I've done it...

Well, congratulations then...

Hi Pieter,

Yes, I was in a bit of a problem with the FX30 being APS-C. The 24-105 is my favourite walkabout lens, but its focal length (and size) isn't optimal for the FX30. And while the Loxias are great video lenses, they have no AF ability. The 18-105 looked like it hit what I needed. Good to hear about your positive experiences.

@Harm_vb

It was the second lens I'd bid on, the first went above my reserve price. But this came in under my reserve price so I was happy.


@addy_landzaat

Ah, well it was 20 months. I don't think I'll need anything more. The Loxias are fine as video lenses and cover a good range. The Tamron 150-500 works even better as a wildlife telephoto video lens. The 18-105 gives me a good range for a walkabout video lens, plus AF functionality.

The FX30 has a nice feature with a power zoom lever on the body. That lever can also work the power zoom function of the lens, so you don't have to touch the lens. I think it makes a lot of sense as a video-centric lens.

Thanks Addy.
If the FX30 had been FF I wouldn't have had the gap I think. There weren't any lenses I really needed for my stills photography, hence the 20 months.

OTOH, an FX30 with a used 18-105 is still a lot cheaper than say an FX3 or a7Siii, so it was the better choice.

Ah well, if one turns up at a good price used, I could be tempted with a 10-20/4 G. In the mean time, I'm hoping the 18-105 will suffice.