FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Ultraviolet Light Photography

Page  <12
Author
kerrath View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 07 July 2012
Country: United States
Location: LowerCalifornia
Status: Offline
Posts: 1672
Post Options Post Options   Quote kerrath Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2015 at 23:16
Originally posted by Idyllic Pics Idyllic Pics wrote:

I am interested in this style of photography. Can you suggest search terms to use to learn more about which lenses lend themselves to the process?

I can look specifically for the ones listed above, but is there more info on what to look for in terms of coatings or lens elements?

Thanks!
Over on Ultravioletphotography.com they have compiled a list of lenses which have been tested and found adequate for reflected UV photography. There are some variations among lenses which can make it hard to find a good UV copy at times, but it is a starting point. There are other threads on the same site which go into greater detail on a number of the lenses.

The UV Sticky #2: UV-Capable Lenses 2014
 



Back to Top
Alex H View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Knowledgebase Contributor

Joined: 06 November 2008
Country: Sweden
Location: Stockholm
Status: Offline
Posts: 1591
Post Options Post Options   Quote Alex H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2015 at 23:56
Exactly what Craig said.

Also, check their "Introduce yourself" section - there are few Australian members on that forum, although none from Melbourne, as far as I know.
Back to Top
Idyllic Pics View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 07 May 2014
Country: Australia
Location: Melbourne
Status: Offline
Posts: 415
Post Options Post Options   Quote Idyllic Pics Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 January 2015 at 00:23
Brilliant, kerrath and Alex, thank you.

PS - to clarify ( I think I posted in wrong thread!!) I wish to do the fluorescence stuff. Would those UV capable lenses be better for that?

Back to Top
thornburg View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 25 July 2013
Country: United States
Location: PA
Status: Offline
Posts: 3765
Post Options Post Options   Quote thornburg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 January 2015 at 00:58
I'm wondering... if one has a supposed UV light source, but no UV camera, is there an easy way to check whether it's truly UV or not?
Sony a3000, a6000, a57, a99 - Sony E 16-50, 28/2 | Vivitar 13, 85 | Minolta 24, 28-105, 35-105, 50/1.7, 75-300 | Tokina 28-70/2.6-2.8 | Sigma 70/2.8 Macro | Tamron 70-200/2.8 | Celestron 1000/11
Back to Top
Akunde View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 25 March 2010
Country: Australia
Location: Brisbane
Status: Offline
Posts: 480
Post Options Post Options   Quote Akunde Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 January 2015 at 01:12
Originally posted by Idyllic Pics Idyllic Pics wrote:

Brilliant, kerrath and Alex, thank you.

PS - to clarify ( I think I posted in wrong thread!!) I wish to do the fluorescence stuff. Would those UV capable lenses be better for that?

I've had a bit of a look into the fluorescence space recently, and my understanding the that any lens will do, as your capturing the visible spectrum light given off by a reaction to the UV light source, not the UV itself.

Originally posted by thornburg thornburg wrote:


I'm wondering... if one has a supposed UV light source, but no UV camera, is there an easy way to check whether it's truly UV or not?


Point the UV light at a surface in a well used kitchen or bathroom. All of the bacteria and dust will light up It's an eye opener.



Edited by Akunde - 16 January 2015 at 01:15
A7r+VG, A900+VG, A700+VG & 70-400mm G, CZ 24-70mm, 10-20mm & 100mm Macro
Back to Top
Jocelynne View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 17 June 2009
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Posts: 2819
Post Options Post Options   Quote Jocelynne Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 January 2015 at 01:28
Many thanks for this excellent and informative thread/essay.

I have been interested in IR and UV photography for years. Obtaining IR filters and lenses is relatively easy and inexpensive. However, obtaining IR opticals has proven to be difficult.

Consequently, I am pleased that the A700 is usable for UV work. I have this camera body. Now to find appropriate lenses. I will try Tamron.

Thanks again.

Only on Dyxum...
Maxxum 450si, Sony A300, A700, A900 and a cubic meter of Alpha lenses
 



Back to Top
Alex H View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Knowledgebase Contributor

Joined: 06 November 2008
Country: Sweden
Location: Stockholm
Status: Offline
Posts: 1591
Post Options Post Options   Quote Alex H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 January 2015 at 02:27
Originally posted by Jocelynne Jocelynne wrote:

Many thanks for this excellent and informative thread/essay.

I have been interested in IR and UV photography for years. Obtaining IR filters and lenses is relatively easy and inexpensive. However, obtaining IR opticals has proven to be difficult.

Consequently, I am pleased that the A700 is usable for UV work. I have this camera body. Now to find appropriate lenses. I will try Tamron.

Thanks again.

Only on Dyxum...


Is your A700 unmodified? The exposures with unmodified camera will be very long. Regarding UV-lenses - there are few good lenses that are still affordable in 35mm and 50mm focal length.
Back to Top
kerrath View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 07 July 2012
Country: United States
Location: LowerCalifornia
Status: Offline
Posts: 1672
Post Options Post Options   Quote kerrath Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 January 2015 at 05:57
Originally posted by Idyllic Pics Idyllic Pics wrote:

Brilliant, kerrath and Alex, thank you.

PS - to clarify ( I think I posted in wrong thread!!) I wish to do the fluorescence stuff. Would those UV capable lenses be better for that?

The fluorescence stuff is Ultraviolet-Induced Visible Fluorescence (UVIVF), meaning the UV is responsible for making the materials fluoresce to emit visible light. The UV light itself is not photographed, and is in fact blocked. Check out Alex's site where he has compiled information on UVIVF photography. His post holds most of the information you need to get started. You also might take a look at page three of the Luminous Flowers thread (based on Alex's original thread but for anyone to post) where there is some discussion about UVIVF vs reflected UV and what lenses to use.

This thread covers Reflected UV photography, in which you photograph the ultraviolet light bouncing off your subject, rather than visible light emitted by it. In this case, you are blocking visible light, but passing UV. This is the type for which you need dedicated lenses and a modified camera (so as to not block UV) to have reasonable exposure times.

Edited by kerrath - 16 January 2015 at 06:12
Back to Top
Idyllic Pics View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 07 May 2014
Country: Australia
Location: Melbourne
Status: Offline
Posts: 415
Post Options Post Options   Quote Idyllic Pics Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 January 2015 at 06:09
Thankyou, Kerrath, that has cleared up an obvious confusion. Much appreciated.
Back to Top
Alex H View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Knowledgebase Contributor

Joined: 06 November 2008
Country: Sweden
Location: Stockholm
Status: Offline
Posts: 1591
Post Options Post Options   Quote Alex H Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 January 2015 at 15:03
Thanks Craig, you explained the differences very well.
Back to Top
Dyxum main page >  Forum Home > Dyxum Community > Knowledge Base Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.

Monitor calibration strip

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer

In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania

Feel free to contact us if needed.