which I returned because of inconsistent AF-performance. Luckily I found a used Minolta 80-200 HS and I have to say this lens is in another league. AF is fast and accurate all of the time, there is no hunting unless you put the lens in very extreme situations. The colours and the bokeh are as good as they can get with a zoom and the sharpness is excellent at all apertures (although there is a slight drop at 200mm and f2.8, but still usable)

The MFD can be annoying from time to time but then again a 70/80-200 2.8 lens is not a macro lens. Also my lens is not in a very good shape cosmetically, but as long as it takes good photos it doesn't annoy me

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: BROGUEIRA   review date: February-01-09  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

sigam 70-200 2.8 DG

positive:

Beautiful colors, very fast af, sharp

negative:

minimal focus distance

comment:

Beautiful colors, at 80 - 100 makes very good portraits. Also suitable for indoor sports because is a fast lenses, fast AF and beautiful bokeh.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: petesidewalk   review date: October-11-08  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

K/M 75-300 Big Beercan
K/M 35-70 4
Sony 18-70 Kit Lens
K/M 50 1.7
K/M 70-210 4.5-5.6
K/M 70-210 4 Beercan
K/M 28 2.8
K/M 28-80xi
K/M 28-135 4-4.5
K/M 35-70 3.5-4.5
Tamron 200-400 5.6 LD NEW
Sigma 75-200 2.8-3.5
Deitz 28-200
Tamron 20-35 3.5-4.5
Angenieux 28-70 F2.6

price paid:

1300 USD

positive:

Amazing sharpness
Unbelievable image quality
Great hood
72mm filter
Blazing fast autofocus

negative:

none, not one

comment:

Where do I start. I love this lens. I was in the camera shop the other day, and got to hang out with a Sony rep who had 2 pelican cases (orange) with over 50,000 dollars worth of Sony's finest lenses. I tried every one I could. (see A900 shipping from sonystyle.com forum) I got to handle and take pictures with a Sony A900 serial number 000000. I provided a pic on that thread. I attached the 70-200 SSM to my A100. Then, my 80-200 HS G (for gold, as in the best) I noticed it was sharper at close zoom and it focused faster than the SSM. The rep offered to buy it from me, that is the truth. It has gorgeous elements and incredible performance. The case liner is draped in royal purple, quite fittingly. I could go on about how great it is, but anyone who has owned one knows what I mean. One I won't be selling.

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 4 

user: wolfy   review date: September-18-08  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Beercan 70-210
Sigma 70-300 dl

price paid:

1900US (new old stoc

positive:

Sharp
Fast focusing
Well built
Nice colour

negative:

Front rotating element
Nearly 2m min focussing dist

comment:

Sharper than Beercan, much sharper than Sigma, super fast focusing. Colour and contrast is very good.

For those who love filters, be aware the front element rotates. I love this lens otherwise.

Update: flare can be a problem in some situations. If possible it seems to work better on the A900 than the A700.

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 4 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: HPG   review date: August-02-08  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Sony 70-200 mm f2.8 G SSM
Tokina 80-200 mm f 2.8 ATX pro

price paid:

950 €

positive:

Fast AF
Sharpness
Colors
Small for a 80-200 mm
Bokeh
It is a G!
Quality of construction with exception the painting!!

negative:

Minimum focus distance 1.8 m
Rotating front element
Cannot use Sony TC
Painting

comment:

A good lens I recommend any one that cannot buy the version of Sony 70-200 mm 2.8.
This lens is a classic.
Attention use only UV quality filters!

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: camfan   review date: June-11-08  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

CZ16-80
24-105(D)
100-300 APO
70-200SSM

price paid:

120000 JPY

positive:

Fast AF
Sharpness
Great Colors
Boken
Size for relative focal range

negative:

Minimum focus distance
Front Rotating when focus

comment:

80-200G is a great lens. It's sharpness from F2.8 and wonderful colors deeply impressed me. And the build quality is very good except its rotating front when focus.
To my surprise, its AF speed is higher than that of 70-200ssm, while the latter can focus much more quitely. But, to me, AF speed is much more important so that the noise doesn't bother me much.
The only thing that bothers me is its 1.8m minimum focus distance. Fortunately, I don't take close-up pictures that much.
Anyway, this is the best lens I've ever used. I love it.

