The E-mount Lineup |
Page <1 15161718> |
Author | |
addy landzaat ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 22 April 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 16215 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Saw that one. Your NEX 6 has (better) phase detect AF then the contrast only NEX 7.
|
|
Why not follow me on Instagram? @Addy_101
|
|
![]() |
|
pegelli ![]() Admin Group ![]() Dyxum Administrator Joined: 02 June 2007 Country: Belgium Location: Schilde Status: Offline Posts: 39041 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And from the review it seemed he used some kind of "wide" AF setting since it focussed on the background rather than the subject. Low light can indeed be a problem but if you use the center spot and put that on the subject it's nearly impossible for the camera/lens to focus on the background. So it's also a question to know your camera and optimise the settings for your specific use case.
I can't test it for you anymore, I gave the lens away to a cousin of my wife after I got the the CZ 55/1.8 but I mainly use that on FF while my NEX6 and A6000 are mainly used with my WA zoom (10-18). |
|
You can see the April Foolishness 2023 exhibition here Another great show of the talent we have on Dyxum
|
|
![]() |
|
der dickgg ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 11 February 2009 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 699 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Very pleased with the three Viltrox lenses I bought a while ago.
56mm f/1.4 23mm f/1.4 13mm f/1.4 Usefull for both video and stills on my NEX-6, NEX-7 and NEX-VG. |
|
Quit a lot of ALPHA and NEX gear, a nice collection of Sigma lenses, Dynax and M42 stuff, Gitzo's, Visico's and lots of video-equipment
|
|
![]() |
|
glefebvre ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 24 August 2009 Country: United States Location: California Status: Offline Posts: 205 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My E-mount lineup isn't very big.
Camera is an A7R. Lenses are: FE 20mm F1.8 G Vario-Tessar T* FE 16–35 mm F4 ZA OSS Sonnar FE 55mm F1.8 ZA FE 24–105 mm F4 G OSS FE 24-240mm F3.5-6.3 OSS |
|
a99m2 a7r a900 a77m2 7D 5D RX100m7 A2 9 7 7xi 9000 XK X700x4 XE-7x2 XD-11 M645 Pro TLx2 & a boat load of lenses.
|
|
![]() |
|
Raabje ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 26 July 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 74 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
hello forum, can I ask a question here about the Sony Zeiss 55mm f/1.8? I see it shows up in a some line ups.
I read here and there the construction is weak, something with the gears inside. Is this true or exaggerated? I just sold some MF lenses and now a used 55mm f/1.8 is getting into reach. I will use it on APS-C and maybe the lens will not fully deliver. If the gears are weak it might not be the best choice. |
|
![]() |
|
glefebvre ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 24 August 2009 Country: United States Location: California Status: Offline Posts: 205 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The FE 55mm F1.8 ZA was the first lens I bought when I bought the A7R. As far as I'm concerned, the build is very good, nice a solid. I haven't had any issues with any of mechanics of the lens. It focuses quickly and quietly on my A7R.
|
|
a99m2 a7r a900 a77m2 7D 5D RX100m7 A2 9 7 7xi 9000 XK X700x4 XE-7x2 XD-11 M645 Pro TLx2 & a boat load of lenses.
|
|
![]() |
|
QuietOC ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 28 February 2015 Country: United States Location: Michigan Status: Offline Posts: 3733 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There are no gears in it, but the linear AF mechanism is glued together and is known to fail. There is an article at Lens Rentals discussing this. The first copy I bought was badly decentered, which may stem from manufacturing that glued connection. Many older Sony FE lenses used similar construction. The plastic gearbox in the cheaper 1.8/50 is likely more robust--I've taken that lens apart, and put it back together. Edited by QuietOC - 18 January 2024 at 22:33 |
|
Sony A7RIV LA-EA5
Pentax Q7 5-15 15-45/2.8 8.5/1.9 11.5/9 |
|
![]() |
|
AudioDoc ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 26 January 2006 Country: United States Location: SLC Utah Status: Offline Posts: 3569 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Anything and everything can break! And nothing is perfect! Don't spend too much time reading those posts online. That can result in too much "brain damage"! ![]() Also if you are buying used, always check here on Dyxum for members selling gear. That's probably safer than buying used else where, unless you have a local camera store that is selling used gear and can guarantee your purchase. In any case I've never heard of the FE 55mm f1.8 ZAA being a "dog"! Of course it is true that Sony has greatly improved manufacturing and design and performance of their newer lens since the 55mm f1.8 was first introduced. |
|
![]() |
|
Raabje ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 26 July 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 74 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Okay, thanks all for the advice. I have seen a used (mint) 55 f/1.8 lens in a camera shop with waranty and a good price. So I think a little bit more about it, might do it to make my transition form A mount to E mount complete (if that ever would be possible, haha...). Edited by Raabje - 19 January 2024 at 07:46 |
|
![]() |
|
addy landzaat ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 22 April 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 16215 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mine works fine, it is really nice on full frame. It probably is as nice on crop (as I said elsewhere I use a Sony 50/1.8 OSS on crop). You will enjoy it! |
|
Why not follow me on Instagram? @Addy_101
|
|
![]() |
|
Raabje ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 26 July 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 74 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
One more question. I think I am gonna stay on APS-C for a long time, no need to go full frame. I see there is a Sigma 56mm f/1.4 too. So how does this lens compare to the Sony Zeiss 55mm f/1.8 for APS-C? A new Sigma has the same price as a used Sony Zeiss.Is there someone with experience with these two?
|
|
![]() |
|
addy landzaat ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 22 April 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 16215 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Sigma 56/1.4 is highly regarded. You might want to read this comparison between the Sigma 56/1.4, Sony 50/1.8 and Sony/Zeiss 55/1.8: https://mirrorlesscomparison.com/e-mount-lenses/sony-e-50mm-f-1-8-vs-sigma-56mm-f-1-4-vs-sony-fe-55mm-f-1-8/
If you're open for third party lenses, the Viltrox 56/1.4 might be an option as well. |
|
Why not follow me on Instagram? @Addy_101
|
|
![]() |
|
Raabje ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 26 July 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 74 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for that review, that was a great read. The Sigma is a no-brainer, but my heart still wants the Zeiss. But I cannot go wrong with either. I can always switch later if I feel the need. |
|
![]() |
|
Raabje ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 26 July 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Posts: 74 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The update is that I just ordered a used Sigma 56mm. When it is delivered in a few days, my line up with Nex-6 will be Sony Zeiss 24mm f/1.8, Samyang 35mm f/2.8 and the Sigma 56mm f/1.4. There is some room for improvement or expansion but I think I have a solid base here. The Sigma 17mm looks interesting.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Page <1 15161718> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.