A-Mount Teleconverters Guide |
Page <1 23456 31> |
Author | |
eccl ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 07 December 2005 Country: Canada Location: Canada Status: Offline Posts: 757 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If it is not labelled with MC7 or 7E than it is only 4 elements. Also TC with 7 elements in most cases is thicker than TC with 4 elements.
Hope this help. eccl |
|
![]() |
|
X-R-M ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 24 August 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 667 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There is comparison Tamron AF 1.4x TC and Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 here
Test was done with Tamron 100-400 lens in Canon mount. There are also sample pictures of: Sigma 10-20/4-5.6 EX DC HSM vs. Canon 10-22/3.5-4.5 USM Sigma 24-70/2.8 EX DG Macro vs. Canon 24-70/2.8 L USM Sigma 30/1.4 EX DC HSM |
|
![]() |
|
Rambler358 ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 23 December 2005 Country: United States Location: Torrance, CA Status: Offline Posts: 221 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Some really great info here! I've just recently acquired a rare Tokina AT-X 340 AF II 100-300mm f/4 lens and was looking for a good 2x TC. From what's stated above, and since this is a constant f/4 lens I should be able to use a 2x TC. However, Tokina's website states the following for their Kenko PRO 300 2.0x TC: "Full AF operation with PRO 300 2.0x is possible when using camera lenses with maximum aperture of F2.8 or brighter." So now I'm a little confused - can anyone shed some light if I'll in fact be able to use a 2x TC and still have AF? Or will I need to drop down to a 1.4x TC in order to retain AF? Many thanks in advance! |
|
~Ron
Torrance, CA |
|
![]() |
|
eccl ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 07 December 2005 Country: Canada Location: Canada Status: Offline Posts: 757 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Pro 300 2X will AF with your 100-300/4 lens since it will AF with a 70-210/4 lens. Since the effective aperture is F8, AF will only work in good light and subject with high contrast. Hope this help. eccl |
|
![]() |
|
Jac. ![]() Newbie ![]() Joined: 15 March 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 17 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Great work, EECL, nice thread.
Maybe one addition that I think nobody else mentioned yet: The Minolta APO converters also work with the 200mm f4 APO macro lens. Rgds. Jac |
|
![]() |
|
eccl ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 07 December 2005 Country: Canada Location: Canada Status: Offline Posts: 757 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I believe 200/4 was mentioned in the TC guide:
"Minolta APO teleconverters are designed specifically for certain Minolta lenses only, all of the Minolta AF Telephoto G lenses such as 135/2.8 STF, 200/2.8, 300/2.8, 300/2.8 SSM, 300/4, 400/4.5, 600/4, 200/4, 70-200/2.8 SSM. " Regards, eccl |
|
![]() |
|
H_K_F ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 12 August 2005 Country: Hong Kong Status: Offline Posts: 1171 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
After using a Minolta APO 2X converter on a 300mm 2.8, there are noticable loss of sharpness with a bit of shake, and reduction of contrast.
Since I have not use such combo before, I recognize my techniques is not good enough. Any recommendation / reading for this newbie in "teleland"? |
|
Dynax 7,9,A2,5D
Sony A700,A900,A99 17-35G, 24-70Z, 28-70G, 70-200G, 35G, 50D, 85G, 100D, 300/2.8G, 600G NEX5,5R,A7Rii 10-18, 16, 18-200, 24-70Z, 35/2.8Z, 55/1.8Z, 85/1.8Z, 70-200/4 |
|
![]() |
|
eccl ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 07 December 2005 Country: Canada Location: Canada Status: Offline Posts: 757 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Are you using a tripod or at least monopod with your 300/2.8 + APO 2X combination? Handheld is alrady difficult for 300/2.8, add a 2X it will be even tougher. You'll need a HEAVY DUTY tripod with a good ball head or heavy duty head. Mount the lens onto the tripod instead of the camera as you don't want the camera (mount) to support the weight of the heavy lens.
Picture quality will be degraded with a 2X TC but the result should not be too bad (at least 70-75% of original). Hope this help. eccl Edited by eccl - 18 March 2006 at 23:50 |
|
![]() |
|
H_K_F ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 12 August 2005 Country: Hong Kong Status: Offline Posts: 1171 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
With AS, I found using 1.4X with 300/2.8 handheld managable; 2X handheld still workable, result is a bit marginal. The following was handheld shot with enough light.
![]() I mounted the lens combo on a Gitzo G1228 MKII and a Acratech Ultimate Ballhead. I did not tighten/secure the ballhead with AS on, since the subject floated on water and moved slightly. ![]() 100% crop ![]() Another 100% crop ![]() The result is not bad, at least 80% of original or with 1.4X. Just wondering if the result is normal and if any better gear (Gimble head), or technique should be involved from your experience? |
|
Dynax 7,9,A2,5D
Sony A700,A900,A99 17-35G, 24-70Z, 28-70G, 70-200G, 35G, 50D, 85G, 100D, 300/2.8G, 600G NEX5,5R,A7Rii 10-18, 16, 18-200, 24-70Z, 35/2.8Z, 55/1.8Z, 85/1.8Z, 70-200/4 |
|
![]() |
|
spiritx ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 24 October 2005 Location: France Status: Offline Posts: 41 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi all,
i would know your opinion on the use of a kenko Teleplus 300 1,4x with a sigma 135-400 4,5/5,6 ? I think i'll lost AF (maybe can i keep it by hidding 3 pins ?) but what about the image quality ? What is your opinion on this ? Thanks, Anthony |
|
![]() |
|
eccl ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 07 December 2005 Country: Canada Location: Canada Status: Offline Posts: 757 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
AF will work (at least try to lock focus on an object) since Kenko PRO 300 1.4X is simply passing through the signal. Your EXIF data will not be correct.
Quality wise you'll get about 80-90% of your original image but bear in mind your 135-400 is pretty big so adding a 1.4X will make it even longer and heavier. You'll probably need a monopod or tripod or high ISO for best result. Hope this help. eccl |
|
![]() |
|
ballfresno ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 02 January 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Posts: 102 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
eccl, thanks very much for a very informative posting (especially for those of us new to the Minolta world).
One small question for you or anybody else that can help me: on the Minolta Yahoo! group, I found out about the Canon FD lens adaptor which would be perfect for me and you've alluded to it as well. However, the only link I've been given for actually acquiring such an adapter has been to BHPhoto in the US. I was wondering if anybody knows where in the UK one might get such an adaptor as the shipping charge from the US is as much as the adaptor itself. cheers, eric PS - Link to BHPhoto product page |
|
![]() |
|
eccl ![]() Admin Group ![]() Joined: 07 December 2005 Country: Canada Location: Canada Status: Offline Posts: 757 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can't help you here as I do not know of any photo dealer/retailer in UK that carries this FD->Min AF adapter. You can also try your luck on ebay but price can be higher than B&H + shipping to UK.
eccl |
|
![]() |
|
ballfresno ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 02 January 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Posts: 102 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks eccl. My findings so far have been that there does not seem to be anybody in the UK that deals with such. BHPhoto it will have to be. I guess the shipping costs are not that bad...
eric |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Page <1 23456 31> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.