Sony FE 24-105mm F4 G OSS E-mount lens review by QuietOC

reviewer#45615 date: Nov-30-2020
sharpness: 4
color: 5
build: 4
distortion: 3
flare control: 4
overall: 4
tested on:
  • film camera:Film camera
  • APS-C: 6MP6 MP; 10MP10 MP; 12MP12 MP; 14MP14 MP; 16MP16 MP; 20MP20 MP; 24MP24 MP
  • full frame: 12MP12 MP; 24MP24 MP; 36MP36 MP; 42MP42 MP; 61MP61 MP
ownership:I own this lens
compared to:Canon EF 22-55 F4-5.6 USM
Sigma 24-70 F2.8 DG DN Art
Canon EF 24-85 F3.5-4.5 USM
Minolta AF 24-85 F3.5-4.5 & RS
Minolta AF 24-105 F3.5-4.5 D
Tamron SP 24-135 F3.5-5.6
Minolta AF 24-50 F4
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III RXD
Sony 28-75 F2.8 SAM
Tamron SP 28-75mm F2.8 XR Di
Tokina 28-80 F2.8 AT-X Pro
Sigma AF 28-105 F2.8-4
Sony FE 28-70 F3.5-5.6 OSS
Minolta AF 28-80 F3.5-5.6 D
Minolta AF 28-85 F3.5-4.5
Minolta AF 28-100 F3.5-5.6 D
Canon EF 28-105 F3.5-4.5 USM II
Minolta AF 28-105 F3.5-4.5 & RS & Xi
Tamron 28-300 F3.5-6.3 XR & Di
Tamron 28-200 F3.8-5.6 LD
Minolta AF 28-135 F4-4.5
Minolta AF 35-105 F3.5-4.5/New
Sigma AF 35-135 F3.5-4.5
Minolta AF 35-70 F4
Minolta AF 35-80 F4-5.6 II
Tokina AF 35-200 F4-5.6 SD
Minolta AF 35-200 F4.5-5.6 Xi
price paid:1100 USD (new)
positive:No metal surfaces
Good alignment
Parfocal
No focus breathing
Very quiet focusing
Lens Compensation
negative:Price
Size & weight
Heavy extending zoom
Distortion
Lateral CA
Midfield issues
comment:I wanted a good normal zoom wider than 28 mm. This seems to be the most often recommended one. It is currently the best standard zoom recommendation at DPReview and also their alternative travel zoom recommendation. Sony announced this lens in 2017 for $1300. It has been on sale for $1100 for about a month now. My Greentoe offer for $1000 was not accepted. They sent me an email warning that "items are selling out quicker than usual." A local camera shop had no copies in stock. The sales person recommended adapting the Sigma 24-105 F4 Art lens instead.

This was the most up-to-date FE normal zoom until the compact 28-60 was released. Unlike that lens it does not support the Aperture Drive feature of the A9 models, but it does support 20 FPS burst tracking which all third-party lenses and the older Sony 28-70 OSS and 24-70 ZA OSS do not support.

This copy has no obvious tilt or centering issues. It looks and feels cheaper than Sony's A-mount zooms or Minolta's mid-range zooms. The rear plastic barrel flexes under moderate pressure like the FE 50 F1.8 and Tamron OSD primes. I appreciate the rubber control grips and absence of alloy veneer. "Made in Thailand"

The optics perform closer to the old film zooms than I expected. It is better aligned than any of them throughout the zoom range. It is not as sharp as the Sony 28-75mm F2.8 SAM. The wide end is not as wide as the old 24-x zooms, but it is wider than the FE 2/28. The long end of the zoom is significantly longer at close focus than the old internal focus x-105mm zooms but wider than the original 35-105.

Image corners are often clearer than the old film zooms--probably since like the 28-75 it is designed for the Sony optical stack instead of film. It has typical achromatic aberrations. It performs somewhat worse than the 28-70 OSS in the middle of their shared range. It doesn't compete with any of the cheap primes in its range.

Like the 2/28 and 28-70 OSS Sony doesn't allow the Distortion Compensation to be disabled when this lens is mounted. My rating reflects the raw optical distortion not the digital corrections.

Overall a bulky, compromised, but decent standard zoom quite good for recording video. The extended range and constant aperture are the advantages over the 28-70 OSS for the tradeoffs of cost and handling. The rendering is nicer than the Sony 28-75 F2.8 SAM though it is not as sharp.

rating summary

lens image
  • total reviews: 10
  • sharpness: 4.70
  • color: 4.90
  • build: 4.80
  • distortion: 4.10
  • flare control: 4.50
  • overall: 4.60
Dyxum.com - Home of the alpha system photographer
In memory of Cameron Hill - brettania