FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

RRS L-Plate for A900 pics

Page  <1234>
Author
ab012 View Drop Down
Emeritus group
Emeritus group

Joined: 10 September 2005
Country: Australia
Status: Offline
Posts: 2677
Post Options Post Options   Quote ab012 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 January 2009 at 04:20
Thanks RobLynn for lending them your camera!

I want to get one too,...
Bernard

fun fun fun
 



Back to Top
PhotoTraveler View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 30 September 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Posts: 6356
Post Options Post Options   Quote PhotoTraveler Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 January 2009 at 04:47
RSS did what they could on the A700, I can't blame them for very much on it.
Back to Top
matthiaspaul View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 08 September 2006
Country: Germany
Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Post Options Post Options   Quote matthiaspaul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 January 2009 at 23:28
Originally posted by RobArtLyn RobArtLyn wrote:


They only announced it as officially available for pre-order after they got my camera in early December, which they kept for a few weeks. I know that they only did a test fit of the final design last week, because I had to loan my camera to them again to do it. Now they will have to devote production capacity to making a batch.

Looks nice, but IMHO they should improve the design in some easy but useful ways:

Since the bracket will remain semi-permanentely attached, it should provide options to mount handstraps:

Unfortunately, the Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 does not (in contrast to the Minolta Dynax 9) feature a strap eyelet on the bottom side of the fingergrip, rendering it impossible to permanently mount a handstrap on the camera for improved grip and security (a major obstacle for me).

Two (weak) workarounds exist: Utilizing the strap eyelet on the VG-C90AM or using the "after-thought" handstrap Sony STP-GB1AM, mounted into the tripod mount of the camera, a handstrap could be fitted. Both option are not very convenient (compared to the Dynax 9 + VC-9 + HS-1 combo), but at least, they exist. However, given that none of these items can be mounted at the same time as the L-plate, and the plate will typically be mounted semi-permanently, I think, it would be very important, that the L-plate itself provides options to mount a handstrap:

It should either "replace" the mounting plate of the STP-GB1AM, so that this handstrap itself can be attached to the L-plate, or the L-plate's bottom plate should be extended to the right and provide a strap eyelet right below the finger grip, so that the Minolta handstrap HS-1 or other 3rd party handstraps can be mounted there. Of course the battery opening must remain uncovered.

Further, I would like to see some kind of strut or eyelet in the lower left corner of the plate in order to optionally mount a handstrap, either for left-handers between the left eyelet of the body and this suggested eyelet on the L-plate, or for portraiture work (without tripod) between the two suggested eyelets on the L-plate itself.

Two further suggestions:

Does the L-plate's bottom plate already feature a pin going into that little groove in the DSLR-A900s bottom? That would add some extra stability...

Maybe they could somehow add a spirit level to the top of the left arm of the L-plate?

Greetings,

Matthias

Edited by matthiaspaul - 20 January 2009 at 11:09
--

Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de
Back to Top
RobArtLyn View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 07 October 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Posts: 474
Post Options Post Options   Quote RobArtLyn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 January 2009 at 02:24
Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

Since the bracket will remain semi-permanentely attached

For some people. Some of us only mount it when needed. However...

Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

it should provide options to mount handstraps:

It already does.

Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

It should either "replace" the mounting plate of the STP-GB1AM, so that this handstrap itself can be attached to the L-plate

That's the way that it was designed.

Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

or the L-plate's bottom plate should be extended to the right and provide a strap eyelet right below the finger grip, so that the Minolta handstrap HS-1 or other 3rd party handstraps can be mounted there. Of course the battery opening must remain uncovered.

Of course... that would be a largely impossible thing to do, without making the plate too large and complicated. Way too many people would complain about the design if that happened.

Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

Does the L-plate's bottom plate already feature a pin going into that little groove in the DSLR-A900s bottom? That would add some extra stability...

I have my A900 here. There are no grooves on the bottom. There is a small, circular indentation. I assume that is what you are talking about. No, there isn't a pin on the plate, but it is not necessary. Like the rest of their plates, it follows the contour of the camera in front and back. The design is inherently anti-twist and very stable.

Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

Maybe they could somehow add a spirit level to the top of the left arm of the L-plate?

They put spirit levels (optionally) in the clamps on the ballhead, where it works with the camera horizontal or vertical.

By the way, I have one sitting here as I type this. It came in the box when they returned my camera today. I am seriously disappointed with one aspect of the design. I specifically loaned both my remote shutter release and the USB cable that came with the A900 to RRS so they could accommodate both connections in their design so that people who shoot tethered, as I do sometimes, could use the camera mounted vertically. They left a notch in the plate to allow sufficient clearance for the door over the USB & HDMI ports to be opened & closed with the plate mounted, but the strain relief portion of the USB cable extends too far and does not clear the plate. It is impossible to mount the camera vertically* on the ballhead clamp with the USB cable attached. I find this particularly frustrating because this was one of the primary reasons why I went to the trouble of loaning my camera to them. The A700 plate has the same deficiency, which I complained about at the time, because the person who loaned them their A700 didn't include the USB cable so that they could design the plate to accommodate it.

* It's not completely impossible. It can be done with a Kirk LBA-1 spacer block, which I already have to use with the A700 L-plate.

Kirk LBA-1
Also available directly from Kirk Enterprises

Edited by RobArtLyn - 20 January 2009 at 02:27
My Portfolio

A700+VG-C70AM A900+VG-C90AM
24-70/2.8ZA 80-200/2.8HS(G) 85/1.4G(D) 100/2.0 100/2.8(D) Macro 300/4(G)
Back to Top
PhotoTraveler View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 30 September 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Posts: 6356
Post Options Post Options   Quote PhotoTraveler Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 January 2009 at 03:49
Yes, that will continue to be a problem, and really goes back to the camera maker.

I think they were on the right path with the A100 when they put the remote port on the back. The 7D has the USB port out the other side with the CF door, that would help too.
Back to Top
Octupi View Drop Down
Emeritus group
Emeritus group
Knowledge Base Contributor

Joined: 28 August 2007
Country: United States
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Posts: 5601
Post Options Post Options   Quote Octupi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 January 2009 at 05:29
You could drill a small hole in the remote door. Place a cord through it, leaving say, 1/2" w/ a knot on the end stick through to pull, and glue in place from the back side of it (hot glue comes to mind). Extreme, I know, but if you leave the bracket on all the time, it would work and be quite easy to do.
 



Back to Top
RobArtLyn View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 07 October 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Posts: 474
Post Options Post Options   Quote RobArtLyn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 January 2009 at 08:01
Originally posted by PhotoTraveler PhotoTraveler wrote:

Yes, that will continue to be a problem, and really goes back to the camera maker.

It's a solvable problem, if they make the effort. A lot of the current Kirk plates allow for tethered shooting without the spacer block. Of course, they refuse to design one for the A700 or A900 because they were foolish enough to expect a lot of sales for the A100 L-plate.

RRS just screwed up. They put the notch in so that the door can be opened and closed, but you can't use it with just their products. It would be one thing if they offered their own spacer block, but they don't even do that.
My Portfolio

A700+VG-C70AM A900+VG-C90AM
24-70/2.8ZA 80-200/2.8HS(G) 85/1.4G(D) 100/2.0 100/2.8(D) Macro 300/4(G)
Back to Top
PhotoTraveler View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 30 September 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Posts: 6356
Post Options Post Options   Quote PhotoTraveler Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 January 2009 at 08:14
I guess I'm just use to using the 7D where I had to have it clamped off to the side when the release was in there.

It's a balance, I could use it like that, and it meant the bracket wasn't overly big.
Back to Top
SeattleDucks View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie

Joined: 20 January 2009
Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Post Options Post Options   Quote SeattleDucks Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 January 2009 at 08:39
Well, it may not be perfect but I am very glad RRS decided to make an L-Plate for the A900, unlike Kirk who is completely ignoring this camera. It's difficult to design a single plate without compromise for some users (myself, I never use the USB and HDMI ports and would prefer the bracket to fit snug against the side of the body for maximum vibration damping).

