FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Questions about the MT24 and inside pictures

Page  12>
Author
analytical View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 30 January 2007
Country: United States
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Posts: 3069
Post Options Post Options   Quote analytical Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Questions about the MT24 and inside pictures
    Posted: 23 September 2014 at 23:44
I have complained before (though not too recently) that my a99 turns on the MT24 flash when I don't want it to. Specifically any time I turn on the camera, any time the camera comes out of power save, and recently I discovered when the camera switches from video to still mode. The A900 doesn't do this, so something clearly slipped by the A99 (and other SLT) code writers. However maybe they didn't bother since most Sony flashes have an air gap power switch, so no software on signal can get through. the MT 24 is a slightly adapted Minolta design with a push-push electronic power switch on the flash, but no cut off from the camera. But I have said most of this before.

This has finally irritated me enough that I though I'd see if I could hack on a real switch. My first step was to open the case to see if there is room for a panel mount type mini switch to fit through the case. Answer: No. So it will have to be surface mount on the outside.

So next issue: which wire might work? Looking at mhohner F2 seems like a candidate. But when I open the flash I saw that there were 5 wires, not the four that are listed for flash function. The fifth seems to go to a small switch inside the foot that it depressed when it slides into the shoe. (I checked F58 and the multifunction to quicklock adapter ADP-AMA. They have the switch too.)

What is this switch and connection? No one seems to list it in flash contacts. Is it perhaps a "flash on board" switch that tells the camera that a flash is mounted? If so, would a switch in that line function as an air gap power switch for the MT24?

Pictures follow, with a few comments. I put pictures of the mt24 foot first since I just talked about it, then more or less in the order of disassembly.

























12mi SW of Glen Rose,TX
photos
equipment
 



Back to Top
IanL View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 30 December 2010
Country: Great Britain
Location: Jersey,C.I.
Status: Offline
Posts: 2126
Post Options Post Options   Quote IanL Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 September 2014 at 09:07
The function of the switch is to tell the system whether the flash unit is mounted on the camera, or on an off-camera shoe or stand, which has a small recess on the rail to receive the switch probe. When the probe is pressed in, the system acts as if the flash is on camera (e.g. ADI is active).

I assume that the flash reports the switch position to the camera via the serial data link on pins F2 and F3.



Edited by IanL - 24 September 2014 at 09:14
Ian
Back to Top
matthiaspaul View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 08 September 2006
Country: Germany
Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Post Options Post Options   Quote matthiaspaul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 September 2014 at 10:54
Originally posted by analytical analytical wrote:


So next issue: which wire might work? Looking at mhohner F2 seems like a candidate. But when I open the flash I saw that there were 5 wires, not the four that are listed for flash function. The fifth seems to go to a small switch inside the foot that it depressed when it slides into the shoe. (I checked F58 and the multifunction to quicklock adapter ADP-AMA. They have the switch too.)

What is this switch and connection? No one seems to list it in flash contacts. Is it perhaps a "flash on board" switch that tells the camera that a flash is mounted?

Almost. It tells the flash, that it is mounted on the camera, not off-camera. This is important to know for ADI flash metering, because the distance flash-to-subject is only known when it is mounted on the camera (because then it is the same as the distance camera-to-subject).

The camera hot shoe presses the switch, when the flash is mounted. If the flash is used wirelessly, the switch isn't pressed. Also, all off-camera hot shoes feature a small hole, so that the switch isn't pressed when mounted in one of them as well. The exception is the FS-1200, which does not feature the hole as well, but the FS-1200 is - by design - for use on the camera, not an off-camera hotshoe, so no problem here either unless it is misused.

There is no signal wire for the switch, because it is not needed.

The new Multi Interface hotshoe does not feature a switch any more, but the concept continues to be used via pin 21.

More info can be found here:

http://www.mi-fo.de/forum/index.php?showtopic=33060


If so, would a switch in that line function as an air gap power switch for the MT24?

No, but you can cut the F3 signal. The camera will assert "high" on this pin in order to force a "sleeping" flash to wake up. If you cut F3 and insert a switch in there, this can no longer happen for as long as the switch is open.

http://www.mi-fo.de/forum/index.php?showtopic=23553

(Note: Both links do not work at present since we are in maintenance right now. Both their contents should be in Google cache and I hope we will be back online soon as well.)

