|
Page <12345 39> |
Author | |
I Inspiron ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 03 January 2008 Location: Austria Status: Offline Posts: 2871 |
![]() |
That's true, but you would gain the true f2.8 again. You would need a 50-150/1.9 lens to get the same focal lengths and minimum DoF on an APS-C camera as you have with a 70-200/2.8 on a FF-camera. With an FF-camera the Minolta 28-135/4-4.5 would have about the same minimum DoF as an APS-C camera with a Tamron 17-50/2.8 Of course this boils down to DoF vs. longer focal length and because of the fact I would keep my A700 a FF-camera would complement it perfectly |
|
Chris
|
|
![]() |
|
ricardovaste ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 08 August 2007 Country: United Kingdom Location: Shropshire Status: Offline Posts: 10082 |
![]() |
Back up - how about one based on the 7 ![]() |
|
I photograph the moments in people's lives that mean the most to them: Richard Harris Photography
|
|
![]() |
|
Explorer45 ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 02 March 2009 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Posts: 295 |
![]() |
Also very true, however, I think the 2.8 on an APS-C sensor is enough for me atm. Allthough, I could certainly see how you would want an FF since you then got the best out of two worlds when keeping that A700 of yours. |
|
![]() |
|
OldScotch ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 26 July 2007 Location: Canada Status: Offline Posts: 669 |
![]() |
I think Canon would put themselves in a bad position with any further issues after the relatively minor black dots on the 5dII that followed the AF debacle on the markIII cameras. I agree that Sony's position demands that they get it right the first time though. |
|
![]() |
|
douglasf13 ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 25 September 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Posts: 1730 |
![]() |
Ivan, I think it's safe to say the A900 is the new Maxxum 9.
|
|
----
douglasferling.com NEX-5, Hasselblad V, Leicaflex SL, Hipstamatic (former A900, A700, A100 owner.) |
|
![]() |
|
matthiaspaul ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 08 September 2006 Country: Germany Status: Offline Posts: 940 |
![]() |
I think it wasn't mentioned already, but there are a few new accessories to be found on the Sony UK site as well:
http://www.mi-fo.de/forum/index.php?showtopic=23674&view=findpost&p=243834 [de] ![]() ![]() ![]() What can we draw from this? Two display protectors probably means two new camera models. Since no new hard display protector aka "PCK-LH5AM" has shown up, this could indicate that a snap-on hard display protector cannot be installed on these models. This may mean two things: An articulated screen (liveview and/or video?) and/or a touch screen. Further, two new camera models and only one new eyepiece could mean, they both use the same eyepiece, however, it may also hint at one of them not in need of an eyepiece cover (no viewfinder?) Greetings, Matthias Edited by matthiaspaul - 03 May 2009 at 18:14 |
|
--
Minolta-Forum (MiFo) - German forum for the Minolta, Konica, Konica Minolta and Sony world of photography: http://www.mi-fo.de |
|
![]() |
|
tobywuk ![]() Groupie ![]() Joined: 30 June 2008 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Posts: 59 |
![]() |
![]() |
|
albnok ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 01 October 2007 Location: Malaysia Status: Offline Posts: 1018 |
![]() |
Click "browse by category" then "Camcorders, Digital cameras And photo printers" and "Lenses & Filters".
The following cause the "Unfortunately your query did not result in a corresponding content match." error: ALPHA LENS 18-200 ALPHA LENS 18-200MM ALPHA LENS 18-70MM ALPHA LENS 55-200MM ALPHA LENS 75-300MM SAL1855 SAL5018 So does that mean that there will be a motorized 18-200mm, 55-200mm and 75-300mm? |
|
![]() |
|
Explorer45 ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 02 March 2009 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Posts: 295 |
![]() |
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but what do you mean by motorized? I mean both the AF and stabilizer motor are in the body.
Edited by Explorer45 - 03 May 2009 at 21:21 |
|
![]() |
|
dschroed ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 13 August 2007 Country: Germany Location: Oberursel Status: Offline Posts: 637 |
![]() |
I'm not sure about it. There are rumours, that the new lenses will have motor inside itself like some nikon lenses. Which meens they are/could be incompatible to the old minolta-mount. The new lenses have an AF/MF switch and a design, which seems to include a motor. The link to the minolta-forum matthiaspaul is referring to is about that. I personally doubt that one... I think its because of the video-function and works somehow like the old xi-lenses (compatible). they where somehow "motorized", too. Let's wait and see.. Edited by dschroed - 03 May 2009 at 21:37 |
|
![]() |
|
albnok ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 01 October 2007 Location: Malaysia Status: Offline Posts: 1018 |
![]() |
Motorized as in, like SSM or the xi lenses. Which reminds me, the mock lenses at PMA09 didn't have xi-style zoom rockers (turn in a particular direction to automatically zoom in or out.)
|
|
![]() |
|
dschroed ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 13 August 2007 Country: Germany Location: Oberursel Status: Offline Posts: 637 |
![]() |
I think it is the same like Panasonic's lenses for the new GH1 with video-function. They are compatible with the "old G1", but feature a special-silent motor which you are supposed not to hear at video-function.
I believe the motorized lenses by sony (if there are motorized lenses...) are compatible to the minolta-mount. Just like the xi-lenses were. Edited by dschroed - 04 May 2009 at 01:11 |
|
![]() |
|
Explorer45 ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 02 March 2009 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Posts: 295 |
![]() |
But what's the point of having a motor in the lens if you have it in-body? Can they work together and make fokusing and whatnot faster? |
|
![]() |
|
PMac ![]() Senior Member ![]() Joined: 12 April 2007 Country: Australia Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Posts: 2144 |
![]() |
Having "motorized" lenses that support a powered zoom function (yes like the old Minolta xi lenses) would be a huge step forward. Having tried to manually zoom while using the video function on a mates new canon I simply dont think video is that viable without it.
|
|
We are all going to die but at least we can go down swinging
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Page <12345 39> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.

Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania
Feel free to contact us if needed.