For those looking for another handstrap alternative, Markins offers one in black or brown leather that attaches to RRS' built-in strap lug.



Edited by SeattleDucks - 20 January 2009 at 08:42
Back to Top
matthiaspaul View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 08 September 2006
Country: Germany
Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Post Options Post Options   Quote matthiaspaul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 January 2009 at 11:51
Originally posted by RobArtLyn RobArtLyn wrote:


Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:


Since the bracket will remain semi-permanentely attached

For some people. Some of us only mount it when needed. However...

Well, I was assuming the L-plate's mounting screw does not feature some kind of knob, so that a hex key or such is required to fasten it?
Originally posted by RobArtLyn RobArtLyn wrote:


Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

It should either "replace" the mounting plate of the STP-GB1AM, so that this handstrap itself can be attached to the L-plate

That's the way that it was designed.

That's great news for me (I'm not familiar with RRS items) and I can now see it on one of the photos. (I wished, however, a similar provision would also exist on the left side of the plate just to have more mounting options.)

Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

Does the L-plate's bottom plate already feature a pin going into that little groove in the DSLR-A900s bottom? That would add some extra stability...

I have my A900 here. There are no grooves on the bottom. There is a small, circular indentation. I assume that is what you are talking about.

Yes, exactly.

No, there isn't a pin on the plate, but it is not necessary. Like the rest of their plates, it follows the contour of the camera in front and back. The design is inherently anti-twist and very stable.

But couldn't it be slightly "off-mounted" by, say, a millimeter, whereas a "centering" or "registering" pin could avoid that completely? After all, that's what this indentation is for to the best of my knowledge...

Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

Maybe they could somehow add a spirit level to the top of the left arm of the L-plate?

They put spirit levels (optionally) in the clamps on the ballhead, where it works with the camera horizontal or vertical.

I see.

They left a notch in the plate to allow sufficient clearance for the door over the USB & HDMI ports to be opened & closed with the plate mounted, but the strain relief portion of the USB cable extends too far and does not clear the plate.

Did you talk back to them already?

In either case, thanks for your efforts and your helpful report.

Greetings,

Matthias
--

Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de
Back to Top
RobArtLyn View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 07 October 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Posts: 474
Post Options Post Options   Quote RobArtLyn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 January 2009 at 13:58
Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

Well, I was assuming the L-plate's mounting screw does not feature some kind of knob, so that a hex key or such is required to fasten it?

Yes. I just carry the tool in my case. It takes up the least amount of room of any accessory that I carry.

Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

But couldn't it be slightly "off-mounted" by, say, a millimeter, whereas a "centering" or "registering" pin could avoid that completely? After all, that's what this indentation is for to the best of my knowledge...

No, it follows the front and rear contours of the camera. When it is screwed tight, it doesn't move at all.

Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

Did you talk back to them already?

Not yet. I haven't decided whether to call or send an email with photos attached, which I won't have time to do until tomorrow.
My Portfolio

A700+VG-C70AM A900+VG-C90AM
24-70/2.8ZA 80-200/2.8HS(G) 85/1.4G(D) 100/2.0 100/2.8(D) Macro 300/4(G)
Back to Top
matthiaspaul View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 08 September 2006
Country: Germany
Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Post Options Post Options   Quote matthiaspaul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 January 2009 at 15:42
Originally posted by revdocjim revdocjim wrote:

I just looked at it on the RRS website. Not much room to grind...
A really slick solution would be to create a tiny tool shaped like a small minus screwdriver to use when opening flaps. Then create a tiny hole in the bracket where it is stored, like how pointer devices fit into a Palm.

