Poll request: compact flash failures |
Page <1 34567> |
Author | ||
stiuskr
Moderator Group Joined: 01 September 2006 Country: United States Location: West Virginia Status: Offline Posts: 11497 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 June 2011 at 12:26 | |
Well that's debateable and kinda like the question 'should I use a lens filter?' and is discussed in this very thread. Start over on page 1 for more info and POV's. |
||
Rob Suits Jr.
a99M2 a99 a77 a700 KM7D|Min24/2.8 Min35/2 So50/1.4 So50/2.8 Min85/1.4G Tam90/2.8 Tam180/3.5|Tam17-50 CZ24-70G2 KM28-75D So70-200G1 So70-300G So70-400G1| SonyF60 AD200R2 |
||
blinztree
Senior Member Joined: 06 June 2011 Country: Malaysia Status: Offline Posts: 1317 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 21 June 2011 at 06:47 | |
I see your point. I posted the question because if formatting the card makes a difference, I will adopt the habit but since that practice is debatable... I see no reason to change my current habit at the moment. Thanks for clearing up the fog. |
||
¿Location? Beats me... I'm lost on a far.far.away.tropical island.
Eldred ZeTerrible@Borneo, Land of the Head Hunters |
||
Jocelynne
Senior Member Joined: 17 June 2009 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 2819 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 21 June 2011 at 07:34 | |
I have never experienced any memory card failure. I have SanDisk CF cards in 8GB and 16GB sizes. I have Sony brand Memory Sticks in 4G, 8GB and 16GB sizes. I purchase no other brands of memory cards.
My memory problems have all been with my A700. Both types of memory card sockets failed. The CF socket failed within less than a year of purchase. The memory stick socket failed within about two years of purchase. This latter failure required replacement of 700's main board because the memory stick socket is directly soldered onto the main board. This latter repair cost me approximately half the new A700 purchase price. Out of curiosity, I asked the repair service what happens to main boards when they fail. I was told that they are repaired and recycled. But I was required to purchase a NEW main board because the memory stick socket developed a mechanical, not an electronic, failure! That is what I was informed. I am not absolutely certain that I was not sold a recycled main board. I transfer picture data into computers via card readers and via direct cable connections between the cameras and the computers. Both methods appear to perform well. I normally erase picture files by reformatting the memory cards in the cameras. I NEVER erase picture files or format memory cards in the computers. I purchase only new memory cards from well known dealers. Edited by Jocelynne - 21 June 2011 at 08:00 |
||
Maxxum 450si, Sony A300, A700, A900 and a cubic meter of Alpha lenses
|
||
kerplunk
Groupie Joined: 11 August 2011 Country: United States Location: Seattle Status: Offline Posts: 69 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 16 November 2011 at 06:33 | |
The only memory card I've had fail was in a phone, and it came that way.
I generally take the card out and put it in the computer these days, download all the pictures, delete them, reformat the card in the camera. I've adopted these steps cause I'm lazy, I've left the camera running plugged into the computer too often and found dead batteries, found myself with multiple duplicated photos cause I downloaded them multiple time (not deleted from the card) and generally forget to reformat the card when I put it back in the camera. Most of my cards are sandisk. And I suppose that putting it in the computer and formatting with block checking on occasion might be a good idea, to see it there are any errors, but I'm sure I would be way too absent minded to remember to do that. And I find the claims that reformatting in the camera will increase performance pretty easy to believe, having worked in system administration type jobs for 20 years. |
||
Bob Maddison
Senior Member Joined: 28 April 2011 Country: United Kingdom Location: Dorset Status: Offline Posts: 1102 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 16 November 2011 at 09:32 | |
The CF card has vulnerable pins. Careless insertion or an inappropriate card slot can lead to a bent pin(s). The camera slot is deep and has long guide 'rails' however, the compact card readers often have very shallow slots with inadequate guidance hence extreme care must be used when inserting a card. The slightly larger readers are better. I have had one bent pin which I straightened with pliers then inserted it into a deep slot in a reader to complete the straightening. No more problems!
It is worth remembering that a card "reader" is no more than an interface between card and computer. It doesn't 'read' data: it allows the computer to do so! If data is corrupted, then don't blame the reader - blame the computer! I had one complete CF Card failure which was accounted for because I had tried to use that card for MS's Ready Boost. This overwrote must of the card's memory and would not allow it to be used again in the camera. I recovered it by using the computer to fill the card with copies of photo files to overwtite the 'ready boost' area. When it was reformatted it worked correctly, but failed completely some time later. It may be worth while to identify each card you use and to keep a record of exactly what it was used for. The idea of using one card - one device is sound. |
||
Jocelynne
Senior Member Joined: 17 June 2009 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 2819 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 16 November 2011 at 13:56 | |
God commentary, Bob. Thanks for the observations.
|
||
Maxxum 450si, Sony A300, A700, A900 and a cubic meter of Alpha lenses
|
||
keith_h
Senior Member Joined: 22 May 2006 Country: Australia Location: Australia Status: Offline Posts: 3139 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 15 February 2012 at 13:04 | |
I use only Sandisk, download images using a media adapter/reader in my computer and reformat the cards in the camera after each download.