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: LuisLopes320   review date: June-03-08  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Minolta 28-70 G
Sigma 70-300mm Macro 4-5.6
Minolta 50mm f/1.4

price paid:

about 250€

positive:

Extra FAST Focus
Sharpness
Contrast and Micro contrast
BOKEN
COLORS
Construction
Focus button
White color =)
Compact for type of lens
Doesn't extend

negative:

Weight
Close focus distance
Paint jumps out
Brutal focus

comment:

First of all, quite close to perfect lens.

Yes it's heavy, it's supposed to be, it's got glass, paint it's not the best (doesn't influence performance) but it's well sealed lens, and focus could be smoother, but than it's fast, you can't miss a photo. Why is it not perfect, well close distance is too long, something it shares with it's cousin 28-70mm f/2.8 G (that is even worst than this one).

This lens is compact, has an huge IQ, very very good sharpness, best at 80 f/5.6 where it is emaculate perfection as good as 50mm f/4 in 28-70G and better than 50 f4.5 in 50f/1.4. Excelent contrast and micro contrast.
Like G stands for, this quality minolta lens has superb BOKEN and COLORS, never seen one like it, although 28-70 G comes pretty close but hasn't got the zoom.
It terms of speed focus, it can even make a Minolta 7D focus really fast and that's saying alot

All in all my favorite photos are taken with this lens.

Oh and don't compare it with lens out of its category, it is so much better. Only the beercan in terms of value, the rest is way worst. My sigma 70-300 didn't look bad in Minolta 7D 6MP sensor but in A700 it really sucks, i can do a digital 2x crop to a image of this 80-200 G and it looks a lot better than Sigma at 300.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 4 

user: km-7d   review date: May-08-08  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

minolta 28-75d
sigma 17-35 ex dg
minolta f4 {beer can}
sigma 50mm macro
minolta 50mm f1.7
minolta md mount mc rockkr pg58mm f1.2

price paid:

$1600.usd nib

positive:

solid
very very fast fun and sharp
did i say fast?

negative:

nothing much just the non removable tripod collar

comment:

awsome lens love it great for low light. the olny real problem is they keep going up in price. it fits great on my km-7d and vc7d. Great for photojurnlism and over all the best lens ive ever shot with...

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: kaisal0   review date: March-25-08  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

4/200 G
1,4/85 G
1,8/135 G
2,8/ 28-70 G
2,8 70-210 Sigma

price paid:

1300 Euro

positive:

Sharp, fast AF, great colours, relative small for a 80-200

negative:

Weight, but quality is heavy!!
Minimum distance of 1,8 m
Can´t use it with converter

comment:

This is a great lens. The image Quality is so great. I think this is the best zoom lens Minolta every built. The shaprness and colors are great.
I love it...

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: troublestylist   review date: March-25-08  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

70-200SSM
Beercan

price paid:

1000

positive:

COLOR!
Speed of focus
Sharpness
Bokeh

negative:

Size

comment:

Every time I use this lens, the colors amaze me. No PP required. I can print on the spot (portable printer) and have show-quality output. Much more saturated than the beercan. Focuses as fast (or faster) than the SSM. The SSM I compared it to was also softer wide open, but it may have been a bum copy.

No need to upgrade for me...ever.

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 4 

user: ja   review date: November-21-07  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

positive:

negative:

comment:

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 4 

user: Jlav   review date: October-08-07  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Nikon 70-200 2.8
Pentax 80-200 4.7
Min 35-105. 3.5-4.5

price paid:

1100 CAD

positive:

Fast
Great colour
Awesome bokeh
Sharp
Sturdy construction

negative:

Rotating front element,
Only third party tc

comment:

Complaints were made that the tripod mount won't remove. Though it adds to the weight, it positions the hand nicely to operate the zoom ring. The focus is fast and responsive. Some would say too responsive, but that is what the hs is for. Combined with the a100 stupid eye sensor focus gadget, you shouldn't miss tha fox you just missed taking off through the woods.

Though some of the features on this lens realy come into their own in sports photography and wildlife, it is also an excellent portrait lens.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: DaveK   review date: September-10-07  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

- 200mm 2.8 APO HS
- 300mm 4.0 APO HS

price paid:

1000 Euro

positive:

- Bokeh
- Image quality
- Sharpness
- Colour

negative:

- It's so HUGE

comment:

I love this lens, although I realy had to get used to it.

