Testing the Tamron 50-400mm |
Author | ||
Almazar80 ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 16 May 2008 Country: United States Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 3136 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 16 January 2023 at 19:10 |
|
![]() |
||
Hezu ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 13 October 2007 Country: Finland Location: HKI/KSNK Status: Offline Posts: 3795 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The birds in #4 and #6 look super grainy, what you have done when processing these? Are these heavy crops or is there some other reason the noise patterns shows so clearly?
|
||
![]() |
||
Almazar80 ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 16 May 2008 Country: United States Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 3136 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
The fourth and six images are heavily cropped and they were underexposed when I took the pictures. I wanted to test the lens not only when the exposure was correct but also when the exposure was way off (and the focusing was off on 4 and 6). A lot of compensation and processing was applied to those two pictures. I think the lens is fine. I just need to learn how to use it better. It's not the 200-600, which focuses faster and seems to be more accurate in focusing. On the other hand, you can't focus closely on the 200-600 and I just don't want to carry a heavier lens in most instances. I really like the 50-400, but there is a learning curve on figuring out how to use it well.
The point of 4 and 6 is to see how much detail was kept (or lost) when the image is underexposed heavily and a heavy crop is applied. This was actually the first time I've had time to take some pictures in months. A lot of people with Sony cameras and lenses walking about. |
||
![]() |
||
addy landzaat ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 22 April 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Online Posts: 13552 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I expected this to be by Heikki because I know he recently also picked up one. Nice series, #7 is the stand out for me.
I was a bit confused when you wrote "I don't want to carry a heavier lens" when talking about an 1155gr lens, but then I remembered you not only have the A6600 but also an A7m4 that fits this lens as well. Enjoy it! |
||
Why not follow me on Instagram? @Addy_101
|
||
![]() |
||
Hezu ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 13 October 2007 Country: Finland Location: HKI/KSNK Status: Offline Posts: 3795 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
||
addy landzaat ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 22 April 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Online Posts: 13552 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Yes, I understand. But I was thinking, if you want to use it exclusively on APS-C the Sony 7-350G is half the weight and not much shorter. That is why I have both the 70-350G for use with my A6400 and the Tamron 150-500 for use with my A7r4. But if you want to use the lighter lens with full-frame as well, the 50-400 makes a lot of sense.
I'll wait for your pictures ![]() |
||
Why not follow me on Instagram? @Addy_101
|
||
![]() |
||
Almazar80 ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 16 May 2008 Country: United States Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 3136 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
One thing the 50-400mm shares wtih the 70-350G lens from Sony is the smaller minimum focusing distance. I used to have the Sony lens (which is great), but I sold it since I couldn't use it with my full frame body. The Tamron is slightly larger, heavier, but at 50mm it almost works as a macro lens. Which means I don't have to carry the 90mm macro all the time.
It's not as fast focusing or as accurate in focusing as the Sony though, but it is very good. Now, I can bring the A6600, the Tamron, and go for quick walks without the extra weight. And the pictures of leaves and frozen bubbles in the water would not have been as easy to get with the 200-600mm. My lightweight kit is the 50-400, the 11mm 1.8 and the Sigma 18-50. Really useful stuff. Now, top find the time and opportunity to use them.... Thanks for the comments. |
||
![]() |
||
Robbie ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 07 February 2007 Country: Germany Location: Bremen Status: Offline Posts: 1379 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
There was recently a firmware update for the Tamron 50 - 400 mm (end of 2022), which should mainly improve the autofocus. Have you already installed the new firmware?
I also have my eye on this lens as it seems to offer a very good compromise between range and compactness with good image quality. |
||
![]() |
||
Fred_S ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 12 January 2017 Country: Netherlands Location: Noord Holland Status: Offline Posts: 12196 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It seems an interesting option, certainly after the update.
I saw a review of that firmware update on youtube, it brought the succes rate of a dog running towards the photographer from 17 to 75% or so. |
||
![]() |
||
Hezu ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 13 October 2007 Country: Finland Location: HKI/KSNK Status: Offline Posts: 3795 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.