sal-70400GII |
Page <1 7891011 13> |
Author | ||
fem2008
Senior Member Joined: 29 January 2009 Country: United States Location: Ohio - USA Status: Offline Posts: 1400 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 04 March 2013 at 23:30 | |
Although they both have 77mm filter thread, the 70-200 lens hood did not fit the original 70-400 - The mount is different. I wish it did since the 70-200 hood is much heavier and fits more securely. I hope they've changed the hood mount for the better or made it compatible with the 70-200. Perhaps Gustav can comment on this? |
||
Fem2008
My Flickr Page |
||
ijsvogel
Senior Member Knowledgebase Contributor Joined: 14 September 2008 Country: Netherlands Location: netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 1915 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 04 March 2013 at 23:41 | |
no fem , it`s the same hood as the silver one , personal i like the white colour , now after a few years this lens is finally white , and if you want ????? its very easy to paint the hood black |
||
my picture`s
www.gkiburg.nl A77 A99 SAL70-400 GII SAL300mm 2.8 SSM-G SAL500mm F4 SSM-G SAL70-400 SSM-G http://yourshot.nationalgeographic.com/profile/109172/ |
||
klw10
Senior Member Joined: 06 May 2009 Country: United States Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 1366 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 04 March 2013 at 23:58 | |
I actually like the white hood myself.
|
||
stiuskr
Moderator Group Joined: 01 September 2006 Country: United States Location: West Virginia Status: Offline Posts: 11497 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 05 March 2013 at 00:33 | |
Keeping in the tradition of the Minolta tele-primes, I like it. Now bring on the 400G Mk II!
|
||
Rob Suits Jr.
a99M2 a99 a77 a700 KM7D|Min24/2.8 Min35/2 So50/1.4 So50/2.8 Min85/1.4G Tam90/2.8 Tam180/3.5|Tam17-50 CZ24-70G2 KM28-75D So70-200G1 So70-300G So70-400G1| SonyF60 AD200R2 |
||
keith_h
Senior Member Joined: 22 May 2006 Country: Australia Location: Australia Status: Offline Posts: 3134 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 05 March 2013 at 00:44 | |
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/925817-REG/sony_sal70400g2_70_400mm_f_4_5_6_g2_telephoto.html
$2198, so about $200 more. Edited by stiuskr - 05 March 2013 at 02:21 |
||
matthiaspaul
Senior Member Joined: 08 September 2006 Country: Germany Status: Offline Posts: 940 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 05 March 2013 at 01:33 | |
Congrats, Gustav, to your new lens. Now, that the lens has been changed to a more acceptable color (personally I would have preferred black or anthrazite, but white is okay as well), I may purchase one as well somewhen. Unfortunately, they didn't change the "dust magnet" rubber rings at the same time. There are so many complaints about them, I really don't understand why Sony hasn't addressed this problem already. It would be so easy to solve. Just wondering if they never use their own products over there in Japan... Since I could not find any official statements regarding weather sealing, I think we have to conclude the lens isn't sealed. Or have you heard any official statements indicating otherwise? Regarding lens protocols, did you had a chance to test the SAL-70400G2 on a SLT-A99 with FW1.00 or earlier? The SAL-70400G2 is known to be supported by FW1.01 AF-D-wise, therefore it would be particularly interesting to learn if it was already supported by FW1.00 or earlier as well. Greetings, Matthias Edited by matthiaspaul - 05 March 2013 at 07:10 |
||
--
Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de |
||
stiuskr
Moderator Group Joined: 01 September 2006 Country: United States Location: West Virginia Status: Offline Posts: 11497 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 05 March 2013 at 02:25 | |
I think they're trying to tell me something, the expected availability date is my birthday
Sony US has it now listed with full specs and also 70mm and 400mm MTF charts. But they're saying 7/21 for availability. LINK Edited by stiuskr - 05 March 2013 at 02:38 |
||
Rob Suits Jr.
a99M2 a99 a77 a700 KM7D|Min24/2.8 Min35/2 So50/1.4 So50/2.8 Min85/1.4G Tam90/2.8 Tam180/3.5|Tam17-50 CZ24-70G2 KM28-75D So70-200G1 So70-300G So70-400G1| SonyF60 AD200R2 |
||
kefkafloyd
Senior Member Joined: 04 July 2006 Country: United States Location: Massachusetts Status: Offline Posts: 2455 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 05 March 2013 at 04:57 | |
$2199 is a very fair price for it, I think, given the AF improvements and the unfortunate fact that the prices on lenses on all marques are going up.
