FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

TC Guide II 200/2.8 + 1.4X 1.7X 2X Tests

Page  <1234>
Author
eccl View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group

Joined: 07 December 2005
Country: Canada
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Posts: 757
Post Options Post Options   Quote eccl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 October 2007 at 05:43
I have added 3 more teleconverters:

Promaster 1.7X
Kenko 2X MC7
Phoenix 2X MC7
16/2.8 24/2.8 28/2 28/2.8 35/2 50/1.4 50/1.7 50/2.8 85/1.4 100/2 100/2.8 180/3.5 200/2.8 300/4 400/5.6 500/7.2 500/8

Zoom, TC and other lenses too numerous to list!
 



Back to Top
jrfarrar View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 28 August 2005
Country: United States
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Posts: 331
Post Options Post Options   Quote jrfarrar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 October 2007 at 17:49

Interesting. The matched TC shots look better to me than the zoomed in originals.
Back to Top
eccl View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group

Joined: 07 December 2005
Country: Canada
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Posts: 757
Post Options Post Options   Quote eccl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 October 2007 at 03:35
I have added a 140% and 200% of original images for comparison.
16/2.8 24/2.8 28/2 28/2.8 35/2 50/1.4 50/1.7 50/2.8 85/1.4 100/2 100/2.8 180/3.5 200/2.8 300/4 400/5.6 500/7.2 500/8

Zoom, TC and other lenses too numerous to list!
Back to Top
eccl View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group

Joined: 07 December 2005
Country: Canada
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Posts: 757
Post Options Post Options   Quote eccl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 October 2007 at 16:43
Originally posted by bengeo bengeo wrote:


Very interesting comparison. One thing I did notice was that the "1.4X TCs Compare Center @ F4" 200 + 1.4x image says "F22" on it?

Andy


Oops, I picked the wrong picture, I'll update it with the correct one ASAP. Thanks for letting me know.


16/2.8 24/2.8 28/2 28/2.8 35/2 50/1.4 50/1.7 50/2.8 85/1.4 100/2 100/2.8 180/3.5 200/2.8 300/4 400/5.6 500/7.2 500/8

Zoom, TC and other lenses too numerous to list!
Back to Top
tankm View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 22 May 2006
Location: Singapore
Status: Offline
Posts: 246
Post Options Post Options   Quote tankm Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 October 2007 at 15:26
Thanks for sharing. Great info and useful information for all.
Visit my photo album at http://tankm.fotki.com
Back to Top
bengeo View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 09 September 2005
Country: United Kingdom
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Posts: 344
Post Options Post Options   Quote bengeo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 October 2007 at 14:57

Very interesting comparison. One thing I did notice was that the "1.4X TCs Compare Center @ F4" 200 + 1.4x image says "F22" on it?

Andy
 



Back to Top
revdocjim View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Joined: 11 September 2006
Country: Japan
Location: Mt. Akagi
Status: Offline
Posts: 8607
Post Options Post Options   Quote revdocjim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 October 2007 at 14:25
Originally posted by eccl eccl wrote:



If the 200 G is HS it should have a focus hold button.


Yes, but I believe he was wondering whether his was an upgraded original or not. The original doesn't have the focus hold button but if it has been upgraded I believe the AF speed is similar to the newer version. I don't know an absolute way to verify if it has been upgraded...

Originally posted by eccl eccl wrote:


I only use ver II or D or Sony TC with my 200 G. I believe ver I has faster focusing due to the difference in gearing ratio. You cannot go wrong with either ver I or ver II as the optical still remain the same.


I recently switched from a ver.II to a ver.I on my 1.4X
The ver.II has a gear ratio of 1:2, where as the ver.I is 1:1
I have visually verified this difference. I have experienced no problems at all with either version T/C on the 200G. Ver.I is faster though. Same speed as without any T/C at all.

I haven't found a ver.I 2X yet so I'm still using the ver.II
The gear ration on the ver.II 2X is 1:4 but I'm not sure what the gear ration is for the ver.I 2X My guess would be 1:2

This test was very helpful for me because I never realized what a difference stopping down makes. Without the T/C the 200 is such a sharp lens that I never worry about stopping down. Also, I guess I somehow thought that at f/4 with the 1.4X or f/5.6 with the 2X you are already stopped down but the fact of the matter is that the lens is wide open.

Thanks for the great info.
Gallery A7S, A7Rii, Batis 18/2.8, 25/2 Sony 35/2.8, 55/1.8, 90/2.8M, 24-105/4, Minolta 135STF, 200/2.8 Blog
Back to Top
brettania View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Dyxum factotum

Joined: 17 July 2005
Country: New Zealand
Location: Auckland
Status: Offline
Posts: 20649
Post Options Post Options   Quote brettania Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 October 2007 at 09:49

As usual Ed you have come up with something informative and useful -- a magnum opus on tcons.