Sometimes AF isn't accurate on my A100, but when it's sharp, it's sharp!!! The only zoom I use.

It's huge. People often ask me if I work for a newspaper when I use it.... It's hard to stay not noticed. It makes a lot of noise. You'll hear it working hard.

Great lens! Really wanted a Sony 70-200SSM, but this one stays, so the next purchase will be..... the A700....

Update: Sold it to purchase a CZ 2470 to a fellow Dutch dyxumer who loves it even more than I did!

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: laguire   review date: September-03-07  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

sigma 70-210/2.8, sigma 70-200/2.8 ex, minolta beercan, minolta 85/1.4, tamron 90/2.8

positive:

Almost as sharp as primes, colors, contrast, beat third party lenses.

negative:

have to use third party tc's, bokeh can be harsh at times.

comment:

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: tankm   review date: July-15-07  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Minolta 70-200 f2.8 SSM

positive:

Image quality.
Focus speed.
Bokeh.

negative:

Heavy (expected).
Non-removable tripod collar.
Minimum focus distance is 1.8m.
Single focus-hold.

Rotating front element.
Cannot use Minolta/SONY TC.

comment:

Good lens if you like the range and not willing to pay more for the SSM version. Focus speed is fast and I do "feel" it slightly faster than the SSM. The minimum focus distance can be a limiting factor in some occasion.

IQ is identical to the SSM with nice sharpness, contrast, color and bokeh. Depend on location, the AF sound can be considered loud. During AF you will feel the torque of the motor and it's important to hold the lens firmly. Price of this lens is creping up. It's still much cheaper than the SSM both used and new.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: sup_geeh   review date: July-04-07  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Canon 70-200 f2.8 L
Nikon 70-200 f2.8 VR

price paid:

$850 eBay 4yrs ago

positive:

Optical Quality
Build
Focus Speed
Color Reproduction

negative:

Noisy Focus
Focus Hunts Sometimes
Aggressive Focusing
The Minimal Focusing Distance
Paint Chips off easily
Doesn't take Minolta TCs

comment:

This is my baby...I was lucky when I bought this lens. I bought it at a time when many were leaving the Minolta system and before the announcement of the 7D. My first G lens to own, I was fortunate to shoot with three other G lenses so I had high expectations for its performance. I find the portrait shots from this lens, far more preferable than the Canon or Nikon options, though I like the USM and AF-I motors of their respective manufacturers...it certainly took too long to see the SSM version. But IMHO, I don't know of any other manufacturer with a better bokeh than Minolta G lenses. The noisy focus doesn't really bother me as much as the focus hunting (when it does) makes the camera sound strange on my 7D with the motor trying to confirm focus. Optically, well I'm preaching to the choir here, it's amazing...my friend calls it the zoom lens the God made, haha. All in all, it's a worthy perfomer, especially of the rarity of the SSM version or the insane price of the Sony version. I find it appalling that many on the used market are being bought and sold for it's brand new price...sheesh.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: gsaronni   review date: July-02-07  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

200/2.8
70-210 f4
70-210 f3.5-4.5
100-300 APO D

positive:

G quality
Cover what you expect from it
Colours
Sharpness
Fast, fast, fast

negative:

At 200mm is less sharp than my 200/2.8, but this is normal
Too heavy for walkabout photography
Minimal focus distance

comment:

A lens that I always dreamt to own.

I sold because some economic problems and because I have a 200/2.8 too, and I think I was not using enough for what I paid for

Another question I dislike is the 1.8m minimum focus distance

Be prepared for the weight of this massive zoom

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 4 

user: gm4jjj   review date: June-17-07  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Sigma 70-300mm APO DG f/4-5.6
Minolta Big Beercan 75-300mm f/4.5-5.6

price paid:

1500 USD used (Japan)

positive:

Wonderful sharpness/colour/bokeh

negative:

Tripod collar not removable
Rotating front element

comment:

My first G lens and I'm seriously impressed. Never thought I would own such a lens, but I managed to find one on Ebay in Excellent+ condition.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: Anssisa   review date: May-31-07  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

- Crappy telezooms and sharp primes

price paid:

1200€

positive:

- Image quality even at F2.8
- Focus Speed
- Colours
- Build Quality

negative:

- Rotating front filter
- Minimum focus distance
- only one focus hold button
- no dedicated tc for this one

comment:

Ive now had mine for half a year, and this one is the lens that i used the most. I got one in mint condition, and i have not scraped any paint of it my self. This is a heavy lens, im young and the weight really does not bother me, but it can be too much for some ppl. This lens is a blast to use, and it inspired me greatly to improve my photography skills.

