Sony 70 - 400 A Rediscovering |
Page <12 |
Author | |
Phil Wood ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 24 March 2013 Country: United Kingdom Location: England Status: Offline Posts: 2374 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
@Gary, I do have an E-mount body (A6000) which I bought as a pocket camera and have added an LA-EA4 for use with my A-mount lenses - I don't use the adapter much because I much prefer my A77 and A99ii bodies. I don't have many SSM lenses so haven't got an LA-EA3 (in any case I think it doesn't work well with the A6000).
I have considered the Tamron, but I have a Sigma 170-500 (not the greatest lens) which I find doesn't really go wide enough and I don't use much beyond 400. So 70-400 is a more attractive range - and it doesn't hurt that it's a bit cheaper. Mind you, I'd like to find one in the UK for the equivalent of 800 CAN - 800 GBP is closer. @Addy if that is the difference I certainly prefer white and AF speed always helps, but I don't do much action stuff so AF speed it doesn't matter that much and white is still not to my taste. Perhaps I should consider the Tamron because it's black. |
|
![]() |
|
Fred_S ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 12 January 2017 Country: Netherlands Location: Noord Holland Status: Offline Posts: 11602 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's my to go lens (on A99ii) with nature walks, zoo visits etc.
I love it. Many pic's shared here on Dyxum. It's versatile starting at 70mm, and sharp. Even shot some nice semi macro shots with it. With the Soligor (Kenko copy) 1.4xTC it AF still works. Boght it second hand too and I see them going here for around 700 Euro now. |
|
![]() |
|
Basil ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 03 December 2009 Country: United States Location: Minnesota Status: Offline Posts: 2650 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You can always add a lens wrap/neoprene cover to the silver beast and call it good. I only see silver on the barrel when zooming. ![]() I have both the Sony and the Tamron. I can use the Sony handheld or with a monopod, while the Tamron is best on a tripod. Your mileage may vary. |
|
To see is to enjoy. To see beyond is to rejoice.
A77Mark II; A57; A850; A700; NEX 6; various film bodies and an ever-changing collection of lenses |
|
![]() |
|
TomV ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 29 September 2015 Country: United States Location: Annapolis MD Status: Offline Posts: 53 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I second your recommendation. I have the 70-400, I and II, two copies of the Tamron G2 and a Sony 500 f4. The 70-400 II is much quicker for AF over the I. The Tamrons compare favorably to the Sony 500 for opticals. The Sony is faster for AF. I see no real degradation between the 600mm and shorter focal lengths. A very nice lens. |
|
TomV
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Page <12 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.