FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedUPDATE: New Sony Alpha Pictures!

Page  <12345 39>
Author
I Inspiron View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 03 January 2008
Location: Austria
Status: Offline
Posts: 2871
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 12:12
Originally posted by Explorer45 Explorer45 wrote:

Personally I'm one of those who don't want to see the A700 replacement with an FF sensor. This would mean that the 200mm end of the 70-200/2,8 beeing to short for me. The pros with FF does not compensate for the fact that I loose the tele end.


That's true, but you would gain the true f2.8 again. You would need a 50-150/1.9 lens to get the same focal lengths and minimum DoF on an APS-C camera as you have with a 70-200/2.8 on a FF-camera. With an FF-camera the Minolta 28-135/4-4.5 would have about the same minimum DoF as an APS-C camera with a Tamron 17-50/2.8

Of course this boils down to DoF vs. longer focal length and because of the fact I would keep my A700 a FF-camera would complement it perfectly
Chris
 



Back to Top
ricardovaste View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 08 August 2007
Country: United Kingdom
Location: Shropshire
Status: Offline
Posts: 10082
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 12:14
Originally posted by Ivan Lee Ivan Lee wrote:

This still doesn't make sense to me, why Sony doesn't make a pro-level body based on the Maxxum 9?

I have never had one, but some people say that the Maxxum 9 is even better and more pro-level than a EOS-1



Back up - how about one based on the 7 ? The A700 is too far away from it IMO, the ergonomics are much better on the 35mm. My main gripe is selecting specific AF points instantly and adjusting flash options quickly. You can do one by the shortcut button on the A700, but not both. You can do both instantly on the Dynax 7 :(.
I photograph the moments in people's lives that mean the most to them: Richard Harris Photography
Back to Top
Explorer45 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 02 March 2009
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 12:20
Originally posted by I Inspiron I Inspiron wrote:

That's true, but you would gain the true f2.8 again. You would need a 50-150/1.9 lens to get the same focal lengths and minimum DoF on an APS-C camera as you have with a 70-200/2.8 on a FF-camera. With an FF-camera the Minolta 28-135/4-4.5 would have about the same minimum DoF as an APS-C camera with a Tamron 17-50/2.8

Of course this boils down to DoF vs. longer focal length and because of the fact I would keep my A700 a FF-camera would complement it perfectly

Also very true, however, I think the 2.8 on an APS-C sensor is enough for me atm. Allthough, I could certainly see how you would want an FF since you then got the best out of two worlds when keeping that A700 of yours.
Back to Top
OldScotch View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 26 July 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Posts: 669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 15:08
Originally posted by utcreeper utcreeper wrote:

Canikon can afford issues, because no one cares.

Sony lacks that kind of market position, so they really have to get it right when they ship it.


I think Canon would put themselves in a bad position with any further issues after the relatively minor black dots on the 5dII that followed the AF debacle on the markIII cameras.

I agree that Sony's position demands that they get it right the first time though.
Back to Top
douglasf13 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 25 September 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Posts: 1730
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 18:06
Ivan, I think it's safe to say the A900 is the new Maxxum 9.
----
douglasferling.com
NEX-5, Hasselblad V, Leicaflex SL, Hipstamatic (former A900, A700, A100 owner.)
Back to Top
matthiaspaul View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 08 September 2006
Country: Germany
Status: Offline
Posts: 940
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 18:07
I think it wasn't mentioned already, but there are a few new accessories to be found on the Sony UK site as well:

http://www.mi-fo.de/forum/index.php?showtopic=23674&view=findpost&p=243834 [de]

    Sony Alpha Eyepiece FDA-EP5AM for currently unknown DSLR model
    Sony Alpha Soft Display Protection Foil PCK-LS5AM for currently unknown DSLR model
    Sony Alpha Soft Display Protection Foil PCK-LS6AM for currently unknown DSLR model

What can we draw from this?

Two display protectors probably means two new camera models. Since no new hard display protector aka "PCK-LH5AM" has shown up, this could indicate that a snap-on hard display protector cannot be installed on these models. This may mean two things: An articulated screen (liveview and/or video?) and/or a touch screen. Further, two new camera models and only one new eyepiece could mean, they both use the same eyepiece, however, it may also hint at one of them not in need of an eyepiece cover (no viewfinder?)