Nice idea! Maybe the hex key (that supposedly comes with the L-plate?) could be used for this purpose and stored right inside the L-plate itself somehow (perhaps following the "L" shape), so you don't have to search for it, when you need it.
Originally posted by RobArtLyn RobArtLyn wrote:


Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

Does the L-plate's bottom plate already feature a pin going into that little groove in the DSLR-A900s bottom? That would add some extra stability...

No, there isn't a pin on the plate, but it is not necessary. Like the rest of their plates, it follows the contour of the camera in front and back. The design is inherently anti-twist and very stable.

Still, I would prefer to have such a pin for perfect parallel alignment of the camera with the base plate and to maintain maximum stability with heavier lenses in vertical position. Somewhere up in this thread you wrote, that you would have come into the habit of loosening the screw in order to slightly move the L-plate and open the flaps on the left side (of the A700). From this I deduct, that alignment may not always be 100% perfect with heavy lenses or if the screw becomes slightly loose.
Originally posted by RobArtLyn RobArtLyn wrote:


I am seriously disappointed with one aspect of the design. I specifically loaned both my remote shutter release and the USB cable that came with the A900 to RRS so they could accommodate both connections in their design so that people who shoot tethered, as I do sometimes, could use the camera mounted vertically. They left a notch in the plate to allow sufficient clearance for the door over the USB & HDMI ports to be opened & closed with the plate mounted, but the strain relief portion of the USB cable extends too far and does not clear the plate. It is impossible to mount the camera vertically* on the ballhead clamp with the USB cable attached. I find this particularly frustrating because this was one of the primary reasons why I went to the trouble of loaning my camera to them.

I see the problem. Hm, maybe, as an attempt to remedy the problem (if it cannot be solved by RRS in the first place by trying to further improve the design), you could try to find a 3rd party USB 2.0 Hi-Speed cable featuring an angled plug - does Sony use a proprietary USB connector or do they use a standard mini (or micro?) USB connector?

Yet one more question in regard to RRS' "BA900-L": The Kirk plates seem to come with a standard tripod mounting hole on the bottom side of the plate, is this the case with the RRS BA900-L plate as well? I know, it may sound a bit odd to request this given that the main purpose of the L-plate is to attach the camera to an Arca-Swiss compatible head, but for those, who would keep the L-plate permanently attached, the availability of a "standard" tripod hole may be very useful for other mounting purposes in the field.

Greetings,

Matthias
--

Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de
Back to Top
RobArtLyn View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 07 October 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Posts: 474
Post Options Post Options   Quote RobArtLyn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 January 2009 at 00:30
Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

Still, I would prefer to have such a pin for perfect parallel alignment of the camera with the base plate and to maintain maximum stability with heavier lenses in vertical position.

It is completely unnecessary, just as it is unnecessary for the plates that fit cameras that don't have a depression that such a pin could fit. The plate is designed to grip the front and rear edges of the bottom of the camera along the length of the plate. It is specifically designed that way to provide an anti-twist function. No matter how heavy your lens, the plate will not move/rotate at all relative to the camera.

Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

Somewhere up in this thread you wrote, that you would have come into the habit of loosening the screw in order to slightly move the L-plate and open the flaps on the left side (of the A700). From this I deduct, that alignment may not always be 100% perfect with heavy lenses or if the screw becomes slightly loose.

This is a different matter. The mounting screw for the A700 plate sits in a long slot that runs along part of the length of the bottom of the plate. This allows the plate to be mounted anywhere along the length of the slot, so that the plate can be snug against the left of the camera or sit farther out. I would simply take advantage of this as a way to get better access to the door without removing the plate entirely. However, no matter where you put the plate, once the screw is tight, it isn't going anywhere. The A900 plate does not have such a slot. The screw fits a hole and the plate can only be mounted at one spot along the length of the camera.

For either the A700 or A900 plate, by the time that the screw would be loose enough for the front/rear contours to no longer effectively prevent twisting, the entire camera would be loose enough to rattle and rock in the plate, even without the weight of a lens, so you would no longer have a solid support. Twisting would be the least of the problems.

Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

I see the problem. Hm, maybe, as an attempt to remedy the problem (if it cannot be solved by RRS in the first place by trying to further improve the design), you could try to find a 3rd party USB 2.0 Hi-Speed cable featuring an angled plug - does Sony use a proprietary USB connector or do they use a standard mini (or micro?) USB connector?

It uses a standard, but rare outside the camera world, micro USB plug. I have never seen a right angle version of such a connector. All they had to do was make the left side of the plate a little deeper to clear the strain relief portion of the cable and put a second notch in like they did for the shutter release.

Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

Yet one more question in regard to RRS' "BA900-L": The Kirk plates seem to come with a standard tripod mounting hole on the bottom side of the plate, is this the case with the RRS BA900-L plate as well?

Yes. The bottom of the plate is tapped with a standard 1/4x20 threaded mounting point.

Edited by RobArtLyn - 23 January 2009 at 00:33
My Portfolio

A700+VG-C70AM A900+VG-C90AM
24-70/2.8ZA 80-200/2.8HS(G) 85/1.4G(D) 100/2.0 100/2.8(D) Macro 300/4(G)
Back to Top
matthiaspaul View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 08 September 2006
Country: Germany
Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Post Options Post Options   Quote matthiaspaul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 January 2009 at 11:21
Thanks for your explanation, Robert.
Originally posted by RobArtLyn RobArtLyn wrote:


Originally posted by matthiaspaul matthiaspaul wrote:

Hm, maybe, as an attempt to remedy the problem (if it cannot be solved by RRS in the first place by trying to further improve the design), you could try to find a 3rd party USB 2.0 Hi-Speed cable featuring an angled plug - does Sony use a proprietary USB connector or do they use a standard mini (or micro?) USB connector?

It uses a standard, but rare outside the camera world, micro USB plug. I have never seen a right angle version of such a connector.

I have not, either, but somewhere they ought to exist. ;-)

In either case, from close inspection of a macro shot of the DSLR-A900's left side, it seems, the USB connector used by Sony is actually an 8 pin connector. It looks a bit like a micro-B USB connector, but the standard micro-B USB connector has 5 pins only. Since it is not even labelled "USB" on the flap, I guess, it's (once more) a Sony proprietary connector combining USB 2.0 Hi-Speed and Composite Video in one... #-|

EDIT: The Konica Minolta 7D, 5D / Sweet D, Sony DSLR-A100, DSLR-A200, DSLR-A300, DSLR-A350, DSLR-A700 and DSLR-A900 all use the same proprietary combo connector. So, actually, it is Konica Minolta who is to blame for introducing non-standard connectors. However, the micro USB standard did not exist in 2004 when the 7D was introduced, but Sony should have adopted the standard, when it became available, at least they should in the future. FWIW, the pinout of the connector is as follows:

http://www.mi-fo.de/forum/index.php?showtopic=22787
/---+
| 1 | GND (Wired to #6 in camera)
| 2 | (Out) Composite Video (CVBS/FBAS)
| 3 | (Out) Audio (Reserved / Not currently used)
| 4 | (In) AV Cable Detect (Wired to #1 in cable)
| 5 | (In/Out) USB 2.0 Data+ (Full-Speed or Hi-Speed depending on camera)
| 6 | GND (Wired to #1 in camera)
| 7 | (In/Out) USB 2.0 Data- (Full-Speed or Hi-Speed depending on camera)
| 8 | (In) USB Cable & Host Detect (Wired to +5.0V VUSB Host Power in cable)
\---+ Cable Shield

So, it seems, RRS has the job to really do their stuff right in the first place... Did you hear back from them already?

Yes. The bottom of the plate is tapped with a standard 1/4x20 threaded mounting point.

Great, thanks.

Greetings,

Matthias

Edited by matthiaspaul - 04 February 2009 at 12:23
--

Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de
Back to Top
Dyxum main page >  Forum Home > Equipment forums > Camera Talk > A-mount full frame Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.

Monitor calibration strip

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer

In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania

Feel free to contact us if needed.