Pure portraits |
Page 123 18> |
Author | |
Angusdog
Newbie Joined: 05 May 2007 Location: New Zealand Status: Offline Posts: 27 |
Topic: Pure portraits Posted: 27 May 2007 at 13:18 |
There didn't seem to be any threads for just portraits, and since the discipline has really grabbed my interest I thought I start one. The pic below is my first result using strobes, so a first attempt at lighting using a large softbox to the left of the pic, and a fill softbox umbrella to the right.
I won't claim it's great, but since it's my son I think it's pretty good. If I had more time, or rather a more patient son, I'd work on shortening the DoF to blur the background. And try and get a catchlight to ping the eyes out a bit. Actually looking at it now, I'd also crop the right a little. (It's a big temptation to do the above in Photoshop, but that defeats the purpose of learning to control the light somewhat.) Edited by Angusdog - 27 May 2007 at 13:19 |
|
Turerkan
Emeritus group Moderator emeritus Joined: 11 February 2006 Location: Turkey Status: Offline Posts: 6253 |
Posted: 27 May 2007 at 13:53 |
i think its dark overall and not sharp enough.
another light source from the right side would really help. and the softness looks like from JPEG artifacts. Try to choose less compression next time:) thanks for posting. |
|
Themisa
Senior Member Joined: 24 May 2007 Country: Netherlands Location: Helmond Status: Offline Posts: 492 |
Posted: 27 May 2007 at 20:46 |
Hallo Angusdog, working with light is something else, ain't it. Just one good advice. Try to work it out with the camerasettings and your lightning sets. You can always do some work at the computer, but everything you can manage with the camera is better (IMHO). For the rest..keep on shooting. (ok..another suggestion, use a doll or a mannequin doll (right word ?!?)to try some lightning settings, they won't run away and also will be still for a long lime LOL!!)
Here are two portraits I took, one with studio lighting (just 2 Minolta 5600HS wireless, an umbrella and a reflector)and the other one outsite with a 5600 HS mounted on a tripod with a small softbox attached to it, also used wireless. And as you can see, still learning every day !! Greatings Theo |
|
I'm back... using the A57...Have a nice day everyone...
|
|
eddyizm
Senior Member Joined: 26 January 2007 Country: United States Location: California Status: Offline Posts: 2324 |
Posted: 27 May 2007 at 21:02 |
some bounce experiments as well ;-)
|
|
Angusdog
Newbie Joined: 05 May 2007 Location: New Zealand Status: Offline Posts: 27 |
Posted: 28 May 2007 at 02:29 |
Thanks for the advice, and as it was my first image posting I'm very open to suggestions. The image as posted was saved out of Photoshop as JPG with lower quality than I'd use for non-online stuff. However, it was shot as JPG and I had to pull the midpoints up more than I'd like, I'll shoot only as RAW from now on(Which means I'm off to buy some more CF cards). I've also got a flash meter on the way which will help, no doubt.
|
|
David_S
Senior Member Joined: 20 May 2006 Country: United States Location: Ohio Status: Offline Posts: 2607 |
Posted: 28 May 2007 at 02:58 |
This topic has perfect timing so I hope you don't mind if I join in. I have always been poor at shooting portraits. My daughter wants me to shoot her graduatuion portraits next month. These two little girls came into our world last night and I think they are going to be perfect subjects to practice on. Both were taking right after delivery so I softened them up a little bit to make them a bit more pleasing to look at. Both shot with KM 5D, 50mm 1.7 and Sony 56 flash camera mounted and bounced off the ceiling. Any advise on how to improve under these conditions is very welcome since I'll be returning to the hospital tomorrow to have another go at them.
Thanks, DS This one F1.7 This one f4 |
|
One day at a time
|
|
Bob S.
Senior Member Joined: 14 March 2006 Country: United States Location: Central Ohio Status: Offline Posts: 635 |
Posted: 28 May 2007 at 04:14 |
Here are a few portraits that I've done - all taken with the 7D.