Thanks very much.
Back to Top
eccl View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group

Joined: 07 December 2005
Country: Canada
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Posts: 757
Post Options Post Options   Quote eccl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 October 2007 at 21:12
Originally posted by ab012 ab012 wrote:

very interesting results. damn the 200G is good

with the 200G+2xAPO - is the change in colour of the 'united' when wide open CA or something else?


I believe the TC has something to do with the color cast.
16/2.8 24/2.8 28/2 28/2.8 35/2 50/1.4 50/1.7 50/2.8 85/1.4 100/2 100/2.8 180/3.5 200/2.8 300/4 400/5.6 500/7.2 500/8

Zoom, TC and other lenses too numerous to list!
Back to Top
eccl View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group

Joined: 07 December 2005
Country: Canada
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Posts: 757
Post Options Post Options   Quote eccl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 October 2007 at 21:09
Originally posted by dd001 dd001 wrote:

Wow, nice and interesting comparison, thanks for taking the time to do it!

David

PS: One typo I think:
The last item should not be:
200 APO + 2X APO TC vs Sigma 400 APO TELEMACRO vs 100-400 APO Center F16
But
200 APO + 2X APO TC vs Sigma 400 APO TELEMACRO vs 100-400 APO Edge F16


Thank you for letting me know. I have fixed the typo
16/2.8 24/2.8 28/2 28/2.8 35/2 50/1.4 50/1.7 50/2.8 85/1.4 100/2 100/2.8 180/3.5 200/2.8 300/4 400/5.6 500/7.2 500/8

Zoom, TC and other lenses too numerous to list!
Back to Top
eccl View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group

Joined: 07 December 2005
Country: Canada
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Posts: 757
Post Options Post Options   Quote eccl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 October 2007 at 21:08
Originally posted by gsaronni gsaronni wrote:

Great work. Someday I will get the Minolta 2X APO TC, but still not decided because I dont know if my 200G is HS or not(the seller told it was upgraded, but I dont know how to check)

Wich version would be more interesting, the I or II? I have heard the II version is very slow with non HS 200G

Regards


If the 200 G is HS it should have a focus hold button. I only use ver II or D or Sony TC with my 200 G. I believe ver I has faster focusing due to the difference in gearing ratio. You cannot go wrong with either ver I or ver II as the optical still remain the same.
16/2.8 24/2.8 28/2 28/2.8 35/2 50/1.4 50/1.7 50/2.8 85/1.4 100/2 100/2.8 180/3.5 200/2.8 300/4 400/5.6 500/7.2 500/8

Zoom, TC and other lenses too numerous to list!
Back to Top
eccl View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group

Joined: 07 December 2005
Country: Canada
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Posts: 757
Post Options Post Options   Quote eccl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 October 2007 at 21:05
Originally posted by jrfarrar jrfarrar wrote:


Fantastic and thanks for your time doing that!

Of course you knew I was going to ask for more though right?

How about adding in the exact same crop but just with the 200/2.8? Show the difference in blowing up vs adding TC?

Clearly the matched converter outperformed but I was surprised how much difference in color between them.


Good idea, I'll try to add the same crop of the 200/2.8 blow up 1.4 times and 2 times.

I was surprised too regarding the color as I have not changed anything on my camera (A100 AWB on tripod 2sec mirror locked up with RC-1000S) just using different TC.
16/2.8 24/2.8 28/2 28/2.8 35/2 50/1.4 50/1.7 50/2.8 85/1.4 100/2 100/2.8 180/3.5 200/2.8 300/4 400/5.6 500/7.2 500/8

Zoom, TC and other lenses too numerous to list!
Back to Top
dd001 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 16 August 2006
Country: France
Location: Bordeaux
Status: Offline
Posts: 2140
Post Options Post Options   Quote dd001 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 October 2007 at 18:29
Wow, nice and interesting comparison, thanks for taking the time to do it!

David

PS: One typo I think:
The last item should not be:
200 APO + 2X APO TC vs Sigma 400 APO TELEMACRO vs 100-400 APO Center F16
But
200 APO + 2X APO TC vs Sigma 400 APO TELEMACRO vs 100-400 APO Edge F16
David - My Gallery
Back to Top
ab012 View Drop Down
Emeritus group
Emeritus group

Joined: 10 September 2005
Country: Australia
Status: Offline
Posts: 2677
Post Options Post Options   Quote ab012 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25 October 2007 at 18:20
very interesting results. damn the 200G is good

with the 200G+2xAPO - is the change in colour of the 'united' when wide open CA or something else?
Bernard

fun fun fun
Back to Top
Dyxum main page >  Forum Home > Equipment forums > Lens Talk > Adapters and converters Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.

Monitor calibration strip

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer

In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania

Feel free to contact us if needed.