The negatives for this lens are all fixed with the SSM, but for the price, i think ill keep to this one, its the image quality that matters, and this gives more than sufficient results. Also this one has more great things then negatives, and they are not really negatives, just features. :)

The minimum focus distance has not bothered me, but i know its there. No problem recommending this lens, especially if you need an F2.8 zoom. All things said about 'G' is true ;)

// Update // 3.4.2009
After time has passed, i still own this lens and im more than happy with it. Its a lens that i will not sell easily. Its blazing fast on A700 and all that i said before it still delivers. A keeper for me.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: nicj   review date: May-09-07  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

price paid:

1250 USD (mint)

positive:

Bokeh
Fast
IQ / color rendition
Build

negative:

Tripod collar
Brutal focusing, but that's because of the speed

comment:

Incredible lens. The very creamy bokeh makes you forget the price (almost)! It's fast in more than one meaning and the sharpness is really very close to high quality primes I've used in the past on other mounts. Not much difference with the SSM version in terms of speed (slightly faster actually), but it is also more brutal.

Sony Alpha 100
Minolta - AF 80-200 F2.8 HS APO G
Tamron - SP AF 17-50 F2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical
Sigma - 18-200 F3.5-6.3 DC
Sony - AF 50 F1.4
Sony - AF DT 18-70 F3.5-5.6
Sigma - EF 500 DG SUPER

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 4 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 4 

user: monte920   review date: April-16-07  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Sigma 70-200 Apo
85G(D)
Beercan
100-300 Apo G(D)

price paid:

1000USD(mint used)

positive:

Sharpness
Color
Contrast
Bokeh
AF speed

negative:

Flare control (see below)
Weight
Tripod color does not come off
Paint comes off easily
AF fast, but not smooth

comment:

One of the fanciest lens and overpriced at eBay. Overall performance is stellar! The color, sharpness, contrast and bokeh have very little to complain about. However it does have shortcomings:
1. Flare control: You hardly see halos or ghost flares in the pictures, that's true. But when aperture is wide open, the effect of flare causes softening and less contrast of the images. This softness is much improved when aperture is smaller than f4.0, but you do sense the softness quite often when at 200mm f2.8, especially when the image being enlarged to 1:1. I heard that Sony 70-200SSM, which is coated to maximize digital sensor performance, has improved on this issue.
2. Build like a tank. But the paint is the weakest part of the structure. It comes off here and there quite easily. You have to take care of this lens like a baby.
3. Marked as "HS", AF speed is fast. But you do sense the torque while AF ring is turning (and front element also turns). While AF is trying to trace a moving subject, you simply feel "cogwheel rigidity" of this lens!

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 3 

user: omerbey   review date: April-16-07  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

positive:

everything else than below

negative:

weight&size (normal)

Not compatible with minolta tcs

min focus distance could be shorter.

comment:

Excellent lens. Prime quality all the way. Great at 2.8, superb at 4

Honestly, I'll put it this way. If 2.8 is fast enough, if you are willing to carry this lens, this can replace every prime in the range. sharper than 85 1.4, as sharp as 100:2 slightly inferior to 200 2.8

Af is pretty fast, in fact probably as fast as it gets in minolta mount. rarely hunts.

If you are willing to deal with the weight and tc issues, highly recommended.

