The A77 thread (cont'd) |
Page 123 81> |
Author | |
Micholand
Admin Group Knowledgebase Contributor Joined: 30 October 2005 Country: Germany Location: MUC Status: Offline Posts: 19015 |
Topic: The A77 thread (cont'd) Posted: 22 June 2011 at 18:26 |
Please use this thread for any A77 rumour discussion!
|
|
JekyllAndHyde
Newbie Joined: 27 March 2011 Location: AT Status: Offline Posts: 9 |
Posted: 22 June 2011 at 21:02 |
next 77 pages to go? :)
but i must say i'm pretty dissapointed with Sony dropping the OVF completely :( i was hoping for some real a700 replacement and not better a55 Edited by JekyllAndHyde - 22 June 2011 at 21:03 |
|
dca1213
Senior Member Joined: 25 December 2008 Country: United States Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Posts: 3780 |
Posted: 22 June 2011 at 21:08 |
+1 |
|
Dennis
|
|
photoman
Senior Member Joined: 17 August 2009 Country: United States Location: Ohio Status: Offline Posts: 373 |
Posted: 22 June 2011 at 21:15 |
ISO above 12800 will be useless. Why not get rid of the higher ISO's and then give us ISO 25 and ISO 50?
|
|
A700, Sig 10-20, 17-70, 24 f2.8 400 f5.6 telemacro, Min 85 f1.4, 50 f1.7, 70-210, Cosina 100 macro,
|
|
Dave_Anderson
Senior Member Joined: 08 July 2009 Country: United States Location: Boulder Crk, CA Status: Offline Posts: 1508 |
Posted: 22 June 2011 at 21:22 |
Because there is this idea among ignorant marketing types that higher numbers sell(except in golf equipment sales). Kidding aside, I'd guess that for a sensor to be usable at ISO 25 it would have to be less sensitive overall, or it would just saturate. So your ISO 200-3200 sensor would then be ISO 25-400, not counting "extended ISOs". Of course it's not so simple as that but I don't think I'm too far wide of the mark. |
|
α900+VG|α100|F20|2xF58|16-35,24-70,135Z|STF|70-400G|50,85 1.4|16,20,28,100M,80-200APO f/2.8|28-135|500f/8|1x-3x Macro|2xMFC-1000|Tiltall+RRS, Bellows
|
|
dca1213
Senior Member Joined: 25 December 2008 Country: United States Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Posts: 3780 |
Posted: 22 June 2011 at 21:42 |
Just break out the ND filters, if you're gonna have a "semi translucent" film on one end of the lens you may as well throw one on the front end too |
|
Dennis
|
|
Howard_S
Senior Member Joined: 20 March 2008 Country: United Kingdom Location: Oxford Status: Offline Posts: 5575 |
Posted: 22 June 2011 at 21:48 |
I'll be interested to see what the so-called 'NEX Pro' has. A 24MP sensor, a good EVF and build quality (to match that in the A77), and no translucent mirror. What's not to like?
|
|
tigertimb
Alpha Eyes group Joined: 22 November 2007 Country: United Kingdom Status: Offline Posts: 5630 |
Posted: 22 June 2011 at 21:49 |
I'd like the low ISO too, but it is interesting to see over at DXO that the A580 has better ISO 100 than the A900, so I'm both hoping and expecting that there will be improvements with the low ISO too; less noise and greater dynamic range. And there's speculation that the really high ISO might be done the same way that it's done on the NEX - several shots fired rapidly at very high ISO and then aligned and merged with the purpose of getting rid of the noise. You can't use it in every circumstance, but it can work exceedingly well and is not just a gimmick - using it, I can shoot at ISO 6400 and get shots that are at least as clean and sharp as a single shot taken at ISO 1600. |
|
Tim
If you appreciate comments on your photos, how about returning the favour to others . . . |
|
maraten
Senior Member Joined: 23 February 2011 Country: Netherlands Location: The Hague Status: Offline Posts: 211 |
Posted: 22 June 2011 at 21:52 |
New picture @ Sony Alpha Rumors |
|
Sony a99 and some old-school lenses
|
|
jvsanchez
Senior Member Joined: 04 October 2009 Location: Texas, USA Status: Offline Posts: 1607 |
Posted: 22 June 2011 at 21:58 |
a little off topic, but that unmarked lens looks to me suspiciously like a 24-120 f/4 i'd honestly rather have that than a CZ 16-50.
|
|
- Vincent
α7 IV | CZ 55/1.8 | Σ 35/2 C | FE 20-70/4 G | FE 70-200/4 G | FE 200-600/5.6-6.3 G |
|
Beachrider
Senior Member Joined: 21 April 2010 Country: United States Location: Best Wishes Status: Offline Posts: 355 |
Posted: 22 June 2011 at 21:59 |
Why are you guys in-love with an arbitrary ISO number? There is nothing magical about ISO-50. It was just useful because of the inherent sensitivity of photo-chemicals. There isn't any reason to expect sensors to have similar sensitivity.
Am I missing something? |
|
addy landzaat
Senior Member Joined: 22 April 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 15685 |
Posted: 22 June 2011 at 22:17 |
Didn't realise that it was something new. Size wise I would think it could be a 24-105/4 - however that would kill off the 28-75/2.8 as a budget option. I don't know about the size of the Nikon 24-120, however the Canon 24-105/4L is bigger. But Minolta lenses used to be smaller then Canon's and this lens seems slightly bigger then the 24-105/3.5-4.5. It looks different then the 16-105 to me. So, is this the legendary much rumored 24-105/4G? |
|
Why not follow me on Instagram? @Addy_101
|
|
Hezu
Senior Member Joined: 13 October 2007 Country: Finland Location: HKI/KSNK Status: Offline Posts: 4671 |
Posted: 22 June 2011 at 23:18 |
- slower AF speed than in DSLR/SLT models - adapter required for mounting A-mount lenses - with that adapter AF only works with lenses that have builtin motors |
|
tigertimb
Alpha Eyes group Joined: 22 November 2007 Country: United Kingdom Status: Offline Posts: 5630 |
Posted: 22 June 2011 at 23:40 |
From my perspective, it's not so much about wanting ISO-50, as it is about wanting even less noise and greater dynamic range. (Even on the A900 at ISO-200, there is still considerable room for the noise to be improved within the shadows) The current emphasis with new cameras at the moment, all seems to be about improving the high ISO which I'd certainly appreciate on occasions, but more typically, I'm able to shoot at ISO-200 and so improvements there would benefit me more often. And I would guess a typical A900 user might think the same way - if you read any reviews before buying the A900, you already knew that it didn't excel as high ISO performance compared to existing competition, so you probably bought it for other reasons. So it's great to see Sony catching up with high-ISO performance, but I hope they also stay ahead of the curve on their existing strengths and for me this included their low ISO performance, with high dynamic range making a superb combination when coupled with the 24Mp (and ISO 50 also gives benefits for some flash photography, long exposures without the need for ND filters and similarly I frequently hit the 1/8000sec limit when shooting with below f2 on a sunny day (in the UK!) and having ISO 25 would help then too) |
|
Tim
If you appreciate comments on your photos, how about returning the favour to others . . . |
|
> Forum Home > Equipment forums > Camera Talk > A-mount APS-C | Page 123 81> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.