Minolta AF 135mm F2.8 A-mount lens reviews
 boyzone#9747 date: Jan-3-2012 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 4.5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.7 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | - Tamron 70-200 F2.8 - SAL70400G - M100 F2.8 macro |
| price paid: | 400 USD (used) |
| positive: | - Light weight |
| negative: | - Flare control is weak - Soft at 2.8 |
| comment: | F2.8 is soft while need to step down until F4 to get razor sharp. However, soft image is good for portrait. Flare control is very weak, need to additional add in costume hood to improve. |
; 16MP| derekw#9605 date: Nov-17-2011 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 5 overall: 5 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | Minolta 70-210 F4 Minolta 50 F3.5 macro |
| price paid: | 200 GBP |
| positive: | Very sharp Minolta colours Build Integral hood Small and light |
| negative: | Cost - but you get a lot of IQ for the money |
| comment: | Not as sharp as the 50 macro (no surprise) but still very sharp with marvellous colours and contrast producing 3D like images. The hood does its job and is nicely tucked away when refixing the front lens cap. Costly - but good glass usually is!!! |
| Hipporippo#9589 date: Nov-15-2011 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 5 overall: 5 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | 50mm 1.4 Beercan Minolta 35-105 |
| price paid: | Bundled |
| positive: | Sharpest lens in my bag by far. Kills the 50mm 1.4 in this regard. Longish telephoto given the small size and large aperture for a full frame lens. Paired with an achromat diopter (ie canon, marumi, or raynox), gives macro with sharpness similar to that of a dedicated macro lens while allowing more room from the subject than the 50mm 2.8 macro. Colors and microcontrast require less pp than many other lenses. |
| negative: | A little too long for portraiture in aps-c. A little too sharp for female portraits. Old screw-drive AF. |
| comment: | I bought this lens, the 28mm 2.8, and 50mm 1.4 from someone on Craigslist for $250. I think I got a damn good deal based on this lens alone (even though I have not been blown away by the 50mm 1.4) |
| gnhock#9066 date: May-30-2011 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 4.5 color: 5 build: 4 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.5 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | 24mm f2.8 50mm f1.8 18-250mm zoom |
| price paid: | missing |
| positive: | Great Prime! Quick to focus Small size & light weight Well made |
| negative: | Slight CA wide open; but can correct PP |
| comment: | Bought this to match A55 for a lightweight setup. Highly recommended for those who (a) Must have lightest setup (b) Can live with primes and without zooms |
| tomiZG#8878 date: Apr-6-2011 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.8 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | - T 90 2,8 - M 50 1,7 - beercan |
| price paid: | 180 EUR |
| positive: | - sharp - small and light |
| negative: | - mfd? |
| comment: | Bought it from someone who sold his a900 and said it was too long for the aps-c cameras. Got a copy in mint condition, the lens is amazing! Size is almost like the 50mm 1,7 just a bit longer. Build is flawless. Sharpness is on par with my Tammy 90 and that would be the sharpest lens I have. On full frame this is a must-have. As I don't own a 70-200 2.8 zoom I will use this beauty excessively in the next period. Don't know if it gets redundant once you have a 2.8 long zoom, but I guess I'll keep it even then. Minimum focus distance is sth. like 1 m which is a bit long in some cases. EDIT: This lens produces contrast and colors like no other lens I had before. It took some time to use it to figure out how much I can get out of the RAW files shot on the a900 with LR, the results are stunning and look like commercial shots. Makes me want to get the 70-200 2.8 from Sony as I guess this is what you get. |
| Tricky01#8847 date: Mar-29-2011 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 4 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.6 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I used to own this lens |
| compared to: | Sigma 70-200 Tamron 70-200 Sony 70-200 Sony 70-300 Minolta 70-210 (not beercan) |
| price paid: | 210 GBP used |
| positive: | Sharp as a tack tiny solidly built Very fast focus Very accurate focus TINY!! |
| negative: | small focus ring suppose you could easily lose it |
| comment: | I love this lens. I nearly sold it a few weeks ago but so pleased I didn't. It's a lens I rarely use, but am so pleased I still have it in my bag. It takes great photos and is only made redundant by the 70-200. It is sharp wide open although it does suffer a little from CA. For the price you really can't go wrong. It's a tiny tiny lens and built like a tank. The only weakness would be the pull out hood, but despite it's delicate feel it hasn't broken and it's how old? So if you get a chance buy this; it's a great lens for the camera and a great lens for the collection. Well worth the money and cracking lens for the one prime challenges. UPDATE: Replaced with 135 1.8CZ and that is a stellar lens. Much larger and heavier, and of course expensive. If you can't afford the CZ though, this is the lens to go for, 135 is a wonderful focal length - approx 200mm on APSC or good long portrait lens on FF |
