maxxum 9xi and infrared film |
Author | |
2manycamera ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 14 November 2005 Location: Cal Motherlode Status: Offline Posts: 1655 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posted: 12 July 2008 at 13:00 |
I'm going on vacation next week and plan to bring 1 film camera in addition to the a700 gear. I'm planning to shoot one of my remaining rolls of kodak HIE B+W Infrared film. My question is: will the motorized advance in the 9xi fog infrared?
I've never used the HIE in this body and would like to avoid unpleasant surprises. I have plenty of other options if someone knows that it will cause a problem. |
|
7D a68 a99 a6600 a7Rii 16/2.8 24/2.8 28/2 35/2 50/1.4 100/2 200/2.8 24-70CZ 1.8/135 80-200/2.8 24-105 28-135 300/4 16-50DT 70-300G Tam 90/2.8, E55-210 E2/12 Sig E1.4/16,30 & 56, FE15/4.5V
|
|
![]() |
|
Grubeater ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 02 June 2006 Country: Netherlands Location: Nijmegen Status: Offline Posts: 1129 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
According to M Hohner's website the 9xi is IR safe. Look here.
|
|
![]() |
|
2manycamera ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 14 November 2005 Location: Cal Motherlode Status: Offline Posts: 1655 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the quick reply. Also, great sight that I was unaware existed. This one will stay bookmarked.
|
|
7D a68 a99 a6600 a7Rii 16/2.8 24/2.8 28/2 35/2 50/1.4 100/2 200/2.8 24-70CZ 1.8/135 80-200/2.8 24-105 28-135 300/4 16-50DT 70-300G Tam 90/2.8, E55-210 E2/12 Sig E1.4/16,30 & 56, FE15/4.5V
|
|
![]() |
|
matthiaspaul ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 08 September 2006 Country: Germany Status: Offline Posts: 940 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As already answered, there won't be problems, since the Dynax 9xi uses an electromechanical film advance sensor, not an IR-LED. However, you may need to stick some adhesive tape on the pressure plate in order to cover the little grooves in there. Otherwise, they may become visible on the film. Also, there was a special IR-safe pressure plate (2081-0814-01) available for the Dynax 9xi from Minolta Service, but they ran out of supply more than ten years ago. http://www.mi-fo.de/forum/index.php?showtopic=18036&view=findpost&p=209035 [de] http://www.mi-fo.de/forum/index.php?showtopic=3907&view=findpost&p=40154 [de] Greetings, Matthias Edited by matthiaspaul - 12 July 2008 at 13:44 |
|
--
Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de |
|
![]() |
|
2manycamera ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 14 November 2005 Location: Cal Motherlode Status: Offline Posts: 1655 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hmmm...
I have 1" wide black gaffer tape. It's certainly opaque and the right size, but what about thickness and changing the focus point of the film plane? Considering there is already the issue of focus with infrared, what will this add to the calculation. Suppose stopping down to F16 makes the most sense, unless some else has tried this. |
|
7D a68 a99 a6600 a7Rii 16/2.8 24/2.8 28/2 35/2 50/1.4 100/2 200/2.8 24-70CZ 1.8/135 80-200/2.8 24-105 28-135 300/4 16-50DT 70-300G Tam 90/2.8, E55-210 E2/12 Sig E1.4/16,30 & 56, FE15/4.5V
|
|
![]() |
|
matthiaspaul ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 08 September 2006 Country: Germany Status: Offline Posts: 940 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm not sure if gaffer tape won't be a bit too adhesive, if you want to remove it afterwards... I can recommend thin self-adhesive foils to cover books, for example "d-c-fix" (Konrad Hornschuch AG, 74679 Weißbach, Germany). http://www.mi-fo.de/forum/index.php?showtopic=18516&view=findpost&p=213038 [de] In regard to the focus point, you do not need to worry, as it won't change, if you insert something between the backside of the film and the pressure plate, as the film will remain in exactly the same position as before. Greetings, Matthias |
|
--
Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de |
|
![]() |
|
2manycamera ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 14 November 2005 Location: Cal Motherlode Status: Offline Posts: 1655 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The gaffer tape that I have (3M) leaves little or no residue behind. I mostly use it for taping gels to hot lights (its intended purpose) as it withstands heat and won't leave your lights looking gross after taking the tape off.
Still, I may try a piece first on an old 3xi that does not AF anymore to try it out before sticking it to my 9xi. You are, of course, correct regarding the film plane. Had I thought about it longer, I'd have come to same conclusion. Thanks for steering me in that direction. |
|
7D a68 a99 a6600 a7Rii 16/2.8 24/2.8 28/2 35/2 50/1.4 100/2 200/2.8 24-70CZ 1.8/135 80-200/2.8 24-105 28-135 300/4 16-50DT 70-300G Tam 90/2.8, E55-210 E2/12 Sig E1.4/16,30 & 56, FE15/4.5V
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.