Minolta AF 300mm F4 HS APO G A-mount lens review by QuietOC
|QuietOC#45695 date: May-1-2021|
flare control: 3
|ownership:||I have experience with this lens|
|compared to:||Tamron 28-300 XR Di|
Tamron 28-300 XR
Tokina AF 35-300
Sony DT 55-300 SAM
Canon EF 70-300 IS II USM
Sony 70-300 G SSM II
Tamron SP 70-300 USD
Sony A 70-400 G SSM
Minolta AF 75-300 "Big Beercan"
Minolta AF 75-300 D
Minolta AF 100-300 APO
Minolta AF 100-300 APO D
Minolta AF 100-400 APO
Sigma APO 300 F4 Tele Macro
Sigma APO 400 F5.6 Tele Macro HSM
Sigma APO 400 F5.6
|price paid:||400 USD (used)|
Maintains focal length
Warm color cast
2.5 meter closest focus
Mild pincushion distortion
Non-removable tripod foot
Lack of Lens Compensation
|comment:||This was a best offer accepted by an individual eBay seller. It included a slightly dented original hood, original caps, and slide-in normal filter. It has a clean body with only a few small spots of chipped paint. Several large flecks are visible in the front group of elements. "JAPAN"|
The gold letters and decorative ring and APO moniker seem to be an empty marketing ploys. Were their older manual focus 300 mm non-APO primes worse? The Tamron 70-300 RXD has better correction.
The sliding range limiter is an interesting design. It also allows an infinity calibration, though you lose it if you use the limiter for any other purpose. There a mark to indicate where infinity should be.
The focus throw is very short making manual focus difficult. The focus ring cover might be protecting fragile gearing. The gearing makes horrible noise like the worst Sigma lenses. For all of that and the High Oeed designation it does not autofocus quickly. The top mounted filter tray leaves large gaps for almost anything to enter the middle of the lens.
A better aligned example should probably earn a 4 for sharpness. this one is a doorstop. It could certainly be used stopped down, but there are smaller and lighter zooms with better image quality.