| svendf#8634 date: Feb-7-2011 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 4.5 color: 4 build: 5 distortion: 4 flare control: 4 overall: 4.3 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I used to own this lens |
| compared to: | missing |
| price paid: | 225 Euro(used mint) |
| positive: | Light Small Fast AF Sharp |
| negative: | Imbedded lens hood to small for my taste MFD a little too long |
| comment: | As everyone was saying such positive things about this lens I decided to try one. Everything which was written is true but as I'm not a people photographer I didn't fall in love with lens and sold it to someone who could make better use of it. |
| RedDrake#8460 date: Dec-28-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 3 overall: 4.6 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | Sigma 70-200 EX II HSM |
| price paid: | 220 EUR |
| positive: | + sharp + relatively small + light + fast AF |
| negative: | - flare & ghosting |
| comment: | This is another gem from Minolta. My copy does seem to suffer a bit from front-focus issues or something similar and it's not sharp anywhere at hard stop infinity (it's sharp if I MF it almost to infinity), but since I mostly use it indoors for candid portraits and stage shooting with available light it doesn't bother me too much. The coatings it has are obviously a joke (but I guess it was normal for the 80's when this was being made), since I've gotten ghosts in images simply from brass objects being lit directly by the sun. Flare is a problem too. I've recently tried to take some photos of a rather impressing sunset, and even though the colors are perfect, I have "multiple" suns and flares all over the scene. This focal length, speed and size/weight can't be beat I guess. If you find one, get it! |
| ciupo35#8421 date: Dec-19-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 4.5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 5 overall: 4.9 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | MAF 70-210/3.5-4.5 Samyang 85/1.4 |
| price paid: | 330 USD (used) |
| positive: | F/2.8 very useful pleasant color acceptable sharpness not heavy very fast AF |
| negative: | CA sometimes appear (wide open), rare, hard to find in good condition |
| comment: | Good portait lens on a900/850. It is also useful in other shallow DOF applications. Auto focus is really fast. |
| neo_roxx#8373 date: Dec-8-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 4 distortion: 5 flare control: 5 overall: 4.8 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | SAL 50 F1.4 |
| price paid: | 300 USD (Used) |
| positive: | Sharp even at F2.8 Light Weight Fast AF Great & Smooth Bokeh |
| negative: | Color Fringe visible at F2.8 |
| comment: | missing |
| fute77#8265 date: Nov-17-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 4.5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.7 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I have experience with this lens |
| compared to: | minolta 100/2 |
| price paid: | missing |
| positive: | small light enougth |
| negative: | nothing |
| comment: | very good for portrait on FF (A900) very interesting on A700 but maybe a little to long for APS-C a good old minolta lens |
| woodmen#7965 date: Sep-13-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 3 distortion: 5 flare control: 5 overall: 4.6 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | Minolta 85mm f/1.4 Sony 50mm f/1.4 Minolta 28-135mm f/4-4.5 |
| price paid: | 275 CAN (used) |
| positive: | Sharpness wide open Saturated colors very light fast autofocus very good contrast |
| negative: | build quality could be better Don't like the build-in lens hood very small purple fringing wide open |
| comment: | It's been one week since I bought this lens and I am slowly learning to love it. Sharpness wide open is very good. Autofocus is fast and accurate. The colors are rich and saturated and it's a joy to use because it's so light. I would highly recommend this lens to anyone interested in this focal lenght but dosen't have the money for the zeiss. The is some purple fringing wide open but it desappear when you stop down to 3.5. But, you don't have to be afraid of the fringing; it's only noticable if you pixel peep. |
| dumbasadoorknob#7937 date: Sep-4-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.8 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | Zony 135/1.8 Min 28-135/4+ |
| price paid: | usd 200 used |
| positive: | Small size Minolta colors simplicity |
| negative: | A little old now |
