Sigma 28-200 3.8-5.6 UC Aspherical reviews
sharpness: 1 color: 1 build: 1 distortion: 1 flare control: 1 |
||
tested on film camera: tested on APS-C:6MP tested on full frame:24MP |
||
compared to: |
I couldn't compare it to anything |
|
price paid: |
$75 |
|
positive: |
Couldn't tell you |
|
negative: |
AF dead on A300 |
|
comment: |
Would spin up but then the AF would not engage at any distance. |
|
sharpness: 3 color: 2 build: 4 distortion: 3 flare control: 3 |
||
tested on film camera: tested on APS-C:6MP tested on full frame:24MP |
||
compared to: |
Beercan, tokina 70-210, minolta 35-70, sigma hf 28-80 |
|
price paid: |
60 US Ebay |
|
positive: |
cheap |
|
negative: |
AF is almost useless |
|
comment: |
I was very disappointed with this lens, did not meet any of my expectations. AF was very slow and half of the time didn't focus or "hunted". using it on manual focus was the only way it was usable. pictures were very low contrast. Maybe it was just my copy but would not recommend anyone to buy this lens. |
|
sharpness: 4 color: 4 build: 4 distortion: 4 flare control: 4 |
||
tested on film camera: tested on APS-C:6MP tested on full frame:24MP |
||
compared to: |
|
|
price paid: |
50 € (used) |
|
positive: |
-Price |
|
negative: |
-Low contrast |
|
comment: |
I owned this lens for some weeks and sold it because I didn't used it much. But it's a very nice "traveling-lens" for a AF that costs less than 100€. |
|