1. Glamour Portrait: 2. Family Portrait: 3. Child Portrait Bob S. |
|
Sony: A850+VG|A700+VG
Minolta: 20|24|28|50|50M|100M|24-50|28-85|28-135|35-70|35-105|Beercan|80-200/2.8|100-200 Sigma: 500/4.5 Tokina: 17|100-300/4 |
|
brettania
Admin Group Dyxum factotum Joined: 17 July 2005 Country: New Zealand Location: Auckland Status: Offline Posts: 20649 |
Posted: 28 May 2007 at 04:40 |
Simon RAW+jpg is even better if you can get it on the A100 (I'm a 7D owner so don't know all the specs off the top of my head.) Reason is that often the jpg will be fine and all you need, but if you want to do some serious processing stuff done and the best file possible the RAW gives you that. I also think the left of Sean's face is a bit too dark -- it has suggestions of a black eye. Having good lighting and mastering it will keep you busy for while. Just had a look through your Flikr pics and many of the Wellington scenes bring back memories of my 21 years there. Welcome to Dyxum. - |
|
jaquoval
Senior Member Joined: 09 October 2005 Country: Canada Location: Manitoba Status: Offline Posts: 228 |
Posted: 29 May 2007 at 21:53 |
A spontaneous one from last week.
7D; Vivitar 100-3.5 |
|
Doug
X700 7D α300 α500 |
|
Entropy
Senior Member Joined: 02 January 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 979 |
Posted: 29 May 2007 at 22:21 |
eddyizm - I love that first shot of yours. A really striking portrait.
|
|
α700+VG | α100 | T17-50 | S18-70 | M50/1.7 | M200/2.8HS
|
|
Eugene
Senior Member Joined: 10 January 2007 Country: United Kingdom Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Posts: 180 |
Posted: 29 May 2007 at 23:37 |
A100 + Tamron 90SP over exposed intentionally, any comments? |
|
A700 70-200/2.8 HVL-56 50/1.7 70-210/4 3600HSD 17-50/2.8 90/2.8 10-20/4-5.6 M42 135/2.8 85/2
My flickr |
|
jpink
Senior Member Joined: 25 September 2006 Country: United Kingdom Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 557 |
Posted: 30 May 2007 at 00:14 |
This isn't really my forte, but I've been working on it. Here's a few of me and my kids, since I can't afford real models. I usually do my self-portraits late at night after my wife and kids have gone to bed. My wife thinks I'm nuts LOL. Hope you enjoy them.
|
|
8000i | KM 7D + VC-7D | Tamron 17-50 2.8 D | KM 18-70 3.5-5.6D | KM 28-75 2.8D | 50 1.7 | 50 2.8 Macro | 100 2.8 Macro D | 70-210 4 Beercan | 75-300 4.5-5.6 Big Beercan | 500 8 Reflex | Sony HVL-F56AM
|
|
MiPr
Admin Group Mikre Dyxum Administrator Joined: 25 August 2006 Country: Poland Location: Wroclaw Status: Offline Posts: 22273 |
Posted: 30 May 2007 at 11:28 |
Do candid shots count also, or should it be a "formal" portrait?
If the former, here's my entry - "Oh, that terrible Sun!": |
|
I'm noise-blind. And noise-about-noise-deaf too ... | BTW, Dyxum Weekly Exhibitions don't grow on trees ...
|
|
Maffe
Moderator Group Joined: 11 November 2005 Country: Sweden Location: Sweden Status: Offline Posts: 12404 |
Posted: 02 July 2007 at 23:54 |
This thread I totaly missed!
There must be shots out there to fill 4 threads like this one! One from the day before "One prime challenge" Sigma 24-70/2.8@70/3.2 |
|
> Forum Home > Dyxum Photographs > Themed Views | Page 123 18> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.