30fps - use case? |
Page <123 |
Author | |
Miranda F ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 11 January 2014 Country: United Kingdom Location: Bristol Status: Offline Posts: 3715 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Surely high-definition video capability is going to squeeze out rapid still shooting as decent phone cameras squeezed out mass consumer cameras?
Video can already exceed the pixel count considered satisfactory by an older generation of DSLR shooters - maybe there is an actual use case for 30fps stills which cannot currently be met by video, but I can't see that staying for long. I also see the trade-off between frame rate and resolution becoming unimportant when software becomes available that allows you to pick your own point in that trade-off before or after shooting, rather in the way that some video can be interlaced. |
|
Miranda F & Sensorex, Sony A7Rii, A58, Nex-6, Dynax 4, 5, 60, 500si/600si/700si/800si, various Sony & Minolta lenses, several Tamrons, lots of MF primes and *far* too many old film cameras ...
|
|
![]() |
|
gigo ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 28 March 2008 Country: Japan Location: Yokohama Status: Offline Posts: 327 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I sold 3 bodies and 22 lenses to buy the ILCE-1. There was a huge space in my auto-drys, and I still had a lot of money to buy ILCE-1.
There is one thing to do. I was looking at the list of lenses. Then I noticed something. Year fps lens 2013 15 35F28Z 2013 15 55F18Z 2013 15 2870 2014 15 1635Z 2014 15 2470Z 2014 15 P28135G 2014 15 70200G 2015 15 28F20 2015 15 35F14Z 2015 15 90M28G 2015 15 24240 2016 15 70300G 2016 20 50F14Z 2016 20 50F18F 2016 20 50M28 2016 20 85F14GM 2016 30 2470GM 2017 30 85F18 2017 30 100F28GM 2017 30 1224G 2017 30 1635GM 2017 30 24105G 2017 30 70200GM 2017 30 100400GM 2018 30 24F14GM 2018 30 400F28GM 2019 30 35F18F 2019 30 135F18GM 2019 30 600F40GM 2019 30 200600G 2020 30 20F18G 2020 30 1224GM 2021 30 35F14GM 2021 30 2860 There is a clear relationship between the release year and fps. It seems that all the lenses released in the future can be expected to be 30 fps. And 30fps to the kit lens, can we expect that all the bodies will be 30fps someday? Edited by gigo - 17 February 2021 at 07:39 |
|
(Now)7RIV,9,6300.., FE:13, E:4, A:8 lenses -> (Plan)1,7RIV.., FE:12, E:2, A:5
|
|
![]() |
|
QuietOC ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 28 February 2015 Country: United States Location: Michigan Status: Offline Posts: 3157 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yep. just updates to E-mount to support the A9 in 2017. Sony made a similar change to A-mount in 2011 to support 12 FPS of the A77. The A-mount lenses since then support 10 FPS on LA-EA3/5. The older SAM/SSM lenses support 8 FPS. The one exception is the DT 18-55 SAM II. Third-party stuff on both platforms don't have these updates. My Tamron SP 85mm F1.8 USD is one of the last A-mount AF lenses, but it uses pre-A77 tech. E-mount bodies can shoot video at 120 (maybe 240) FPS. 30 FPS is just the current stills limit. |
|
Sony A7III A7RII NEX-5T HVL-F45RM LA-EA3 LA-EA4r MB-IV MC-11 EF-E II TLT ROKR MD-NEX KR-NEX DA-NEX
Minolta Maxxum 600si Pentax Q7 5-15 15-45/2.8 8.5/1.9 11.5/9 AF-P/Q |
|
![]() |
|
QuietOC ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 28 February 2015 Country: United States Location: Michigan Status: Offline Posts: 3157 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Entropy512 who is a user here and on other forums has analyzed some of the E-mount stuff:
|
|
Sony A7III A7RII NEX-5T HVL-F45RM LA-EA3 LA-EA4r MB-IV MC-11 EF-E II TLT ROKR MD-NEX KR-NEX DA-NEX
Minolta Maxxum 600si Pentax Q7 5-15 15-45/2.8 8.5/1.9 11.5/9 AF-P/Q |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Page <123 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.