The alpha shutter count tool |
Page <12345 15> |
Author | ||||
Pigman
Newbie Joined: 15 April 2013 Country: United Kingdom Location: Devon Status: Offline Posts: 6 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 April 2013 at 14:16 | |||
And now have added 3 files from my A900, which gave shutter actuations of exactly 1000, using exiftool on the first file. |
||||
analytical
Senior Member Joined: 30 January 2007 Country: United States Location: Texas Status: Offline Posts: 3069 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 April 2013 at 15:05 | |||
Absolutely correct. Maybe a little more detail may help understanding why.. These fields were never in exif in the first place, at least not in the industry standard exif. They are in a category of metadata called "maker notes" that is unique to each manufacturer, and sometimes varies from model to model. Sometimes makernotes are described as a different category of metadata from exif (for example in exiftool) and sometimes as a subset of exif that is not part of the standard. Either way the key point is not standardized. Exif (current version 2.3) is an informal "industry standard" format. Not all manufacturers load all exif fields, but for those that they do load, they follow a standard field designation and data format. Not so for makernotes. So it should be no surprise that photo software handles standardized exif and non-standard makernotes differently. Photo processing software often will copy exif (and iptc) to edited images. But it almost never copies maker notes. If you have anything but an original raw or jpeg from the camera, then makers notes are likely gone. (If you only view an original jpeg that's fine. But if you open it in a editor, then finish with save rather than close, you now have a copy and makersnotes is gone. ) makernotes Sony makernote tags exif tags |
||||
perese
Senior Member Joined: 03 April 2008 Country: United Kingdom Location: Sweden Status: Offline Posts: 167 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 April 2013 at 17:49 | |||
Same here, but when I manually check with the tool I get numbers... I use LR but from my understanding LR does not per default touch the *.arw file it only reads and then produce the XMP files and output to what ever I chose in export. |
||||
a700+VG | a900+VG
Cosina 19-35/3.5-4.5 | M50/1.7 | M28-135/4-4.5 | M75-300/4.5-5.6 V1 http://www.prphoto.se |
||||
RTI
Newbie Joined: 17 April 2013 Country: Moldova Status: Offline Posts: 1 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 April 2013 at 17:50 | |||
Hi,
This is my first post on the forum, though I'm a long time lurker :). I'd like to thank you for the tool you provided. Also for me the tags for A99/A77 seem to work also for my nex-5n.
Maybe someone could also confirm this :) |
||||
Guy
Senior Member Joined: 29 July 2011 Country: Slovenia Status: Offline Posts: 245 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 April 2013 at 18:20 | |||
Well, the ARW problem is now solved.
I have been using a bad algorithm to get the model of the camera, and it failed with ARWs Since the script could not determine the model, it just dumped empty output ... This has now all been fixed. For sony NEX cameras, if you are sure, then just please write here what the Model name of the camera comes out in exif, so that I can add it correctly . The A450/500/550 triplet is now also supported. And I have discovered that the A700 does not have such a counter in the makernotes exif (I have verified even with simple decryption techniques). My guess is that the A3XX series was the first to have this info, and the old KM and KM-based cameras (KM5D, KM7D, A100 and A700) simply do not have this info in the files. |
||||
When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk!
|
||||
Micholand
Admin Group Knowledgebase Contributor Joined: 30 October 2005 Country: Germany Location: MUC Status: Offline Posts: 19015 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 April 2013 at 18:35 | |||
Borut, there's a typo in the SonyTags given for the A900 on your tool site
SONY Alpha A900/A850: Shutter count fields: Sony_FocusInfo_0x0846 = A Sony_FocusInfo_0x0847 = B Sony_FocusInfo_ SUM = A + (B * 256) + (C * 65536) SUM = (C << 16) + (B << 8) + A |
||||
sybersitizen
Senior Member Joined: 04 August 2006 Country: United States Location: California Status: Offline Posts: 14453 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 April 2013 at 18:36 | |||
There is a set of official Minolta diagnostic software for the 7D and 5D that was leaked to the public many years ago. Using that, it is indeed possible to read the shutter actuation count on the 5D directly from the camera - but, oddly, not with the 7D. But true - that stuff is not necessarily written to the files. |
||||
analytical
Senior Member Joined: 30 January 2007 Country: United States Location: Texas Status: Offline Posts: 3069 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 April 2013 at 18:37 | |||
5D and 7D can be read from the camera using a Windows service program and USB connection to the camera. I haven't kept up with whether A100 or A700 equivalent was discovered.
