Samyang 14mm F2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical reviews
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 3 flare control: 4 |
||
tested on film camera: tested on APS-C:6MP tested on full frame:24MP |
||
compared to: |
Tokina 19-35 |
|
positive: |
Sharp |
|
negative: |
Distortion |
|
comment: |
A very nice lens |
|
sharpness: 4.5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 4 flare control: 4 |
||
tested on film camera: tested on APS-C:6MP tested on full frame:24MP |
||
compared to: |
Tokina DX 11-16 F2.8 |
|
price paid: |
260€ |
|
positive: |
sharpness |
|
negative: |
distortion |
|
comment: |
I enjoy this lens very much, it is sharp and the focusing is very smooth. The distortion seems to be the only problem but as other reviewers have mentioned it can be corrected with PT Lens. |
|
sharpness: 4.5 color: 4 build: 5 distortion: 4 flare control: 4 |
||
tested on film camera: tested on APS-C:6MP tested on full frame:24MP |
||
compared to: |
18-55 kit |
|
price paid: |
390 USD(new) |
|
positive: |
center sharpness |
|
negative: |
Incorrect focus ring marking |
|
comment: |
This review is for the updated Samyang/Rokinon 14mm 2.8 |
|
sharpness: 4 color: 4 build: 5 distortion: 4 flare control: 4 |
||
tested on film camera: tested on APS-C:6MP tested on full frame:24MP |
||
compared to: |
|
|
price paid: |
345 USD New |
|
positive: |
Great Build |
|
negative: |
Distortion |
|
comment: |
This lens has been a nice surprise. I needed a decent wide angle to use on both my A850 and A55. I have been waiting for the new Sigma 12-24, but became impatient. I grabbed the Rokinon version of this lens and have recently put it through its paces. In my opinion, there are only two negatives with this lens. 1.Distortion requires processing to fix (PT Lens) and 2.no electronics. I ordered a chip for this lens, so perhaps that will address #2. |
|
sharpness: 4 color: 4 build: 4 distortion: 3 flare control: 3 |
||
tested on film camera: tested on APS-C:6MP tested on full frame:24MP |
||
compared to: |
|
|
price paid: |
269 EUR (new) |
|
positive: |
Sharpness |
|
negative: |
Quality Hood and Cap |
|
comment: |
I was pleasantly supprised about this lens' performance. With f2.8 it's reasonably fast, stopped down it's sharp and the build quality is very good for use in the field. Although, for a manual lens, the focus ring is a bit stiff for my taste. |
|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 4 distortion: 4 flare control: 5 |
||
tested on film camera: tested on APS-C:6MP tested on full frame:24MP |
||
compared to: |
|
|
positive: |
Sharp |
|
negative: |
"Funny" distortion |
|
comment: |
I'm very happy with this lens I must say. On a full frame camera it's astonishingly wide - less so on APS-C but still pretty damn wide. Sharpness is extremely good and it's very hard to get it to flare. I really don't find manual focus a problem with this lens because being so wide, it's very easy to set for hyperfocus using the distance marks on the focus ring. |
|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 4 distortion: 3 flare control: 5 |
||
tested on film camera: tested on APS-C:6MP tested on full frame:24MP |
||
compared to: |
Sigma 12-24 |
|
price paid: |
280 GBP (new) |
|
positive: |
Sharp |
|
negative: |
No AF or any electronics |
|
comment: |
This lens is the best value in a lens ever in my opinion. Starting at f2.8 the results are sharp, and very pleasing. The lens uses metal and plastic parts, build quality feels good and the focus ring is smooth (maybe a bit too smooth even). |
|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 3 flare control: 4 |
||
tested on film camera: tested on APS-C:6MP tested on full frame:24MP |
||
compared to: |
17-35D |
|
price paid: |
400 CDN (new) |
|
positive: |
very sharp even wide open |
|
negative: |
distortion |
|
comment: |
This lens is hard to master but really rewards you with sharp and detailed images once you learn how to use it. Full manual control really makes you think before each shots are taken. I correct distortion with PTLens in CS5 but still there are trace of diagonal distortion if you are not careful about composition. Let's talk about sharpness.. this lens is one amazing pixel resolving machine! At f/2.8, 80% of image field is already sharp! around f/5.6 almost 95% coverage becomes sharp - truly outstanding. negatives - mounting filters can be challenging. flare control is bad, and as I said earlier.. barrel distortion with a mustache-style sub-frequency. |
|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 4 flare control: 5 |
||
tested on film camera: tested on APS-C:6MP tested on full frame:24MP |
||
compared to: |
Sony 16/2.8, Sony 20/2.8, Sony 16-35/2.8, Tokina 20-35/2.8. |
|
price paid: |
430 USD(new) |
|
positive: |
- 14mm, f2.8 on FF |
|
negative: |
- Distortion |
|
comment: |
I like this lens. This lens very sharp in the center and on corners in A900. |
|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 4 distortion: 3 flare control: 4 |
||
tested on film camera: tested on APS-C:6MP tested on full frame:24MP |
||
compared to: |
17-35 mm Konica Minolta |
|
price paid: |
£290.00 |
|
positive: |
Great fun and value. Super resolution. A manual focus and aperture lens that makes you think when you are using it |
|
negative: |
Nothing considering price. Distortion can be corrected and my main use is for landscapes where it is not so much of a problem anyway. Difficult to use filters or grads with this kind of lens design |
|
comment: |
Very pleased with this inexpensive lens on my a900. The resolution is excellent and can produce some really creative images. Being fully manual it slows you down and makes you think when composing shots, no bad thing. |
|