Oh, and it sadly flares inside the barrel.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 4 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: revdocjim   review date: March-23-07  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

beercan, big beercan, 200/2.8G

price paid:

US$975

positive:

Sharp, fast, accurate, not too heavy, creamy bokeh, great colors

negative:

non-removeable tripod collar
rotating front element
missing focus lock button for portrait orientation
no focus limiter
no focus ring clutch or cover
doesn't take Minolta TC

comment:

This lens is great for shooting my kids at sporting events. Perfect range, especially for indoor. Awesome IQ and the flexibility of a zoom. If I know I only need 200mm then I take the 200/2.8G for the portability and slight edge in IQ, but otherwise this lens gets lots of use.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: DLNY   review date: February-03-07  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Beercan
Big Beercan

price paid:

1050 Euro

positive:

The looks
The solid feel and sound

negative:

White paint chips off easy

comment:

My first G glass lens. Inspite of reading how 'slow' the 7D focusses this lens is fast. I pointed at a gull flying by not to close and the outcome was sharp and full of detail. And that was my first day out with the lens. The colors are nice and warm too.
And the weight? What's 1,5 kilo compared to my 'beerbelly' I'm dragging around all the time ;-)

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: mike1761   review date: October-30-06  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Minolta 70-210 F4 and M 80-200 xi

price paid:

1500

positive:

Color, Focusing(lightning fast), it is a G lens, bokeh, internal focus, Sharp

negative:

Heavy (to be expected) , tripod collar can't be removed.

comment:

What else can I say about this lens that has not already been said. Beautiful, build quality is outstanding and if taken care of it should out last the camera, my car and probably me. Other reviewers have mentioned how fast the focusing is, Oliphoto even used the adjective "brutal" and I have to agree, but, in a great way. I was at the park shooting some geese, a father and son walked in front of my shot; the lens focused on them for the instant they were in my viewfinder then once out of frame locked on to the geese again. If not for the size, I would use it for my portrait and walk around lens.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: terrylloydsmith   review date: October-28-06  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Tamron 70-210 2.8
Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX DG
Beercan

price paid:

1600 USD LN

positive:

Super Sharp
Build Quality
Compact Size

negative:

Front rotates when focusing
Minimum focus too long

comment:

I wanted to purchase the 70-200 SSM but I didn't want to wait any longer and spend more money. This came up and I got fortunate and bought it.

This is the nicest lens I have ever seen, used or owned. The sharpness, color and bokeh are wonderful. The build quality is top-notch. If you want the best, this is it.

I sold this lens recently to buy the Sony 70-200 SSM. If the 80-200 had a closer minimum focus I would have never purchased the SSM. I miss it. It's that nice.

Update 10/31/10: I purchased another LN 80-200HS APO today and sold the 70-200 SSM. Why? Because I like the 80-200 HS better.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: zhuohui   review date: October-27-06  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

KM 24-70 f3.5-4.5
Sigma 24-135 f2.8-4.5
KM 50 f1.4

price paid:

$1500 (new)

positive:

Color in white tracks lots of attention.
What else I have to say, pro!!!

negative:

None

comment:

I own it more then 7 years. Had many pro-shots on my 800si and 7D. Really good in low light, supper sharp, well build, pro-looks, fast zoom, I mean every thing is good on the lens. Prime Lens.

Update: long waited for the A850 full frame finally have it, love the camera and of course this G lens still the best.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: del420t   review date: October-06-06  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

18-200 sigma

price paid:

800GBP (used)

positive:

Accuracy
Sharpness
speed of response

negative:

weight
collar

comment:

Only starting off but this lens if fast and focus is furious. Sharp Pictures and love the DOF you can obtain. Need to get used to the collar and the weight of this beast but they are minor. Ohh and the 1.5 m minimum focus but I don't think I have tried it in the right situations yet highly recommended.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: Watty   review date: September-26-06  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

100-300, 100-300APO, Canon 80-200F2.8

price paid:

L600 sterling (s/h)

positive:

Excellent

negative:

A small point, but when using the lens with a film camera with a vertical grip, the tripod collar gets in the way, so you have to move it. Doesn't affect performance, though

comment:

Can't find a thing wrong with it. Really does the job throughout the aperture range. If you want to see how the A1oo can perform, try it with one of these on the front.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: JulienHG   review date: September-22-06  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

- 70-210 f/4
- 75-300 4.5-5.6 (D)

price paid:

860 CHF (680 USD)

positive:

+ Extremely sharp
+ it's a pure G lens
+ Amazing colour rending
+ Fast... and furious!
+ Ultimate Build quality
+ Comfortable focal range
+ White!

negative:

- Weight
- Tripod collar which is permanently fixed
- Rare to find

comment:

This lens is a legend, and owning it is such a pleasure. Actually, this is the reason why I will stay in the Minolta mount for long. The fact that this lens is so rare makes it even more pleasant to shoot with it.

