FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Composition

Page  <12
Author
Harm vb View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 19 May 2019
Country: Netherlands
Location: Gorinchem
Status: Offline
Posts: 529
Post Options Post Options   Quote Harm vb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 November 2021 at 18:02
Originally posted by 4paul 4paul wrote:

hee hee! - different rules for different organizations, no confusion there!

The Rule of Thirds is an approximation of an approximation - the Rule is supposed to be the Golden Mean, but for simplicity we call it Thirds. The lines for Golden Mean are approximately 62.5% of the horizontal/vertical width/height, not 66.7% of Thirds.


Actually something like 1 to [1 + Sqrt (5)]/2 = 1: 1,618033989
Harm, with A7iii+A7Rii plus 6-400mm glass.
My Flickr
 



Back to Top
addy landzaat View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 22 April 2006
Country: Netherlands
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Posts: 12167
Post Options Post Options   Quote addy landzaat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 November 2021 at 19:02
Originally posted by owenn01 owenn01 wrote:

Paul - you'll never make it with images lie that ( ). Why:
- The woman - the focal point - is too high in the frame
- She is way off 'The Third'
- She is looking out of the image - it takes the viewer out of the frame with her
- Too much foliage. Way too much.
- Highlights in said foliage need toning down
- Have you thought about adding a vignette to the image? That would bring the focus back into the centre of the frame
- There's nothing in the centre of the frame for the eye to lock onto
- Looks overexposed to ne - bring it down half or a full stop perhaps?
- That leaf - upper RHS - is very bright; you could clone that out to bring some interest into the upper RHS
- Did you consider moving to the left so more could be made of the stairs as a lead-in? A lead-in to the image would have worked well here.
- I can't see a catch light in the eyes......
- It's not a great hairstyle - she should have arranged her hair in such a way it doesn't fall over her one eye.

I'm hoping this doesn't jeopardize my position as an AE on here....

Thanks for sharing the image and your continued view on this shot!

Take care and best regards, Neil.
You missed the fact he did not focus on her eye. Portrait 101.








Without kidding, I like the picture very much. The picture has different areas with their own focus. The woman top left, the OOF leaves on the right, architecture on top, the arch on the bottom left. It works well, proofing that you can have "the eye" without knowing what you do. The only thing I would like different is the horizon, it is slightly off. TFS.

Edited by addy landzaat - 16 November 2021 at 19:40
Why not follow me on Instagram? @Addy_101
Back to Top
Roger Rex View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 30 September 2005
Country: United States
Location: North Florida
Status: Offline
Posts: 7705
Post Options Post Options   Quote Roger Rex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2021 at 01:09
“The so-called rules of photographic composition are, in my opinion, invalid, irrelevant, immaterial.” Ansel Adams

“I didn’t write the rules. Why would I follow them?”   W. Eugene Smith

“What photographic rules should you follow? None, unless you want to create average images.” Cole Thompson

“Cole’s Rule of Thirds: A great image is comprised of 1/3 vision, 1/3 the shot and 1/3 processing. But everything begins with Vision, which drives the shot and the processing.” Cole Thompson


Hatred corrodes the container it is carried in. http://rogerrex.zenfolio.com/
Back to Top
Dyxum main page >  Forum Home > Dyxum Community > Open Talk Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.

Monitor calibration strip

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer

In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania

Feel free to contact us if needed.