Ultraviolet Light Photography |
Page <12 |
Author | ||
kerrath
Senior Member Joined: 07 July 2012 Country: United States Location: LowerCalifornia Status: Offline Posts: 1672 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 15 January 2015 at 23:16 | |
The UV Sticky #2: UV-Capable Lenses 2014 |
||
Alex H
Senior Member Knowledgebase Contributor Joined: 06 November 2008 Country: Sweden Location: Stockholm Status: Offline Posts: 1591 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 15 January 2015 at 23:56 | |
Exactly what Craig said.
Also, check their "Introduce yourself" section - there are few Australian members on that forum, although none from Melbourne, as far as I know. |
||
Ultraviolet-induced visible fluorescence photography - A7, A77, NEX6, NEX6-FS - Gallery
|
||
Idyllic Pics
Senior Member Joined: 07 May 2014 Country: Australia Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Posts: 415 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 16 January 2015 at 00:23 | |
Brilliant, kerrath and Alex, thank you.
PS - to clarify ( I think I posted in wrong thread!!) I wish to do the fluorescence stuff. Would those UV capable lenses be better for that? |
||
thornburg
Senior Member Joined: 25 July 2013 Country: United States Location: PA Status: Offline Posts: 3765 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 16 January 2015 at 00:58 | |
I'm wondering... if one has a supposed UV light source, but no UV camera, is there an easy way to check whether it's truly UV or not?
|
||
Sony a3000, a6000, a57, a99 - Sony E 16-50, 28/2 | Vivitar 13, 85 | Minolta 24, 28-105, 35-105, 50/1.7, 75-300 | Tokina 28-70/2.6-2.8 | Sigma 70/2.8 Macro | Tamron 70-200/2.8 | Celestron 1000/11
|
||
Akunde
Senior Member Joined: 25 March 2010 Country: Australia Location: Brisbane Status: Offline Posts: 480 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 16 January 2015 at 01:12 | |
I've had a bit of a look into the fluorescence space recently, and my understanding the that any lens will do, as your capturing the visible spectrum light given off by a reaction to the UV light source, not the UV itself.
Point the UV light at a surface in a well used kitchen or bathroom. All of the bacteria and dust will light up It's an eye opener. Edited by Akunde - 16 January 2015 at 01:15 |
||
A7r+VG, A900+VG, A700+VG & 70-400mm G, CZ 24-70mm, 10-20mm & 100mm Macro
|
||
Jocelynne
Senior Member Joined: 17 June 2009 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 2819 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 16 January 2015 at 01:28 | |
Many thanks for this excellent and informative thread/essay.
I have been interested in IR and UV photography for years. Obtaining IR filters and lenses is relatively easy and inexpensive. However, obtaining IR opticals has proven to be difficult. Consequently, I am pleased that the A700 is usable for UV work. I have this camera body. Now to find appropriate lenses. I will try Tamron. Thanks again. Only on Dyxum... |
||
Maxxum 450si, Sony A300, A700, A900 and a cubic meter of Alpha lenses
|
||
Alex H
Senior Member Knowledgebase Contributor Joined: 06 November 2008 Country: Sweden Location: Stockholm Status: Offline Posts: 1591 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 16 January 2015 at 02:27 | |
Is your A700 unmodified? The exposures with unmodified camera will be very long. Regarding UV-lenses - there are few good lenses that are still affordable in 35mm and 50mm focal length. |
||
Ultraviolet-induced visible fluorescence photography - A7, A77, NEX6, NEX6-FS - Gallery
|
||
kerrath
Senior Member Joined: 07 July 2012 Country: United States Location: LowerCalifornia Status: Offline Posts: 1672 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 16 January 2015 at 05:57 | |
This thread covers Reflected UV photography, in which you photograph the ultraviolet light bouncing off your subject, rather than visible light emitted by it. In this case, you are blocking visible light, but passing UV. This is the type for which you need dedicated lenses and a modified camera (so as to not block UV) to have reasonable exposure times. Edited by kerrath - 16 January 2015 at 06:12 |
||
Idyllic Pics
Senior Member Joined: 07 May 2014 Country: Australia Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Posts: 415 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 16 January 2015 at 06:09 | |
Thankyou, Kerrath, that has cleared up an obvious confusion. Much appreciated.
|
||
Alex H
Senior Member Knowledgebase Contributor Joined: 06 November 2008 Country: Sweden Location: Stockholm Status: Offline Posts: 1591 |
Post Options Quote Reply Posted: 16 January 2015 at 15:03 | |
Thanks Craig, you explained the differences very well.
|
||
Ultraviolet-induced visible fluorescence photography - A7, A77, NEX6, NEX6-FS - Gallery
|
||
> Forum Home > Dyxum Community > Knowledge Base | Page <12 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.
Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.