Odd frame numbering issue - a99 |
Author | ||
owenn01 ![]() Alpha Eyes group ![]() Joined: 20 May 2008 Country: United Kingdom Location: Kent Status: Offline Posts: 11069 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 27 September 2020 at 10:16 |
|
Hi all,
I've just been looking through my most recent images taken a couple of weeks ago whilst on vacation and on importing to LR I noticed the order of the images was, to out it mildly, 'All over the show'. I thought it was an issue with LR but, on closer inspection, it appears it is 'correct' in how it is importing the files but the file numbers themselves seem all over the place and not in the 'correct' order. HAs anyone seen this before? I have been having some odd issues with the card (it's becoming difficult reinserting it into the card slot, though another card is fine) or is it a problem with the software on the camera itself? Any thoughts etc. most welcome as it's rather confusing to see this in action! Thanks and best regards, Neil. |
||
My Mantra: "Comment on other's work as you would wish to have yours commented upon". Go on - it's fun!
|
||
![]() |
||
pegelli ![]() Admin Group ![]() Dyxum Administrator Joined: 02 June 2007 Country: Belgium Location: Schilde Status: Online Posts: 30309 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
That's disturbing Neil.
One way to solve this in lightroom is to sort by capture time (instead of by name), do the files appear in the right order then? How have you set your file numbering, "series" or "reset"? Can it be your numbers hit 9999 and then reset to 0001 and started a new folder? (this happens automatically) If it's just one card giving the problem I would throw it away and get a new one, too much chance of even bigger mishaps (losing files) if there's anything wrong with it. |
||
Mind the bandwidth of others, don't link pictures larger then 1024 wide or 960 pix high, see here
|
||
![]() |
||
owenn01 ![]() Alpha Eyes group ![]() Joined: 20 May 2008 Country: United Kingdom Location: Kent Status: Offline Posts: 11069 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hi Pieter,
No - it's not a 'reset' issue (experienced many of those over the years!); the latest went from an 02xxx to an 06xxx number. Importing into LR should be set to ascending number order (I will go and check!) but this seems random as well - the latest series starts towards the end of the day, goes through to the close of the day then restarts from the morning images! The images in the folder are in the 'correct' time stamp order so I'm not sure what is happening here.... And yes; I think a discarding of the card is called for; it's been through a lot of images (being the card I had when I purchased the camera!). Thanks for the reply and best regards, Neil. |
||
My Mantra: "Comment on other's work as you would wish to have yours commented upon". Go on - it's fun!
|
||
![]() |
||
addy landzaat ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 22 April 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Netherlands Status: Online Posts: 11161 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I do not use Lightroom. but the order "in the folder" (I assume in File Explorer) has nothing to do with the order in a program like Lightroom. These are just settings.
What you describe sounds weird. How are the name files? When you say 02xxx you mean DSC02xxx? Do you use two cards? Or just one? did you try the other card slot? How is your camera set? Series or Reset? What is the set time on your camera? Those were the questions I thought about when I saw your problem. But if another cards means no problems, just get another card. Those are not that expensive ![]() |
||
Why not follow me on Instagram? @Addy_101
|
||
![]() |
||
pegelli ![]() Admin Group ![]() Dyxum Administrator Joined: 02 June 2007 Country: Belgium Location: Schilde Status: Online Posts: 30309 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Neil, you can also set Lightroom to sort by capture time. That would save you renaming all the files.
It's in the library view, the bar just above the film strip at the bottom. If you don't see it click on the little triangle at the right and make sure "sorting" is selected. |
||
Mind the bandwidth of others, don't link pictures larger then 1024 wide or 960 pix high, see here
|
||
![]() |
||
Hezu ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 13 October 2007 Country: Finland Location: HKI/KSNK Status: Online Posts: 2744 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
||
Jozioau ![]() Alpha Eyes group ![]() Joined: 13 May 2007 Country: Australia Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Posts: 6604 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Maybe a dumb question, but has the card been re-formatted using the in-camera menu?
That will erase all traces of old image files and re-set everything. If after re-formatting, the image counters of photos taken are still all over the shop, bin it. |
||
"Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst" - Henri Cartier-Bresson
My FlickrPro site |
||
![]() |
||
Dopol ![]() Alpha Eyes group ![]() Joined: 17 May 2007 Country: Netherlands Location: Amsterdam Status: Online Posts: 7210 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I think it has to do with what Hezu assumes.
The camera looks at the card, finds a highest shot number, and number up from that point on. I had this in the past. I remember it wasn't very logical, because it didn't happen all the time. So I would go with the dumb question of Joe ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
owenn01 ![]() Alpha Eyes group ![]() Joined: 20 May 2008 Country: United Kingdom Location: Kent Status: Offline Posts: 11069 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Thanks all - I'm of the view to 'bin it' as so effectively described by Joe. It's had numerous reformats in camera (each time it's used in fact) and, with the problems of getting it to fit into the card slot (which doesn't occur with other cards I have) then I think it's time for it to go to that happy photographic site in the sky (no; not Flickr....).
best regards, Neil. |
||
My Mantra: "Comment on other's work as you would wish to have yours commented upon". Go on - it's fun!
|
||
![]() |
||
overeema ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 07 September 2008 Country: Netherlands Location: Gelderland Status: Offline Posts: 341 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
This indeed is how the Alpha software is designed (I remember from a course back in 2008). The recommendation is when you insert another card, to always change to a new folder. The camera starts counting from the highest number in the current folder. If that folder is empty it continues from the last shutter release. The foldername xxxMSDCF has a 3-digit number in it, starting from 100. So in total you can have 7 digit unique identifiers before the camera wraps around. When you use the same card alternatingly in multiple bodies, you can still have duplicate names in LR. Nikon seems to have a solution for that: it allows you to change DSC0 in the picturename DSC0xxxx into a unique camerabody identifier. I do these renames manually in postprocessing with a bulk rename utility. After each wrap around I change DSC0 into DSC1, DSC2, DSC3, etc en for my NEX body i use NEX0, NEX1, etc |
||
minolta owner since 1969; A350-SAL1680Z-SAL70300G-Tamron60F2-Minolta100F2-Minolta35105-Minolta28135-Minolta50F1.7; NEX6-SELP1650-SELP18105G (and some minolta MC/MD glass )
|
||
![]() |
||
owenn01 ![]() Alpha Eyes group ![]() Joined: 20 May 2008 Country: United Kingdom Location: Kent Status: Offline Posts: 11069 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Thanks everyone for the advice - I have just purchased a replacement card (so cheap now - even for one with a better spec. than the one I seem to be having problems with. I will return to this post should this not fix the problem!
Best regards, Neil. |
||
My Mantra: "Comment on other's work as you would wish to have yours commented upon". Go on - it's fun!
|
||
![]() |
||
amrep ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 02 February 2015 Country: Norway Status: Offline Posts: 254 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
If pictures are deleted in camera the unoccupied numbers from deleted pictures may be reused causing numbers and created time to be "out of sync".
I don't know if this is relevant to your issue. |
||
![]() |
||
Hezu ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 13 October 2007 Country: Finland Location: HKI/KSNK Status: Online Posts: 2744 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.070 seconds.

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.