24-70 comparison |
Page 123> |
Author | ||
japp
Newbie Joined: 25 March 2021 Country: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 49 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: 24-70 comparison Posted: 28 July 2023 at 14:01 |
|
Hey all,
i have been looking in to getting some nice lenses for my Sony a7. lately i have seen there are some nice 24-70 lenses but i have also seen an A mount Sony Carl-Zeiss f2.8 variant which i can't seem to find any comparisons off to the current Sony e mount Carl-Zeiss 24-70 f4 or the Sony 24-70 f2.8 GM. i am looking in to the a mount 24-70 F2.8 lens since i started out on the a mount with an a58, there after got an a68 and also some film camera's. therefore i could use this lens on much more body's. ( to your info i already have an La-ea4 adapter) what would you guys recommend and most importantly how do these lenses compare to each other? |
||
2manycamera
Senior Member Joined: 14 November 2005 Location: Cal Motherlode Status: Offline Posts: 1664 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 28 July 2023 at 16:01 | |
If you need a 24-70/2.8 that will work on both A & E mount, then the Vario-Sonnar 2.8/24-70 ZA (that's it's full name) is your best choice. It's an excellent lens in most regards, although newer FE lenses will outperform it in areas such as corner sharpness. Also, if primarily used on aps-c cameras such as the a68 what you get is a 36-105 equivalent. A possible better choice would be the SONY 2.8/16-50 SSM.
Another issue is which film bodies you would like to match this lens. Since the ZA is an SSM lens, it will AF on a limited number of Minolta bodies, such as the Dynax/Maxxum 7, 5, (maybe the 4?) and 9's with the SSM update. Again, if you want both A & E compatibility, then this is your best choice. But, newer FE lenses will outperform the older ZA in many regards (size, weight, focus speed, corner performance and probably color fringing-LOCA). Hope this helps. |
||
7D a68 a99 a6600 a7Rii 16/2.8 24/2.8 28/2 35/2 50/1.4 100/2 200/2.8 24-70CZ 1.8/135 80-200/2.8 24-105 28-135 300/4 16-50DT 70-300G Tam 90/2.8, E55-210 E2/12 Sig E1.4/16,30 & 56, FE15/4.5V
|
||
nandbytes
Senior Member Joined: 09 January 2014 Country: United Kingdom Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Posts: 3630 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 28 July 2023 at 17:33 | |
I have never owned any 24-70mm and briefly owned Tamron 28-75mm f2.8.
24-70mm f2.8 lenses are (for me) not wide enough, not long enough, not small/light enough and not fast enough. Bit of a jack of all trades kinda lens which isn't quite my personal preference unless I was shooting at events, wedding and such which I don't. Since you are willing to consider f4 options, I suggest looking at Sony 24-105mm f4 or tamron 28-200mm f2.8-5.6 or even the new Sony 20-70mm f4. The newer e-mount lenses are better than older lenses optically (sharpness, bokeh, flare etc) and in some cases smaller too. Of course you cannot use them on a-mount bodies. On A-mount there is a sigma art 24-105mm f4 which is bigger and heavier than Sony version and not as optically good especially at the longer end. There is also a Sony/minolta 24-105mm f3.4-4.5 which I used to own. I really liked it for its size but needed stopping down a little bit for better results especially in corners. There is also a minolta 28-135mm f4-4.5 which reviews favorably. |
||
AG Photography
A7RV, 20-70G, 70-200GII, Viltrox16mm/1.8, 35/1.4GM, Sammy85/1.4II, 500DN |
||
addy landzaat
Senior Member Joined: 22 April 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 15707 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 28 July 2023 at 19:08 | |
There are several threads on normal zooms on A-mount cameras. The conclusion:
Sony/Zeiss 24-70/2.8 SSM - the best of the bunch Tamron/Minolta/Sony 28-75/2.8 - the best bang for your buck Minolta 28-70/2.8 G - for lovers of great bokeh! 24-85, 24-105 and 28-105 if you want more reach and don't mind the slower aperture and slightly worse IQ. The Sigma 24-105/4 HSM seldom is mentioned, but as the reviews back then said it was comparable the Canon version, it also is a good option. If you go with a SSM, SAM or HSM lens, I would also get a LA-EA3 or LA-EA5 to taken full advantage of your AF system with newer E-mount cameras. |
||
Why not follow me on Instagram? @Addy_101
|
||
QuietOC
Senior Member Joined: 28 February 2015 Country: United States Location: Michigan Status: Offline Posts: 3716 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 28 July 2023 at 20:29 | |
The Sony ZA and SAM zooms have Lens Compensation support when used on the LA-EA adapters on full-frame E-mount cameras. I had a sharp Sony 28-75 SAM, but I didn't like how it rendered backgrounds. The Tamrons weren't as sharp, but they also looked awful.
I have an old Tokina 28-70mm F2.8 that has nicer rendering. I haven't tried the original 28-70 G or the A-mount 24-70 ZA's. The later seems to have a lot of variation judging by the two samples DXOMark tested. |
||
Sony A7RIV LA-EA5
Pentax Q7 5-15 15-45/2.8 8.5/1.9 11.5/9 |
||
addy landzaat
Senior Member Joined: 22 April 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 15707 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 28 July 2023 at 21:18 | |
I feel that native E-mount lenses in this range are better: sharper and faster AF. That is why I picked up the Sigma 28-70/2.8 DG DN |
||
Why not follow me on Instagram? @Addy_101
|
||
arrow34
Senior Member Joined: 04 April 2013 Country: United States Location: MI Status: Offline Posts: 155 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 31 July 2023 at 00:00 | |
I was in your same situation, I still have my a99mk2 and I have the Sony/Zeiss 24-70/2.8 SSM. I ended up getting the a7r 4 and discovers that the laea5 worked amazingly with the a7r4. I have stuck with it for the last year And a half. I recently got a e-mount 24-70, but will keep my a99mk2 And the ziess. Great combo.
|
||
Sony A7RIV, A99II, Sony 24-70SAL2470Z, Sony 70-200 f2.8, Minolta 17-35, 24-50 f4, 28 f2, 50 f1.4, 35-105, 28-105, 70-210, 100-200, 100-300. Samyang 35 1.4, reflex 500
|
||
nandbytes
Senior Member Joined: 09 January 2014 Country: United Kingdom Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Posts: 3630 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 31 July 2023 at 07:33 | |
But OP doesn't own an A99mk2...
