Dyxum website
Filter posts
Importing DM-9 / DS-100 data into scans |
Page <1234 8> |
| Author | |
polyglot 
Senior Member 
Joined: 25 June 2007 Country: Australia Location: Australia Status: Offline Posts: 3622 |
 Post Options
 Quote  Reply
 Posted: 13 March 2008 at 11:25 |
|
OK, updated version that allows you to specify the pattern that it uses to search for jpeg files. So say you had roll 0003 containing frames 1 to 24, to make frame 16 match scan000316.jpg you would do this:
./dm9toexif.pl scan@R@F DNO-0003.txt and it will fill that pattern in by substituting roll-number for @R and frame number for @F and then use it to look for a jpeg file in the same directory of that name. dm9toexif.pl |
|
 |
|
|
hotwire
Senior Member
Joined: 28 August 2006 Country: Canada Location: Toronto Status: Offline Posts: 1053 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 March 2008 at 17:49 |
|
Finally got good look at the file.
"Bad Shutter Value ' 0"5'" I've looked at creating custom tags, but am really lost. |
|
|
a99ii; Maxxum 9
CZ: 16-35, 24-70/2.8, 135/1.8; Minolta: 50/1.4; MC58/1.2; 85/1.4GD 300/2.8; 500/8; 600/4; Tam: 90/2.8M; Sig: 12-24/4.5-5.6; 15/2.8; Sony: 35/1.4G; 135STF, 70-200/2.8G |
|
|
|
|
polyglot
Senior Member
Joined: 25 June 2007 Country: Australia Location: Australia Status: Offline Posts: 3622 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 March 2008 at 11:06 |
|
Can you send me the offending DNO-file?
|
|
|
|
|
hotwire
Senior Member
Joined: 28 August 2006 Country: Canada Location: Toronto Status: Offline Posts: 1053 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 March 2008 at 19:02 |
|
I believe it was the one I already sent you.
DNO-0001.txt I will resent it by email later today. Could it be because of the leading space? |
|
|
a99ii; Maxxum 9
CZ: 16-35, 24-70/2.8, 135/1.8; Minolta: 50/1.4; MC58/1.2; 85/1.4GD 300/2.8; 500/8; 600/4; Tam: 90/2.8M; Sig: 12-24/4.5-5.6; 15/2.8; Sony: 35/1.4G; 135STF, 70-200/2.8G |
|
|
|
|
hotwire
Senior Member
Joined: 28 August 2006 Country: Canada Location: Toronto Status: Offline Posts: 1053 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 March 2008 at 03:24 |
|
In your latest version, which tags are still outstanding?
Can you add tags to your program for Make="Minolta", Model="Maxxum 9", and FileSource="Film Scanner" What other tags are we currently missing that need a custom tag created? |
|
|
a99ii; Maxxum 9
CZ: 16-35, 24-70/2.8, 135/1.8; Minolta: 50/1.4; MC58/1.2; 85/1.4GD 300/2.8; 500/8; 600/4; Tam: 90/2.8M; Sig: 12-24/4.5-5.6; 15/2.8; Sony: 35/1.4G; 135STF, 70-200/2.8G |
|
|
|
|
polyglot
Senior Member
Joined: 25 June 2007 Country: Australia Location: Australia Status: Offline Posts: 3622 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 March 2008 at 12:24 |
|
OK, I've fixed it with respect to x"y forms of shutter time and added the FileSource, Make and Model tags.
There are many tags currently not being set, or being set poorly, e.g. Flash settings: EXIF defines a very restricted set of options and the DM-9 values basically condense to "on" and "off" when translated to EXIF because there's no concept of rear curtain sync or the like documented in exiftool. |
|
|
|
|
hotwire
Senior Member
Joined: 28 August 2006 Country: Canada Location: Toronto Status: Offline Posts: 1053 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 March 2008 at 18:14 |
|
Where exif lacks, I propose we utilize user defined tags with the same functionality as the makernotes tags used by the digital bodies a la http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/Minolta.html
I just need a list of exactly which tags we need/want to ask for Phil's help in creating those custom tags. Can we also add as an input from the user when calling the program the type of film used (Reala, Gold, etc), and then insert that as a custom tag as well? |
|
|
a99ii; Maxxum 9
CZ: 16-35, 24-70/2.8, 135/1.8; Minolta: 50/1.4; MC58/1.2; 85/1.4GD 300/2.8; 500/8; 600/4; Tam: 90/2.8M; Sig: 12-24/4.5-5.6; 15/2.8; Sony: 35/1.4G; 135STF, 70-200/2.8G |
|
|
|
|
hotwire
Senior Member
Joined: 28 August 2006 Country: Canada Location: Toronto Status: Offline Posts: 1053 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 April 2008 at 22:02 |
|
I've discovered a minor bug at present. If you use @f instead of @F the program does not like it.
