FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

TP: Minolta glass list - what to buy and pay

Page  <12
Author
Dave18 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 21 September 2008
Country: United Kingdom
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Posts: 681
Post Options Post Options   Quote Dave18 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 December 2008 at 18:21
At the budget prime end I went for a super takumar 50 /1.4 M42 about L35 in total, manual focus but a great lens for the money

Dave
Sony A7RII, A900, A99 x2, A77II, A580, A200, ZA 135 1.8,tam 28-75 2.8, sig 35 art Tokina 11-16mm, Sigma 70-200 2.8 HSM OS, sony 16-50 2.8 ssm http://www.cornwall-wedding-photographer.co.uk
 



Back to Top
Pupator View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 25 November 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Posts: 173
Post Options Post Options   Quote Pupator Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 January 2009 at 19:58
The $100 you'd spend on this "default" lens would be better used in the purchase of a TAMRON SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II LD You'd have better light response throughout the focal range and superior IQ, also. The only thing you'll hurt with the 18-70 is your photographic output. Is that really where you want your money wasted?


Absolutely. The TAMRON SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di-II LD should be in every Sony user's bag. Incredible lens at a reasonable price, even for a new version ($400).
Back to Top
janders1957 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 18 May 2011
Country: Australia
Location: Cootamundra
Status: Offline
Posts: 228
Post Options Post Options   Quote janders1957 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 October 2011 at 19:17
Originally posted by polossatik polossatik wrote:

Might be a idea to add to the list links to the dyxum lensdatabase and to Dcap's price site for primes: http://www.maxxumeyes.com/UsedPrices.htm ...


I just tried this site and got a popup congratulating me on being "the October 13th Winner" and presenting an OK button to continue with 'claiming my prize'. Don't recall the domain that showed up but it's not the maxxumeyes.com domain. I suspect somewhere in the past couple years the site has been hacked with a redirect.
Not worth it to me to continue and risk picking up something nasty, just thought I'd post a caution to anyone going back through this thread.

edit: www.maxxumeyes.com redirects to testbegin.com

Edited by janders1957 - 13 October 2011 at 19:24
Jon
A700, A500IR, 18-55, 24-105, 28-85, 35-70, 50 1.7, 55-200, 70-210, 100-200, ProSpec 70-300, 800mm SolidCat, assorted MD/M42 glass.
Back to Top
Bob Maddison View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 28 April 2011
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Dorset
Status: Offline
Posts: 1102
Post Options Post Options   Quote Bob Maddison Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 October 2011 at 19:33
First rule about buying lenses is that you can't say what you want as lens #2 until you have bought and used lens #1. And you can't think about lens #3 until you are fully conversant with both #1 and #2. etc. etc. Each lens should compliment the others in your portfolio. However,one factor influencing your choice is simply availability.

I use a SONY 18 - 250 most often. It mightn't be perfect, but it covers almost every situation except macro. Which is why my second most used lens is the Cosina / Vivitar 100mm f3.5 macro. Much criticised - but it works! For technical choice, I would use my Sigma 170 - 500 more often, but it is its weight and size that deter me whereas the 18 - 250 does cover most things I would want to use it for.
Back to Top
EarthQuake View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 23 July 2011
Location: Iowa City, IA
Status: Offline
Posts: 886
Post Options Post Options   Quote EarthQuake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 October 2011 at 21:02
These may be risky on SLT, but seem to work great on Sony SLRs.

Sigma/Quantaray 24mm 2.8 $50-100 - Super sharp, but loud AF
Sigma 28mm 1.8 older version $100-200 - harder to find in A mount.
Sigma/Quantaray 50mm 2.8 macro old version $50-150 - Super sharp again


Also
Minlota 24mm 2.8 - $150-200

I second the 100mm/3.5 as well, I've bought 3 of these in 3 different mounts(Sony, Canon, Nikon) for less than $70 each.
Back to Top
Rno. View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 05 May 2006
Country: United States
Location: Utah
Status: Offline
Posts: 1791
Post Options Post Options   Quote Rno. Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 October 2011 at 17:06
NECRO ALERT! Since 2007, things have changed, so I wonder if there is even a spec of reality left in these prices.

For a more current pricing idea, I suggest Kurt Munger's site here.
Ungeeking
 



Back to Top
Blame View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 14 October 2010
Country: United Kingdom
Location: London UK
Status: Offline
Posts: 2626
Post Options Post Options   Quote Blame Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 October 2011 at 08:50

"KM 70-210 f4 (beercan) $150-225: The legend, sharp at all apertures / zoom, nice bokeh, good macro, heavy and built like a tank, slow AF. A must have lens."

Well I had one and sold it on ebay fast as I could.

Maybe I had a duff copy but wide open at 210mm I could not describe it as sharp. My pentacon 200/4 showed it up badly.
A900, Min 24-105, 35-105, Samyang 14/2.8, 35/1.4, Sig 70/2.8 Macro, ISCO Ultra 125/2, Tam 180/3.5 Macro, Sig 400/5.6 TeleMacro
Back to Top
snajper View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 05 November 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Posts: 446
Post Options Post Options   Quote snajper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 October 2011 at 13:26
I second Sigma 24mm F2.8. Amazing sharpness @f4 and would add sigma 90mm F2.8 macro... for under $200.
90mm f2.8 in 7th sharpest lens for sony mount and I have no doubts
24mm is 11th according to photodo
A580 + too many lenses
Back to Top
ddoctor View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie

Joined: 06 May 2010
Country: Indonesia
Location: Indonesia
Status: Offline
Posts: 101
Post Options Post Options   Quote ddoctor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 October 2011 at 13:39
These are some minolta glass that impressed me, and got more value for money too.

Minolta 50 1.4 around $150-170
Minolta 20mm f2.8 around $300
Minolta 135mm f2.8 around $300
Minolta 80-200 APO black around $500
minolta 28-135 f4-4.5 around $250

Edited by ddoctor - 22 October 2011 at 13:42
Back to Top
Jocelynne View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 17 June 2009
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Posts: 2819
Post Options Post Options   Quote Jocelynne Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 October 2011 at 15:08
An EXCELLENT CONTRIBUTION to Dyxum knowledge. I suffer from incurable lens lust.    And you have decreased my agony.   

Edited by Jocelynne - 22 October 2011 at 15:25
Maxxum 450si, Sony A300, A700, A900 and a cubic meter of Alpha lenses
Back to Top
dannymatronic View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie

Joined: 11 October 2011
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Yorkshire
Status: Offline
Posts: 32
Post Options Post Options   Quote dannymatronic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 November 2011 at 12:23
Bit harsh on the 35-70 f4 I reckon - the weird range just means less demand and very cheap prices. I purchased an excellent copy for L20 and have it on my A200 most of time. Admittedly, zooming with my feet gets a bit tiring after a while!

I'd also like a add a vote for the 35-200xi powerzoom. Decent range, great colours and built like a tank - best of the xi lenses by a mile, and can be had for around L90 if you can find one.

Back to Top
Dyxum main page >  Forum Home > Dyxum Community > Knowledge Base Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.

Monitor calibration strip

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer

In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania

Feel free to contact us if needed.