| comment: | A few months ago I tested these three lenses together, with and without a cirpol and then a Moose's warm filter, and then pixel-peeped, for the purpose of persuading myself to sell the two old Mins. I failed. They are different from the Zeiss. The small, handy, simple, 55mm filter 135 is marginally more acute than the 28-135, and clearly less so than the edgy Zeiss. But the overall quality of the image is so high that one doesn't begrudge the occasional edge softness. And the colors! Yesterday I read an old article by David Kilpatrick that stated older Minolta lenses were "color-matched" in their lacquers so that they'd all react to a CC filter in the identical way. And it shows in what I think of as consistent Minolta color -- darker than Zeiss, more saturated perhaps than reality, but giving the image on later review an element of memory..."ah,yes, that's just how it was..." The Min 135 is a lens to keep in your pocket always and, in my world, the perfect companion to my 35/2RS. Between them, they can do everything exceedingly well even though, on MTF and Imatests, they are far from perfect. They are light, small, useful, useable, simple and enjoyable lenses that make one focus on the subject, not the machinery. |
| kozmo#7636 date: Jun-28-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.8 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | TAMRON 70-200 BEERCAN BBC KM 28-75 |
| price paid: | $300 |
| positive: | SHARP SMALL SIZE FAST AF BOKEH |
| negative: | HARD TO FIND ONE REALLY |
| comment: | LENS DOES WHAT YOU EXPECT. FAST AF, NICE BOKEH, SHARP, AND IN A VERY SMALL PACKAGE. FOUND ON CRAIGSLIST AND HESITATED TO BUY IT. POUND FOR POUND MAYBE AS GOOD A LENS AS YOU CAN GET. GREAT CANDID PORTRAIT LENS. DOES NOT DRAW ATTENTION BUT ON APC IT IS A 200 2.8. (POCKET ROCKET FOR SURE) |
| paso144#7481 date: May-25-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.8 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | 50 F/1.4 28-135 Tokina (Bokina) 90mm F/2.5 Macro (MF) |
| price paid: | 30 euro (no typo) |
| positive: | Sharp wide open. Extremely sharp above F/3.5. Compact size. Build quality. |
| negative: | None. |
| comment: | Wow, this is one incredible lens, especially for portraits. It has a very good build and is perfectly compact on my 7D. IQ is amazing. Pictures have a fantastic 3D feel to them and the bokeh is very smooth and creamy (by far the best of my AF lensen, only beaten by the Tokina macro which is exceptional). Sharpness full open is already very good and gets extremely good stopped down a tad. Also sharp in the edges and lots of micro detail available. Bought this one in a set together with a 35-105 N and Sigma 50mm macro for 50 euro of a guy who didn't know it fits a digital body (my copy has some very small dots of fungus which is barely visible and certainly not on photos). Sold the 35-105 for 50 euro and gave the macro to my dad to play with. So basically got this beauty for free. |
| Raimios#7460 date: May-21-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.8 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | Sigma 105/2.8, Minolta 28-135 |
| price paid: | missing |
| positive: | Sharp, Colors |
| negative: | Nothing |
| comment: | missing |
| gillbod#7399 date: May-4-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 4.5 color: 5 build: 4 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.5 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | km 85/1.4 sony 70-300g |
| price paid: | 230 EUR |
| positive: | size focusing speed focusing accuracy bokeh sharpness stopped down |
| negative: | purple fringing wide open |
| comment: | a lens that i intend to sell, but just can't bring myself to do it. it doesn't draw much attention, has a fluffy bokeh, focuses very quickly. it's great for candids, or portraits from across the room for those that get shy if a dslr is shoved into their face. there's a small amount of purple fringing wide open. sharpness is ok at 2.8, and very sharp from 4. i don't hesitate using it at 2.8. i intend to sell it, because i don't use it that much. but when it's on the camera, it never disappoints, and is a joy to use. |
| N_Raged#7350 date: Apr-25-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 4.5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.7 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I used to own this lens |
| compared to: | Minolta 70-210mm f/4 |
| price paid: | missing |
| positive: | +Smooth and faithful colour rendering +Soft and buttery bokeh +Fast AF speed +Convenient hood that works +Compact and light (the pocket rocket) |
| negative: | -Noticeable purple fringing @2.8 -Some longitudinal CA (green bokeh CA) -Rare! |
| comment: | This lens was obviously made to shoot portraits and boy does it do it well. The way it renders images is simply phenomenal with its colours, bokeh, and just the right amount of sharpness. Contrast is a bit low at f/2.8 but firms up by f/4 where image quality pretty much maxes out and all fringing issues are gone. Though the sweet spot is f/3.5 where the balance between bokeh and resolution is ideal. Great value too! |
| 5thElefant#7315 date: Apr-19-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 4.5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.7 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | Sony 50mm f1.4 Minolta 28-135mm Takumar 135mm f2.5 |
| price paid: | Ł190 |
| positive: | Compact Pull out hood |
| negative: | missing |
| comment: | Sharp-ish wide open but gets sharper quickly. Pocket sized which is useful. Very useful at social events for candids. |