Nikon just announced their new 80-400 VR and that's coming in at $2699. Nikon 80-400 |
||
kankushok
Senior Member Joined: 21 August 2007 Country: United States Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 850 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 05 March 2013 at 05:35 | |
I just saw that Nikon version. Looks like Nikon's gone even crazier than Sony. I was strongly considering Nikon except for their outdated and slow 80-400mm, but with the ridiculous price of this lens, and the chatter about their terrible quality control/customer service, I'm thinking I'll stick it out with Sony a while longer.
I think the improved AF on the new 70-400mm would be nice, but I like my silver version just fine already. I've actually gotten used to the silver color, and find the new white one strangely odd. |
||
a100, a77, 16-50, 70-400, Tokina 400, Tamron 90mm, F43
|
||
ijsvogel
Senior Member Knowledgebase Contributor Joined: 14 September 2008 Country: Netherlands Location: netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 1915 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 05 March 2013 at 06:41 | |
the price that you see now is not right , it`s the sony-shop price.
i`m sure that in the shops the price shall be lower lower , |
||
my picture`s
www.gkiburg.nl A77 A99 SAL70-400 GII SAL300mm 2.8 SSM-G SAL500mm F4 SSM-G SAL70-400 SSM-G http://yourshot.nationalgeographic.com/profile/109172/ |
||
Sky_walker
Senior Member Joined: 25 April 2012 Country: Poland Location: Current: UK Status: Offline Posts: 372 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 05 March 2013 at 08:44 | |
Yea... especially when it seems like the grip on.. say: 16-50 f/2.8 is better in that respect. No idea why they didn't use the same rubber opting for the "old one" instead.
I wonder if they got anywhere close to the Sony's image quality. Edited by Sky_walker - 05 March 2013 at 08:50 |
||
Sony A77, A200, Minolta α7, Flashes, Several lenses covering 8-300mm in total. Primes shooter (though not avoiding zooms).
|
||
TallPaul
Senior Member Joined: 17 March 2006 Country: United Kingdom Status: Offline Posts: 2824 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 05 March 2013 at 11:46 | |
Hey Matthias, if you watch the camera diner video a few pages back, Paul Genge asks the Sony guy (forget his name) if its weather sealed and after a bit of a "errrrr" pause he says no. I think he uses some term like "splash/rain proof"? Its semi-official I suppose Personally I am loving the white finish (over the silver), and eventually I would like a lens in this length. I have been thinking for a long time of looking at a 1.4x or 2x TC for my 70-200 but at 1/4 the cost of the 70-400 it makes me wonder what is the better option - if the focus is fast great. I do wonder though if you need a newer body (A77/A99/Nex6 etc) with the on sensor assistance to get the marketing quoted 4x improvement in speed. |
||
|
||
Sky_walker
Senior Member Joined: 25 April 2012 Country: Poland Location: Current: UK Status: Offline Posts: 372 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 05 March 2013 at 12:27 | |
"drip proof" was the term he used I believe.
As for speed - you should ask Gustav, but besides accuracy - I believe your A900 will benefit from improved speed as any other A-mount camera. Simply because focusing motor and controller is located in the lens, so body shouldn't make any huge difference. |
||
Sony A77, A200, Minolta α7, Flashes, Several lenses covering 8-300mm in total. Primes shooter (though not avoiding zooms).
|
||
matthiaspaul
Senior Member Joined: 08 September 2006 Country: Germany Status: Offline Posts: 940 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 05 March 2013 at 13:12 | |
There's yet another thing I'd like to know about the SAL-70400G2, this time with a SLT-A99 firmware 1.01.
The automatic correction of lens errors in JPG works well with the SAL-70400G. Does it continue to work with the SAL-70400G2 as well? Greetings, Matthias |
||
--
Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de |
||
> Forum Home > Equipment forums > Lens Talk > A-mount lenses | Page <1 7891011 13> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.086 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.