Greetings,

Matthias

Edited by matthiaspaul - 25 September 2014 at 09:33
--

Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de
Back to Top
analytical View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 30 January 2007
Country: United States
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Posts: 3069
Post Options Post Options   Quote analytical Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 September 2014 at 15:50
Thanks. Now to find a surface mount mini switch. Even if I have to press the original on/off switch after closing the real switch, that's much better than what it does now.
   
======
Earlier I forgot to mention that the unwanted turn-on is even more annoying because in sunlight the small red led indicators are too dim to see without shading them - and then just barely.
12mi SW of Glen Rose,TX
photos
equipment
Back to Top
matthiaspaul View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 08 September 2006
Country: Germany
Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Post Options Post Options   Quote matthiaspaul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 September 2014 at 22:35
Originally posted by analytical analytical wrote:

Now to find a surface mount mini switch. Even if I have to press the original on/off switch after closing the real switch, that's much better than what it does now.

Another idea since you mentioned that you found what looks like a DC power jack inside the flash. If you could determine that this is actually an undocumented power connector (the predecessor Minolta MFC-1000 had a DC power in jack for 4.3V), it might contain a switch disconnecting the batteries while a plug is inserted. If so, you could drill a hole and use a dummy plug to disconnect the batteries from the control unit when not needed.

Greetings,

Matthias

Edited by matthiaspaul - 25 September 2014 at 09:34
--

Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de
Back to Top
matthiaspaul View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 08 September 2006
Country: Germany
Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Post Options Post Options   Quote matthiaspaul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 September 2014 at 22:42
Perhaps it would be possible to use the moveable "head" of the controller as a switch. While there may not be enough room for a power switch, there should at least be enough room for a reed contact and a tiny permanent magnet in series with the F3 signal.

Greetings,

Matthias

Edited by matthiaspaul - 11 October 2014 at 21:32
--

Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de
 



Back to Top
analytical View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 30 January 2007
Country: United States
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Posts: 3069
Post Options Post Options   Quote analytical Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 September 2014 at 01:01
Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

Another idea since you mentioned that you found what looks like a DC power jack inside the flash. If you could determine that this is actually an undocumented power connector (the predecessor Minolta MFC-1000 had a DC power in jack for 4.2V), it might contain a switch disconnecting the batteries while a plug is inserted. If so, you could drill a hole and use a dummy plug to disconnect the batteries from the control unit when not needed.
In pictures, the Minolta 2400 version of this flash appeared to have a DC connector with case opening at this location, so it's suspicious.    
12mi SW of Glen Rose,TX
photos
equipment
Back to Top
matthiaspaul View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 08 September 2006
Country: Germany
Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Post Options Post Options   Quote matthiaspaul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 September 2014 at 09:32
Originally posted by analytical analytical wrote:

In pictures, the Minolta 2400 version of this flash appeared to have a DC connector with case opening at this location, so it's suspicious.

Yes, nominally it was for 6.0V DC in (max), but the suitable AC adapter AC-10 was only available in Japan. IIRC it had (unregulated) 4.3V / 2.2A DC output. The details can be found in these threads:

http://www.mi-fo.de/forum/index.php?showtopic=14229
http://www.mi-fo.de/forum/index.php?showtopic=13034

So, if that connector has a built-in switch (which is quite likely), you're done.

Greetings,

Matthias

Edited by matthiaspaul - 03 October 2014 at 06:59
--

Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de
Back to Top
analytical View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 30 January 2007
Country: United States
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Posts: 3069
Post Options Post Options   Quote analytical Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 September 2014 at 15:35
And there is even a circle on the case that appears to line up with the plug. Also here's a closer look at the plug (or more correctly the "receptacle" or "socket". The "plug" is on the cord.) Is this a standard plug size?





Edited by analytical - 25 September 2014 at 15:40
12mi SW of Glen Rose,TX
photos
equipment
Back to Top
analytical View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 30 January 2007
Country: United States
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Posts: 3069
Post Options Post Options   Quote analytical Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 September 2014 at 16:01
And isn't the 6V connection more likely to be for a battery pack than an AC adapter? e.g. Mhohner site labels it that way.

mt-2400 spec page
12mi SW of Glen Rose,TX
photos
equipment
Back to Top
matthiaspaul View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 08 September 2006
Country: Germany
Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Post Options Post Options   Quote matthiaspaul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 September 2014 at 17:17
Originally posted by analytical analytical wrote:

And isn't the 6V connection more likely to be for a battery pack than an AC adapter? e.g. Mhohner site labels it that way.

mt-2400 spec page

I'm not aware of a Minolta or Sony battery pack for the Minolta MFC-1000. However, you can, of course, use an external 6.0V DC battery pack to power the control unit. You can trust the information in Minolta-Forum to be correct - it's all carefully researched and/or tested. ;-)

The Minolta EP-1 and EP-2 have completely different connectors.