| GEPhoto#7277 date: Apr-12-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 4 distortion: 5 flare control: 5 overall: 4.8 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | missing |
| price paid: | 320USD |
| positive: | Very sharp Fast AF for the type of Lens Minimum Focus lower than counterpart |
| negative: | Could do very well without the built in hood makes the metal lens feel flimsy plus i dislike pulling it out of my shootsac. |
| comment: | I have not yet tested this lens in low light to talk about its sharpness at larger apertures though at 3.5 i see very nice bokeh and very good IQ. The only complaint i have is the built in hood. In all honesty it is a 20 year old lens and it has not shown any signs of damage yet so its more aesthetic my personal dislike of this feature. |
| pcarmalt#7219 date: Apr-1-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 4 color: 5 build: 4 distortion: 5 flare control: 5 overall: 4.6 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | Minolta 28-135 F4-4.5 Minolta 35-105 F3.5-4.5 Old) Minolta 70-210 F4 CZ 85 F1.4 Sony 100 F2.8 Macro |
| price paid: | GBP 230 I think |
| positive: | + Fastest AF of all my lenses + Very compact and lightweight + Love the sliding hood + Lovely colour, esp. skintones, makes ideal for portraits. + Best bokeh of all my lenses except CZ85 + Sharpness good wide open, certainly for portrait can use wide open without hesitation |
| negative: | - Doesn't seem to improve in sharpness when stopped down like other lenses. Beercan may be as sharp or sharper by F8. - Not circular aperture - Some CA/purple fringing - I don't use it as often as I should |
| comment: | I love this lens for portraits, candids at parties etc. The AF speed really is great, so much faster than CZ85 means it's a better choice if your subject is moving. Wide open, as sharp as 100 Macro! Out of 158 photos with this lens in my Lightroom catalogue, 118 were taken at f/2.8, this is where the lens excels. If you stop down to F/5.6 or F/8 then there is no real advantage over 28-135 zoom... Hard to take a bad picture with this lens. I will make a vow to use it more often :-) |
| fijnefotografie#7215 date: Apr-1-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 4.5 color: 5 build: 4 distortion: 5 flare control: 5 overall: 4.7 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | 70-210 f4 beercan |
| price paid: | 250 Euro |
| positive: | light small built-in hood |
| negative: | not the chick-magnet some would want it to be |
| comment: | I was able to buy a mint copy of this great little lens. It showed up for sale at the time I was thinking to buy one. 250 Euro seems a lot but I didn't want to save money and wait to buy a CZ. |
| Ovas#7180 date: Mar-28-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 4 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.6 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | CZ 135mm f1.8 NIKON 135 f2.8. |
| price paid: | US$ 100 |
| positive: | Light to carry, Is very light and handsome as a 200 f2.8 on my APS-C 7D. |
| negative: | nothing yet |
| comment: | Have had this one for years. On my 7D it is very good, gives me nice picktures. Had the opportunity to take some test picktures with both CZ 135 and this on my A900; The CZ is clearly sharper, but this little gem has still good contrast and at 13mpx on my A900 it works well stepped down to F5.6. Wide open it is not so sharp specially in cornes, and it gives vignetting. Compared to the NIKON 135 f2.8 non AI + D700, it is not as sharp at 2.8, but stepped down they are more equal. Not preferred on A900 at highest resolution. |
| Maddogg#7178 date: Mar-28-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 5 overall: 5 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | 50mm F1.4 100mm F2.8 |
| price paid: | 399 € |
| positive: | + Sharp as hell + Light and small + Built like a tank + Awesome bokeh + Amazing colors |
| negative: | Extremely rare |
| comment: | If you say the lens is soft, then there is something wrong with your version or you don't know how to focus. Last summer I took some handheld pictures from the side of the road (taking a picture of some wild flowers) for testing the lens in a different environment. When I got home and loaded the pictures to my PC & zoomed in I couldn't believe my eyes. So many details, sharpness and what color. That was almost better than my Minolta 100mm F2.8 macro lens. This lens and the 50mm F1.4 are still the only ones in my camera bag. They follow me where ever I go. I'm still in love with this lens. These "Pocket Rockets" (as they are called) are extremely rare now a days and the price goes up for every second. If you can effort it, then don't hesitate for a second. |
| terenz#7177 date: Mar-28-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 4.5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 4 flare control: 3 overall: 4.3 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | Minolta 70-210mm F4 Minolta 75-300mm F45.-5.6 Sony 75-300mm |
| price paid: | 220 CAD |
| positive: | Light, fast |
| negative: | CA shows up on mine at times |