He also doesn't seem to need f2.8. Given longer term upgrade path is e-mount it makes sense to buy native e-mount lenses where he can. In future he's only going to lose money if he has to sell a-mount lenses to upgrade. Personally I'd never suggest anyone to newly buy any a-mount lenses unless it's not available natively or it's a speciality lens or you want something for it's rendering etc. None of this seems to apply to OPs case above. In fact on e-mount there's like seven 24-xx options while there's three on a-mount. If you add 28-xx then there's even more e-mount than a-mount. Edited by nandbytes - 31 July 2023 at 07:37 |
||
AG Photography
A7RV, 20-70G, 70-200GII, Viltrox16mm/1.8, 35/1.4GM, Sammy85/1.4II, 500DN |
||
addy landzaat
Senior Member Joined: 22 April 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 15707 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 31 July 2023 at 09:09 | |
But OP wants to use the lens on his film cameras and you can't fit a native E-mount lens on an A-mount camera. So, buying native does not make sense.
How do you count three 24-xx options for A-mount? I count 22 of all makes, ranges and aperture. Four are f/2.8: Sony/Zeiss 24-70/2.8; Sigma 24-60/2.8; Sigma 24-70/2.8 and Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC (disregarding slight updates). |
||
Why not follow me on Instagram? @Addy_101
|
||
nandbytes
Senior Member Joined: 09 January 2014 Country: United Kingdom Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Posts: 3630 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 31 July 2023 at 09:36 | |
I don't really consider a film cameras as an "upgrade" to e-mount. As I mentioned in my comment e-mount is the only upgrade path since a-mount is no longer in production. Plus OP himself has chosen FF e-mount over FF a-mount. To me that shows that he also views e-mount as the upgrade path on some level. Tbh I consider film cameras mostly a waste of time and money (even though I own/use them myself). There aren't many shots I have seen that have benefitted from being taken on film. If people like the experience then each to their own but its not an upgrade by any means.
My bad, I was clearly wrong then. I didn't realise Sigma and tamron made those for a-mount, thought they only made them for EF/F. I only counted Zeiss 24-70/2.8, sigma 24-105/4 and Sony/minolta 24-105mm f3.5-4.5 I also forgot about Minolta 24-50m f4 & 24-85mm, even though I owned one myself I guess there's more options on a-mount definitely with a big range. Of course image quality and size differences compared to e-mount is a separate discussion. Edited by nandbytes - 31 July 2023 at 09:43 |
||
AG Photography
A7RV, 20-70G, 70-200GII, Viltrox16mm/1.8, 35/1.4GM, Sammy85/1.4II, 500DN |
||
owenn01
Alpha Eyes group Joined: 20 May 2008 Country: United Kingdom Location: Kent Status: Offline Posts: 12338 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 31 July 2023 at 10:10 | |
One more vote (if there has been one already?) for the Sigma 24-70 EX DG HSM variant; I've used it for several years now on my a99 so it woul dbe a perfect match for a film camera in a-mount. Rendering of OoF I find pleasing - perhaps not quite as creamy as the Sony Zeiss variant - but it is also a whole lot less money to buy, at least in a used form.
Best regards, Neil. |
||
My Mantra: "Comment on other's work as you would wish to have yours commented upon". Go on - it's fun!
|
||
addy landzaat
Senior Member Joined: 22 April 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 15707 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 31 July 2023 at 10:41 | |
Film is not an upgrade, it is side step. Live isn't linear. With film it is all about the experience. A lot of people would not take pictures if they had to use only digital. You can take most pictures with digital (better) but film always is better then no camera. TBH, it is your subjective opinion, not that relevant to the question of OP. |
||
Why not follow me on Instagram? @Addy_101
|
||
owenn01
Alpha Eyes group Joined: 20 May 2008 Country: United Kingdom Location: Kent Status: Offline Posts: 12338 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 31 July 2023 at 10:44 | |
My daughter-in-law only takes film images (she's also a Nikon shooter but that's by-the-by); she loves the 'experience' of film photography and the excitement of waiting to see what the effects she's tried look like when she gets the film back. It's a Modern Art Degree sort of thing I've now gathered!
Best regards, Neil. |
||
My Mantra: "Comment on other's work as you would wish to have yours commented upon". Go on - it's fun!
|
||
nandbytes
Senior Member Joined: 09 January 2014 Country: United Kingdom Location: Cambridge Status: Offline Posts: 3630 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 31 July 2023 at 10:55 | |
As I said each to their own. I am not passing judgement on their choices or questioning their choices.
Opinions are subjective which is why its an opinion and not a fact. It is relevant because OP asked forum's opinion if he should buy e-mount or a-mount. My opinion is he should buy e-mount for reasons mentioned above. Most importantly lenses are intended to be kept for a long time and e-mount provides greater longevity in my opinion. |
||
AG Photography
A7RV, 20-70G, 70-200GII, Viltrox16mm/1.8, 35/1.4GM, Sammy85/1.4II, 500DN |
||
> Forum Home > Equipment forums > Lens Talk | Page 123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.