No problems after many years of service. |
||
sybersitizen
Senior Member Joined: 04 August 2006 Country: United States Location: California Status: Offline Posts: 14457 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 15 February 2012 at 15:34 | |
I'm not sure any debate is warranted, at least with recent Sony cameras. My reasoning is: 1. If you have only a few files to delete but want to keep other files on the card for the time being, then delete only the few files. For still files, this can be done either in-camera or with a computer. However, with movie files, you had better do this in-camera. Sony's movie files are tied to a bunch of other files that should be updated following a deletion. 2. When you're done with all files on the card, format it. Why wouldn't you want to do this? It doesn't take any more time. And you should do it in-camera because, as mentioned, Sony requires a number of subfolders and files to be present on the card. If you format the card in a computer first, the camera will have to build that folder and file structure anyway. 3. Every once in a while it could be a good idea to full format (not quick format) the card using a computer - especially if the card has already misbehaved in some way. The full format exercises and refreshes more of the data areas, so it might correct, or at least identify, any problems. That's why a full format takes much longer. Edited by sybersitizen - 15 February 2012 at 15:53 |
||
jdkeck
Senior Member Joined: 27 June 2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 946 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 15 February 2012 at 16:28 | |
i have several memory cards from different manufacturers, the only issues i have had were with an adata 16 gb card, it would loose one raw file every time i shot with it, so i dont use it. right now i have 2 32gb 433x transcend cards, i have had no issues with them. I understand the multiple card issue, and if you are a pro, shooting high end on site shots, I would probably agree. I am not a pro, i do shot some on site stuff, but since i have not had an issue with the cards I use, I have not worried about it. For me, a large card allows me to not have to worry about changing cards often, and if i go on vacation, i will usually download them every night.
|
||
a850,cz24-70,, sony 35 f1.8, sony 70-300g, minolta 70-210f4, sigma 70-200 f2.8hsm is, sigma 100-300f4
|
||
Wayne09
Senior Member Joined: 28 February 2009 Country: United States Location: WA - USA Status: Offline Posts: 1329 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 15 February 2012 at 16:34 | |
I am not sure what you are referring to??? The CF card has no pins, they are in the reader/camera. The same caution applies though, the pins in readers, especially, are vulnerable. I have had one 16GB Sandisk failure. They replaced the card. |
||
C & C always welcome,
Wayne |
||
AutumnRose
Senior Member Joined: 11 June 2011 Country: United States Location: Oak Creek, WI Status: Offline Posts: 1154 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 12 March 2012 at 01:48 | |
Most of my CF, SD and MS cards are Sandisk. I download with my computer's built in card reader and format the cards in the camera. I use 4GB or 8GB MS in the second slot of the camera for backup. I have switched cards from one camera to another; when I buy a bigger capacity card it goes in the higher resolution camera, and it's card moves down to another camera. I've never had a problem with any of my cards but, I did purchase a Sandisk Extreme III 4 GB CF card from Best Buy that was DOA.
|
||
Kathi
A900, A77, A37, A700, A580, NEX6, 800si, Maxxum 5 and a few lenses |
||
MartyMoose
Senior Member Joined: 01 October 2010 Country: United States Location: Seattle, WA Status: Offline Posts: 1230 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 12 March 2012 at 02:07 | |
I've never had any problems with CF cards. I've even washed & dried one in my pants pocket and it still works.
|
||
ILCE's a6000, a7, a7ii, a6400
CZ Batis 25, 85, SEL's 55/1.8, 35/1.4, 16-70/4, 24-70/4, 70-200/4, 90/2.8G Macro, 55-210/4.5-6.3, 16-50/3.5-5.6, Rokinon E 12/2, and a modest collection of vintage lenses |
||
waleskeg
Senior Member Joined: 09 April 2007 Country: United States Location: Metro Phila Status: Offline Posts: 2916 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 12 March 2012 at 02:34 | |
Most of mine are Lexar and they are faultless for me. Actually have never had any problems with Lexar, Sandisk or Kingston which are the 3 brands I use.
|
||
Jozioau
Alpha Eyes group Joined: 13 May 2007 Country: Australia Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Posts: 10433 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 12 March 2012 at 03:42 | |
The only CF card failure I experienced was in a card I had purchased new on eBay from what looked like a reputable dealer.
However, I subsequently found that it was a fake, and lost images taken with it - they looked OK on the back screen of my a700 at the time I shot them, but when I downloaded onto the computer there were some missing parts of images and interference patterns across others. Here is a link to a comprehensive illustrated guide to picking fake CF cards: http://reviews.ebay.com.au/FAKE-SanDisk-Extreme-Compact-Flash-Cards-Exposed_W0QQugidZ10000000001449653 And a similar guide to picking fake Memory Sticks: http://reviews.ebay.com.au/FAKE-Sony-Memory-Stick-Pro-Duo-MagicGate-Cards-Exposed_W0QQugidZ10000000001535703. When I identified the CF card I bought as a fake, I reported to eBay and got my money back, but did lose images, and as others have said here, only get your memory cards from reliable sources. The fakes look very like the real thing until you check the fine details against those links above. Joe |
||
"Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst" - Henri Cartier-Bresson
My FlickrPro site |
||
> Forum Home > Equipment forums > Other photographic topics | Page <1 34567> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.