The point I was trying to make is that the only external power supply offically available for the MFC-1000 was the AC-10, which is specified for 4.3V output only. Most probably Minolta chosed to use a lower voltage in order to keep the MFC-1000 from overheating.

Greetings,

Matthias
--

Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de
Back to Top
matthiaspaul View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 08 September 2006
Country: Germany
Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Post Options Post Options   Quote matthiaspaul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 September 2014 at 17:28
Originally posted by analytical analytical wrote:

And there is even a circle on the case that appears to line up with the plug. Also here's a closer look at the plug (or more correctly the "receptacle" or "socket". The "plug" is on the cord.) Is this a standard plug size?





Isn't it a pity that Sony removed this and the connector for the ring flash from the HVL-MT24AM? I wonder who made this decision at Sony and why? They could just have used the original parts, it would have been cheaper for them and avoided alot of problems users are running into now...

Unfortunately, there is no "standard" size for these kinds of plugs. While some are more common than others there are about 50 different types differing only in fractions of a millimeter of the inner and outer diameters. You will have to measure or try it out.
(I might be able to provide the exact dimensions once Minolta-Forum is back online again, but since our harddisk died out of sudden, it will take a couple of days to restore the backups.)

Greetings,

Matthias

Edited by matthiaspaul - 03 October 2014 at 15:50
--

Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de
Back to Top
analytical View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 30 January 2007
Country: United States
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Posts: 3069
Post Options Post Options   Quote analytical Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 September 2014 at 18:41
I'm confused by references to mfc-1000. The Minolta predecessor to the Sony HVL-MT24 was the Minolta 2400, which apparently had a battery pack connection. Same mhohner link as before. Also I found a picture on Pete Ganzel web site linked below. Near resolution limit, but the label on the side seems to say DC IN 6V



BTW there is no ring flash socket hiding inside the MT24, nor a pcb that would mount one. The why is likely because Sony didn't carry over the Minolta ring flash, but introduced a new ring light (not a flash).    



Edited by analytical - 25 September 2014 at 18:48
12mi SW of Glen Rose,TX
photos
equipment
Back to Top
michelb View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 26 August 2009
Country: Canada
Location: Montréal
Status: Offline
Posts: 746
Post Options Post Options   Quote michelb Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 September 2014 at 01:50
Originally posted by analytical analytical wrote:

I'm confused by references to mfc-1000. The Minolta predecessor to the Sony HVL-MT24 was the Minolta 2400, which apparently had a battery pack connection. Same mhohner link as before. Also I found a picture on Pete Ganzel web site linked below. Near resolution limit, but the label on the side seems to say DC IN 6V

BTW there is no ring flash socket hiding inside the MT24, nor a pcb that would mount one. The why is likely because Sony didn't carry over the Minolta ring flash, but introduced a new ring light (not a flash).    



The confusion that may arise referring to the MFC-1000, T2400 twin flash and R1200 ring flash is probably due to the fact Minolta sold each of these separately AND in Kits including either the R1200 Ring flash along with the MFC-1000 controller or another kit consisting of the T2400 Twin light with the same MFC-1000 controller.
This was logical since the R1200 ring flash was the same as the 1200AF flash (as the IB says) so someone who already got the old 1200AF was capable of using the ring flash in TTL by purchasing only the controller and later on could add the twin flash without having to get a new controller.
Sony is only selling it as a kit since they removed the ring flash connector.


References to the Minolta AC adapter are in the instruction manuals i have are on page 6:

The AC Adapter for this Macro Flash Controller is available only in
Japan. The use of an AC Adapter other than the specified unit can
permanently damage the flash and cause heat or fire.

The only reference i found about this adapter was from a french reseller web site ( selling Minolta parts and accessories) saying its part no was 8843-410 ( for 176 Euros !!!! )
Funny since the adapter was supposed to be only available in Japan.

Michel B
Back to Top
Dyxum main page >  Forum Home > Equipment forums > Lighting Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.

Monitor calibration strip

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer

In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania

Feel free to contact us if needed.