Neewer 28mm F2.8 MF APS-C Pancake Review |
Author | |
QuietOC
Senior Member Joined: 28 February 2015 Country: United States Location: Michigan Status: Offline Posts: 3696 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: Neewer 28mm F2.8 MF APS-C Pancake Review Posted: 12 January 2017 at 13:28 |
Neewer 28mm F2.8 Pancake
a.k.a. Kaxinda/Meike I purchased this from the same US-based eBay seller that I bought the Neewer 50mm lens from for a bit less than $65 shipped. 6 elements in 5 groups 9 aperture blades MFD 250 mm 102g 49mm filter thread clickless aperture Compared with Sony E 16mm F2.8 Pancake Sony E 20mm F2.8 Pancake Sony E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Minolta AF 24mm F2.8 Discover 25mm F1.8 Minolta/Sony AF 28mm F2.8 Sony DT 30mm F2.8 Macro Sony DT 16-50mm F2.8 SSM This is an all-metal all-manual lens with tiny lens elements. It is approximately the same size as the Sony E 16mm F2.8 pancake. The filter threads stick out a bit farther than the recessed ones on Sony pancakes, but the supplied slip-on metal lens caps sits more flush than the Sony center-pinch caps. It feels and is significantly heavier than the Sony pancakes despite lacking any motors. It is not that much smaller or lighter than the Discover 25mm F1.8--most of the difference is accounted for by the deeply recessed front element on that lens. The focus grip is a bit wider than the one on the Sony 20mm pancake, and fairly heavily damped. The focus and aperture rings have similar amounts of resistance unlike the 35/1.7 and 50/2 lenses where the focus rings turn easier. The aperture ring operates in the opposite direction to the other Kaxinda lens which turn the same as direction as Minolta SR lenses. The focus ring turns in the normal Minolta/Sony direction. The focus scale is only printed in meters. The aperture markings seem to be accurate and even pessimistic. There are no label for f/11. and Wide-open it actually lets in a bit more light than the Minolta/Sony 28mm F2.8 and the DT 16-50mm F2.8 zoom at 28 mm. It only lets in 3/8ths of the light the Discover 25mm F1.8 does wide-open. It is sharper wide-open in the center than the old 28mm F2.8 AF primes or the 16mm F2.8 pancake. Even mid-frame it is a bit sharper than the 16mm pancake. The corners however are softer and darker than the other lenses, and stopping down the lens does little to improve the corner sharpness. It has about twice the barrel distortion of the old 28mm primes--a bit more the the E 16-50mm OSS kit lens at the same focal length. The Sony wide converters seem to function well held to the front of this lens. It shares the 49mm filter thread size with those lenses. Of course it doesn't have the bayonet lugs to hold those accessory lenses or the Sony hoods in place. The Sony 49mm center-pinch lens caps do fit well. This is wide-open showing the shading and distortion at F2.8 F2.8 Center F2.8 Mid Top Left F2.8 Ext Top Left F2.8 Bottom Right Edited by QuietOC - 27 January 2017 at 23:05 |
|
Sony A7RIV LA-EA5
Pentax Q7 5-15 15-45/2.8 8.5/1.9 11.5/9 |
|
QuietOC
Senior Member Joined: 28 February 2015 Country: United States Location: Michigan Status: Offline Posts: 3696 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 23 January 2017 at 03:37 |
It was another gray day, but I took a few pictures with this little lens. I didn't write down the aperture settings. The last one may have been wide-open.
Sample images 1/100 s Abandoned stairs 1/60 s Old schoolhouse 1/1600 s |
|
Sony A7RIV LA-EA5
Pentax Q7 5-15 15-45/2.8 8.5/1.9 11.5/9 |
|
addy landzaat
Senior Member Joined: 22 April 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Online Posts: 15565 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 23 January 2017 at 07:57 |
I noticed this is a native lens according to Neewer. Maybe submit the lens for inclusion in the lensdatabase.
The pictures you showed don't impress me much. Could be the lighting. |
|
Why not follow me on Instagram? @Addy_101
|
|
QuietOC
Senior Member Joined: 28 February 2015 Country: United States Location: Michigan Status: Offline Posts: 3696 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 23 January 2017 at 11:43 |
Yes, it is a native E-mount. I believe I already submitted it along with other of these MF native lenses, but none have been added to the database so far.
None of these are very impressive as lenses, but they are fairly inexpensive. Most of them are sharp in the center wide-open, but have rather curved focus planes or other problems in the corners. The Discover 25mm F1.8 is the best one I've tried so far. Edited by QuietOC - 23 January 2017 at 11:49 |
|
Sony A7RIV LA-EA5
Pentax Q7 5-15 15-45/2.8 8.5/1.9 11.5/9 |
|
artuk
Senior Member Joined: 06 July 2007 Country: United Kingdom Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Posts: 3751 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 23 January 2017 at 12:34 |
I notice you made a comment about distortion of the 16-50mm PZ. I assume that is from raw with software that does not support Sony's correction profiles embedded in the raw file?
In camera jpegs should be corrected automatically and for lenses that require heavy correction the latest firmware does not allow the option to be turned off. If you are seeing distortion in camera jpegs, maybe check your camera settings? Thanks for the write up. How does it compare to the Sony 20mm for E mount? |
|
Art
|
|
QuietOC
Senior Member Joined: 28 February 2015 Country: United States Location: Michigan Status: Offline Posts: 3696 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 23 January 2017 at 13:01 |
I disable all the corrections I can for lens reviews and only review raw files. Capture One 10 has its own profiles for lenses which are applied automatically, but it can also use the embedded profiles, and it allows you to use no profile. I was surprised to discover that Sony applies some shading correction to E-mount raw data, but I see that others have documented that behavior. The live-view on the A5000 also seems to be corrected for distortion and maybe shading even with those disabled. A-mount cameras only apply those to shot results preview. I was really disappointed in the 20mm F2.8, but the image quality is better than this 28mm F2.8, but the image quality is certainly not 5 times better. Edited by QuietOC - 23 January 2017 at 13:09 |
|
Sony A7RIV LA-EA5
Pentax Q7 5-15 15-45/2.8 8.5/1.9 11.5/9 |
|
> Forum Home > Equipment forums > Lens Talk > E-mount lenses |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.