|
||||
clockwork247
Senior Member Joined: 20 December 2010 Status: Offline Posts: 376 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 April 2013 at 18:43 | |||
My little contribution to the thread, the A900 grade 8 at B&H for 1100 USD, that one has 65k+ on it, i asked the used department to check for me. (thanks you B&H used department), i won't be getting that camera, holy snap, some one really liked their A900 :), i barely put 5k on mine in 1 year. how did they put 65k on that unit, amazing.
|
||||
Pigman
Newbie Joined: 15 April 2013 Country: United Kingdom Location: Devon Status: Offline Posts: 6 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 April 2013 at 18:45 | |||
Yes, I can confirm that it now works properly with my A850/A900 ARW files, giving the same values as I got manually with exiftool. I can also check my daughter's A550 now. Thanks. |
||||
deeejay
Groupie Joined: 07 December 2012 Country: Hungary Location: Budapest Status: Offline Posts: 45 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 April 2013 at 19:15 | |||
Hi All,
I can confirm that the tool works properly with a580 ARW and jpeg files, as well. It made me sad when I uploaded some very early photos (under 1K) as the result was "0" from time to time, but got perfect result with any photos (ARW and jpeg) above 1000. The tool handles 100000+ pictures also! Thanks to all contributors!! There's only one more dream of me: to find someone who buys an a99 bundle for me in the US as there's no such offer neither in Hungary, nor in EU. Funds are ready... |
||||
Sony a99II, Sony SAL 1635Z, Sony SAL 2470Z, Sony AF 70-200mm F2.8 G SSM, SAL50F14Z
http://500px.com/ptrlendvai |
||||
sybersitizen
Senior Member Joined: 04 August 2006 Country: United States Location: California Status: Offline Posts: 14453 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 April 2013 at 19:42 | |||
Only the 5D, not the 7D. |
||||
analytical
Senior Member Joined: 30 January 2007 Country: United States Location: Texas Status: Offline Posts: 3069 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 17 April 2013 at 23:48 | |||
I have my A900 set to series form then use Metamorphose to rename files including adding the apropriate 10000 digit to the number.
I tested file a900-33359.ARW The result was Detected Camera Model Name : DSLR-A900 | | | | Sony_FocusInfo_0x0846 = 61 | | | | Sony_FocusInfo_0x0847 = 131 | | | | Sony_FocusInfo_0x0848 = 0 (65536 * 0) + (256 * 131) + 61 = 33597. My numbering system system is slightly off from count, since camera files go from 9999 to 0001, skipping 0000. So my renaming skips 10000, 20000, and 30000 and the number of images is 33356. I bought this camera used through Dyxum sell/buy forum a couple years ago. So the obvious source of the difference is the count estimate I got from the previous owner. That's where I started numbering. His estimate was off by 240, which is trivial. |
||||
Guy
Senior Member Joined: 29 July 2011 Country: Slovenia Status: Offline Posts: 245 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 18 April 2013 at 00:22 | |||
It is great to see that this actually works!
All SONY alphas (including all NEX photo cameras) are now supported, with the exception of A100 A200 A300 A350 and A700. The tool site also lists the 4 methods that are used to store this information in the makernotes and which camera uses which method. Another interesting observation I have made: The A33/55/35/560/580 cameras and the first NEXes actually store both images taken and full shutter actuations (this number is different since the camera must always do one actuation more if shot in live view - or Manual Focus Live View on 560/580). I suspect this is also the same with the last method (the Tag9050 one), but I have to borrow the 77 from my dad to test that out. If anyone comes across any problems, glitches, or anything else worth noting, let me know! Good tidings to all, Borut |
||||
When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk!
|
||||
> Forum Home > Equipment forums > Camera Talk | Page <12345 15> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.