It's sharp... so sharp, so quick that you can finally get this super pro render in your shooting sessions. The colour rending is just amazing, with warm and realistic tones. Shooting in raw, and you 'll get the best of it (I use Capture One and the result is exaclty what I'm looking at).

The AF is fast... and furious! After few minutes shooting with it, and you'll understand to whom it had been designed... G for Pros and serious amateurs that seeks ultimate results. Working on my KM5D, I rarely use the MF.

The only minor (very minor actually) points would be its weight and the tripod collar that you can't remove. But shooting with a white lens is so nice, that you can accept everything!!! ;-)

I used to shoot with the 70-210 f/4 before, and yes it's a nice price/quality lens, but is far to be as sharp and quick that the 80-200 2.8 G! Just another league.

I made a nice bargain, as I get it for 860 Swiss Francs (680 USD), and I have no regrets at all that I jumped on it as soon as I saw it! I've doubt that you can still make such deals today, which is sad.

I use it mainly for portraits, as it gives beautiful colours, superb sharpness. For some samples, you can visit my photosig 80-200 2.8 G HS pictures:
http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/browse?id=35549

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: oliphoto   review date: July-02-06  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

positive:

Sharpness, AF, Build quality

negative:

comment:

Well, I think that this is as good as it gets. I have been playing with this lens for a couple days already, and I can safely say that this is hands down one of the very best lenses Minolta has ever produced.
Sharpness as 80mm is phenomenal: it is actually better than the 85mm f1.4G! Actually, I believe that at the setting of 80mm and f8 this is the sharpest lens that Minolta has ever released.
Sharpness at 100 is comparable to the 100mm macro. The zoom is better at 135mm than the 135mm f2.8.

The AF is... violently fast. Violently, because indeed it is quite brutal, but this has to be one of the fastest focusing lenses around.

The colors are extremely pleasing.

The build quality is phenomenal. It is extremely sturdy (and this includes the metal lens hood). The tripod collar is very convenient and helps handling the lens actually.

Get one if you can!

The only negative: the current sensors don't do a favor to this lens. My film scans show how good it is, this lens is capable of much more than a 6MP or even a 10MP can deliver!

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 4 

user: jarenas   review date: May-27-06  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Tokina 100-300 F4

positive:

feels professional, Balance range, colors

negative:

focus ring, non-locking hood

comment:

I have been enjoying this lens for about a month and I feel comfortable enought o submit my 2 cens. The Lens is a dream to use. The positive are:
72MM filter, color and sharpness, weight is tolerable, focus hold button
Neg:
hood does not lock in place so it sometimes rotates with movement, hood makes zoom ring useless unless hood is facing outward, lens cap is hard to put on if hood is facing outward, mounting ring is nonremovable.
Again, I would not trade this lens for a 70-200 beacuse it has too many great qualities and it fits perfectly in my bag.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: daxre   review date: April-04-06  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

MINOLTA:
AF 100-300 F4.5-5.6 (D) APO
AF DT 18-70 F3.5-5.6 (D)

SONY:
AF 50 F1.4 (D)

SIGMA:
AF 10-20 4-5.6 EX DC

VOIGTLÄNDER:
AF MACRO DYNAR 100 F3.2-3.5

positive:

Supreme sharpness,color & bokeh
Ultra fast AF
High quality Build
Powerfull Zoom:with Digital it's equivalent to 120-300

negative:

Heavy
Tripod collar not removable
AF at least at 5m

comment:

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 4 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: purenrg17   review date: March-13-06  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

70-200G 2.8 SSM

positive:

Fast focus. sharp image. Great deep color reproduction.

negative:

a little soft at 2.8 compared to 70-200 SSM. Paint comes off easily.

comment:

This is a great lens. I really enjoyed it myself until I got my 70-200 SSM.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 4 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: wblc   review date: February-24-06  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Minolta 70-210/4
Tamron 75-300 LD

positive:

Superb optical performance
Fastest AF in my bag
Excellent build
MF ring has good feel

negative:

Cannot remove tripod collar
Rotating front element
Focus hold button inconvenient for portrait orientation

comment:

I can't fault the optical performance of this lens in any way. Color, sharpness, bokeh, contrast, all are excellent. Wide-open performance is quite good, so I can get decent results in the lower light of indoor events.

