Minolta AF 135mm F2.8 Prime Comparison to Zooms |
Author | |
QuietOC
Senior Member Joined: 28 February 2015 Country: United States Location: Michigan Status: Offline Posts: 3716 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Minolta AF 135mm F2.8 Prime Comparison to Zooms Posted: 10 September 2016 at 20:27 |
This is my second and sharper copy of the Minolta AF 135mm F2.8.
Minolta AF 28-135mm F4-4.5 Sigma AF 35-135mm F3.5-4.5 Minolta AF 35-200mm F4.5-5.6 Xi Minolta AF 70-210mm F4 Minolta AF 75-300mm F4.5-5.6 Minolta AF 100-200mm F4.5 Minolta AF 100-300mm F4.5-5.6 APO Minolta AF 100-400mm F4.5-6.7 APO Sony DT 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 SAM Sony DT 55-200mm F4-5.6 SAM Sony DT 55-300mm F4.5-5.6 SAM All of these were shot from the same distance to the chart with the focal length adjusted to give close to the same field of view. The exceptions are the two internal focus zooms which were shot at the end of the zoom range which resulted in a wider view than the 135 mm prime. The full captures below show the differences with the area outside the 3:2 crop marks. Minolta AF 28-135mm F4-4.5 @ 135mm Just a bit wider than the 135mm prime Sony DT 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 SAM Wider than the Minolta AF 28-135mm F4-4.5 Wide-Open Center Wide-Open Top Left Wide-Open Bottom Right f/5.6 Center f/5.6 Top Left f/5.6 Bottom Right f/8 Center f/8 Top Left f/8 Bottom Right Edited by QuietOC - 10 September 2016 at 21:32 |
|
Sony A7RIV LA-EA5
Pentax Q7 5-15 15-45/2.8 8.5/1.9 11.5/9 |
|
sploosher
Senior Member Joined: 14 February 2007 Location: England Status: Offline Posts: 937 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 10 September 2016 at 22:53 |
I too have this lens, got a mint copy for a bargain price of GBP149
Super sharp even wide open......... |
|
A77ii,A700,A550,,3600HSD,Nissin Di866,Minolta 50mm 2.8 Macro,135,500,18-200,Sony50mm f1.4,Sony 70-300 G SSM, Sigma10-20,28-300,Tamron17-50mm f2.8,
90mm |
|
loserdave
Newbie Joined: 05 March 2012 Country: United States Status: Offline Posts: 6 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 21 September 2016 at 08:39 |
Great Job! Super useful post.
|
|
Matt
Senior Member Joined: 30 November 2005 Country: Netherlands Location: Limburg Status: Offline Posts: 742 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 03 October 2016 at 13:09 |
Bought the "pocket rocket" not so long ago for €180. Apart from the CA at f/2.8, there is nothing to complain about.
Looking at your test result (great work BTW!), I am impressed how well the DT 55-300mm performs. |
|
QuietOC
Senior Member Joined: 28 February 2015 Country: United States Location: Michigan Status: Offline Posts: 3716 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 03 October 2016 at 14:36 |
Yes, my DT 55-300mm F4.5-5.6 is a very nice lens, and it is certainly my most used lens by number of pictures.
I am going to use the 135/2.8 for Octoberfest this month. I've also tried it a bit with a Kenko MC7 2X teleconverter, and it seems to work well at 270 mm F5.6. I'll probably add some teleconverter tests to this thread. |
|
Sony A7RIV LA-EA5
Pentax Q7 5-15 15-45/2.8 8.5/1.9 11.5/9 |
|
> Forum Home > Equipment forums > Lens Talk > A-mount lenses |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.047 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.