|
|
|
a99ii; Maxxum 9
CZ: 16-35, 24-70/2.8, 135/1.8; Minolta: 50/1.4; MC58/1.2; 85/1.4GD 300/2.8; 500/8; 600/4; Tam: 90/2.8M; Sig: 12-24/4.5-5.6; 15/2.8; Sony: 35/1.4G; 135STF, 70-200/2.8G |
|
|
|
|
polyglot
Senior Member
Joined: 25 June 2007 Country: Australia Location: Australia Status: Offline Posts: 3622 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 April 2008 at 12:04 |
|
Yep. Must be @F. Likewise uppercase for the other one as well, though I can't say I reckon that's a bug - options are generally case-sensitive for most programs but for this it needn't be.
Haven't had time to look at it recently at all - too much work and all spare time has been photography :) |
|
|
|
|
hotwire
Senior Member
Joined: 28 August 2006 Country: Canada Location: Toronto Status: Offline Posts: 1053 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 January 2010 at 06:37 |
|
Take this as a good sign for software engineering: found a bug with dm9toexif, and took 20 months since the last one!
For now, ensure any image files have a lowercase filename suffix .jpg, not .JPG. By the way, are any other dyxumites using this program? (I guess it would only apply to those using a 9 with the DM-9). |
|
|
a99ii; Maxxum 9
CZ: 16-35, 24-70/2.8, 135/1.8; Minolta: 50/1.4; MC58/1.2; 85/1.4GD 300/2.8; 500/8; 600/4; Tam: 90/2.8M; Sig: 12-24/4.5-5.6; 15/2.8; Sony: 35/1.4G; 135STF, 70-200/2.8G |
|
|
|
|
AudioDoc
Senior Member
Joined: 26 January 2006 Country: United States Location: SLC Utah Status: Offline Posts: 2934 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 January 2010 at 20:31 |
|
Not yet, but I intend to give it a try or at least the one Vitor passed on to me -- assume its the same? This is 9 specific? Not for the 7?
|
|
|
|
|
rovhazman
Moderator Group 
Knowledge Base Coordinator Joined: 11 January 2008 Country: Israel Location: Be'er Ora Status: Offline Posts: 9061 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 29 January 2010 at 20:45 |
|
I wrote my own code in Matlab. I only tried it with DS-100. I just got DM-9 for one of my Maxxum 9, but I am still using the first roll with it.
What I worte is not the most elegant code, but it works. The only problem I have is that it doesn't agree to change the Make to Minolta. I am using Nikon scanner and it gives me error message for the -Make="Minolta". As a results my photos are tagged as Nikon Maxxum 9... Maybe I should try your codes... |
|
|
|
|
polyglot
Senior Member
Joined: 25 June 2007 Country: Australia Location: Australia Status: Offline Posts: 3622 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 January 2010 at 03:41 |
|
OK, jpg/JPG issue should be fixed in the current version. Don't forget to rename the download to .pl of course.
Oops 
|
|
|
|
|
vitor
Senior Member
Joined: 10 August 2006 Country: Portugal Location: Lisbon Status: Offline Posts: 1965 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 31 January 2010 at 13:28 |
|
I'm using polyglot script with some minor modifications.
|
|
|
|
Topic Options
 > Forum Home > Equipment forums > Camera Talk > Film cameras
|
Page <1234 8> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.
Dyxum recommendations
(not commercial banners)
AF lens repair guides
(not commercial banners)
AF lens repair guides