Prior to this lens, I was used to the slower AF of the older Maxxum mount lenses. I used to think that the 50/1.4 was fast. I don't know how this lens compares to the SSM version, but it focuses quickly compared to other lenses I have.

I would rather have the tripod collar removeable. Even so, I have come to like having the flat platform settled in the palm of my hand when using this lens. Oddly enough, it gives the impression of stability.

I use the focus hold button regularly when taking sports/action shots, but only with landscape orientation. The button points straight down when taking portait orientation shots, and I end up using the AF/MF toggle on the body or the vertical grip. I would prefer to use the button on the lens all the time, particularly since the positioning of the AF/MF button feels different between the 7D body and the vertical grip.

This is certainly not a small lens, but it fits (barely) in a Lowepro Photorunner and a Lowepro Orion (two waistbelt-style bags). Even though it's heavier than the 70-210/4, I find that the size and weight difference between the two is not a factor for me. I carry the 80-200 G in my bag most of the time and seldom use the 70-210/4.

I hghly recommend this lens.


12/19/06 update: I changed the build rating to 4 from 5. Reason: negatives cited above are all aspects of the build rating, so it doesn't make sense to make build=5 if there are weaknesses in the build.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: Kasper   review date: December-21-05  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Minolta 100-300 Apo.
Minolta 70-210/4.

positive:

Fantastic lens, point sharp, fantastic color rep. Extremly fast AF.

negative:

Front element is rotating during AF. Can not be used with Minolta TC. Tripod mounting does not come off.

comment:

One of my standart lenses ( 17-35/3,5 G is the other ).
Does a great job for portrait and landscape photography.
G = fantastic

sharpness: 4.5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: Kiklop   review date: September-09-05  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

Canon 70-200L IS USM
KM 70-210/4

price paid:

650 USD (used)

positive:

Excellent image quality
great AF performance
robust build
I have it ;)

negative:

It would be nice to have a focus limiter
Front element rotates
Tripod collar not removable
Isn't compatible with Minolta TC

comment:

I was very lucky to get this lens in great conditions very cheap. If not for that I would most probably be on the waiting list for KM 70-200SSM because I need a fast and reliable lens in this range for my work.
Anyway, this lens is simply fantastic. I'm pretty conservative in rating a lens with 5, but this lens deserves that (despite some flaws).
Optically, this is a top grade lens by any means. Sharp even wide open, with excellent contrast colors and bokeh. With this lens as a reference zoom lens it's very easy to spot imperfections of most rivals.
AF is really good. This is the only zoom lens I have tried with 7D, that makes continuous focus usable. I presume it's the focusing gear that makes this possible.
I listed the main shortcomings above and KM has done a great job in improving all "flaws" in the newer 70-200SSM model.
A pity that the price of these lenses (even on second hand) will be to high for most users. It's a joy using it.
**Full frame**
For my needs this is still the best performing lens covering this range and i do not itend to replace it with the new SSM glass.

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: bengeo   review date: October-09-05  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

positive:

Fantastic lens - fast in all ways, very sharp even wide open.

negative:

Quite heavy, tripod collar doesn't come off and front filter rotates on focusing.

comment:

A couple of images taken with it and the 7D:
http://www.ukexpert.co.uk/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=15609
http://www.ukexpert.co.uk/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=12953

sharpness: 5 

color: 5 

build: 5 

distortion: 5 

flare control: 5 

user: agetan   review date: November-22-04  

tested on film camera:

tested on APS-C:6MP; 10MP; 12MP; 14MP:; 16MP:; 24MP:

tested on full frame:24MP

compared to:

positive:

Sharp
Fast
Great Bokeh
Excellen built quality

negative:

Tripod collar (can't be removed)

comment:

Well, what can I say...

This is probably the best Minolta lens you can have, it is hard to find one in second hand market. Most of the owner will just keep it once they have it.

If you see one and have the budget to buy it, don't hesitate. You will be pleased. But if you can't strecth your budget, then find the Minolta 70-210 f4.

This is my highly recommended lens.