| comment: | Light, fast lense good for candid shots. Almost too fast - getting speeds up to 4000 at ISO 100 on bright days if wide open. Only problem I've noticed so far is CA. Not the sharpest on an A850 when shot as 24Mp and viewing at full pixel. |
| teejay#7040 date: Mar-9-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 4.5 color: 5 build: 4 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.5 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | beercan minolta 80-200/2,8 APO sony 18-250 |
| price paid: | 230 euros used |
| positive: | fast focus small and light very sharp at f4 colors and contrast |
| negative: | purple fringing at 2.8 diaphragm not circular |
| comment: | Great portrait lens! Very fast and accurate focus, good colors, bokeh is good (beercan like) but not as good as minolta 80-200/2,8, all in a very lightweight package. Sharpness is acceptable at 2,8, where the bokeh is the most pleasant (round highlights, if you stop just 1/3 of a stop, 7 sided polygons appear), and improves upon stopping down. As this is not an APO design, purple fringing is rather pronounced at large apertures, but is mostly gone by f5,6. All in all, a very nice outdoors portrait lens, also great for street photography. The picture it produces are very similar to those of the beercan, but with more pop, better sharpness and marginally better bokeh. It is however in every way optically surpassed by 80-200/2,8, (except min focus distance), but they are not in the same league, nor do they cost the same price... |
| MacMichael#6994 date: Mar-4-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 5 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.8 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | Minolta af 50 f1,7 RS Minolta af 35-105 N Minolta af 70-210 (beercan) Sony SAL 1870 Sony SAL 75300 |
| price paid: | 250 € |
| positive: | + sharp as hell + light and small + nice bokeh + great colours o af is ok |
| negative: | none so far |
| comment: | This is an awsone portrait lens. I used it in low light, outside and inside with and without flash and it's sharp in every situation. Can't tell the sharpness stopped down to more than 10, but who does shooting portraits. Grab one if you can, this is a cute little lens. |
| Apocalypse_later#6988 date: Mar-3-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 4.5 color: 4 build: 4 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.3 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | Beercan, Sony 50 1.4, Sony 70-300G, Tamron 17-50 2.8 |
| price paid: | 300€ mint |
| positive: | Very light, very small, very good build, very good optical quality. Built in lens hod. AF decently fast. |
| negative: | 2.8: Strong CA and flares that deteriorate very much the imagen shotting in jpg (without problems in raw and overexposing). Tiny focus ring, and moves during AF. |
| comment: | I like very much its size, weight, build and hood, and is very easy isolate the subjet of the background with this lens. What about sharpness? In jpg: Very good f4, and excellent f5.6, but its 2.8 is bad with CA problems. Overexposing and shooting in raw You´ll have very good quality at any aperture. It´s a common problem in old lenses... |
| dvha79_ddt#6790 date: Jan-21-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 4 distortion: 5 flare control: 4 overall: 4.6 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | missing |
| price paid: | 360 USD |
| positive: | Sharp at 3.5 perfect color Fast AF |
| negative: | missing |
| comment: | missing |
| Shootist#6752 date: Jan-15-2010 | |
|---|---|
sharpness: 5 color: 5 build: 4 distortion: 4 flare control: 4 overall: 4.4 | tested on:
|
| ownership: | I own this lens |
| compared to: | I think I've owned ALL (then perhaps sold some) of the Minolta Consumer lenses by now! PENTAX 135 2.8 Manual focus on the A350 w/adaptor |
| price paid: | 310 USD |
| positive: | Sharp as all hell at 2.8!!! Nice and light Hood *works*! |
| negative: | Not a sharp lens at F8+ like some others |
| comment: | So...this lens. Where do I start? I generally concur with the comments below. I think I'm a big under-educated on this one since it's specifically a "portrait lens" and I'm not traditinally a portrait photographer. But I think that means that it's supposed to be somewhat softer and nicer in bokeh and also able to shoot good stuff at 2.8 - it's lowest F-stop. Stop me if I'm going off track here... So going with those thoughts. It's GREAT at stealing shots across a pretty darkened (by photographic standards) room at ISO 100! Not familiar territory for me. Candid shots of my 7 month old and wife (breast feeding even) are easy and they never really know - as not to ruin the shot. That's all I'll say. I don't want to dis the lens and say that it disappointed my beyond the lower F-stops compared to my tack-sharp PENTAX 135 manual or other Minolta primes...this thing holds it's own at 2.8 and for that I'm grateful - especially at this price!!!! -Shootist |
rating summary
- total reviews: 139
- sharpness: 4.69
- color: 4.92
- build: 4.65
- distortion: 4.91
- flare control: 4.44
- overall: 4.72
to add your review
you need to login
you need to login