Greetings,

Matthias

Edited by matthiaspaul - 03 May 2009 at 18:14
--

Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de
 



Back to Top
tobywuk View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie

Joined: 30 June 2008
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Posts: 59
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 19:47

Click for full size - Uploaded with plasq's Skitch
Back to Top
albnok View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 01 October 2007
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Posts: 1018
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 21:11
Click "browse by category" then "Camcorders, Digital cameras And photo printers" and "Lenses & Filters".

The following cause the "Unfortunately your query did not result in a corresponding content match." error:

ALPHA LENS 18-200
ALPHA LENS 18-200MM
ALPHA LENS 18-70MM
ALPHA LENS 55-200MM
ALPHA LENS 75-300MM
SAL1855
SAL5018

So does that mean that there will be a motorized 18-200mm, 55-200mm and 75-300mm?
Back to Top
Explorer45 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 02 March 2009
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 21:20
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but what do you mean by motorized? I mean both the AF and stabilizer motor are in the body.

Edited by Explorer45 - 03 May 2009 at 21:21
Back to Top
dschroed View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 13 August 2007
Country: Germany
Location: Oberursel
Status: Offline
Posts: 637
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 21:25
Originally posted by Explorer45 Explorer45 wrote:

Sorry if this is a stupid question, but what do you mean by motorized? I mean both the AF and stabilizer motor are in the body.



I'm not sure about it. There are rumours, that the new lenses will have motor inside itself like some nikon lenses. Which meens they are/could be incompatible to the old minolta-mount.
The new lenses have an AF/MF switch and a design, which seems to include a motor. The link to the minolta-forum matthiaspaul is referring to is about that.
I personally doubt that one...

I think its because of the video-function and works somehow like the old xi-lenses (compatible). they where somehow "motorized", too.

Let's wait and see..

Edited by dschroed - 03 May 2009 at 21:37
Back to Top
albnok View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 01 October 2007
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Posts: 1018
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 22:08
Motorized as in, like SSM or the xi lenses. Which reminds me, the mock lenses at PMA09 didn't have xi-style zoom rockers (turn in a particular direction to automatically zoom in or out.)
Back to Top
dschroed View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 13 August 2007
Country: Germany
Location: Oberursel
Status: Offline
Posts: 637
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 22:14
I think it is the same like Panasonic's lenses for the new GH1 with video-function. They are compatible with the "old G1", but feature a special-silent motor which you are supposed not to hear at video-function.
I believe the motorized lenses by sony (if there are motorized lenses...) are compatible to the minolta-mount. Just like the xi-lenses were.

Edited by dschroed - 04 May 2009 at 01:11
Back to Top
Explorer45 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 02 March 2009
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Posts: 295
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 May 2009 at 22:47
Originally posted by dschroed dschroed wrote:

I'm not sure about it. There are rumours, that the new lenses will have motor inside itself like some nikon lenses. Which meens they are/could be incompatible to the old minolta-mount.
The new lenses have an AF/MF switch and a design, which seems to include a motor. The link to the minolta-forum matthiaspaul is referring to is about that.
I personally doubt that one...

I think its because of the video-function and works somehow like the old xi-lenses (compatible). they where somehow "motorized", too.

Let's wait and see..

But what's the point of having a motor in the lens if you have it in-body? Can they work together and make fokusing and whatnot faster?
Back to Top
PMac View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: 12 April 2007
Country: Australia
Location: Melbourne
Status: Offline
Posts: 2144
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 May 2009 at 00:02
Having "motorized" lenses that support a powered zoom function (yes like the old Minolta xi lenses) would be a huge step forward. Having tried to manually zoom while using the video function on a mates new canon I simply dont think video is that viable without it.
We are all going to die but at least we can go down swinging
Back to Top
Dyxum main page >  Forum Home > Equipment forums > Camera Talk > A-mount APS-C Page  <12345 39>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.

Monitor calibration strip

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer

In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania

Feel free to contact us if needed.